Two great Americans, General Grant and General Lee, fought for their respective, regional beliefs. Despite their regional differences, they were very much alike. It was April 9, 1865, when Ulysses S. Grant and Robert E. Lee met in the parlor in Appomattox Court House to determine the fate of the fugitive South (the former Confederacy). To the South, General Lee was the cornerstone of motivation. He represented the notion that the old, aristocratic concept should dominate American life, in order for the South to maintain its unique culture. Lee deeply grounded in the ideals of family, culture, and tradition, was a Virginian. He was proud that America had the right to pronounce inequality in the social structure and believed that land should be the principal source of wealth and influence. General Lee personified the traditional, Southern, aristocratic ideals. Through him, the Southern states fought a desperate war to uphold the ideals to which he was dedicated. Hence, if there were no justification for fighting the war, the Confederates were able to rationalize it because of Lee. The justification for combat was the Virginian who lived in a static society that endured everything, except change. Lee's rationalization for fighting this war was that he was defending everything that gave his life meaning.Grant was the exact opposite of Lee. Born the son of a tanner on the Western frontier, he revered no one; he cared very little for the past, yet had a keen vision for the future. Grant's ideals of America were summed up in paragraph eight of Grant and Lee: A Study in Contrasts, "No man was born to anything, except perhaps to a chance to show how far he could rise, life was competition." However, these feelings would not dissuade his patriotic outlook towards the national community. He upheld the idea that the only way to prosper was through the prosperity of the community. Thus, all of the communities that ran from the Atlantic to Pacific, which had accessible markets and towns, encouraged a man to thrive. Fate clenched Grant's views of the nation as a whole; he saw his own fate in terms of the entire nation's destiny. Grant's justification for combat was a broader concept of society: growth, expansion and a constantly widening horizon.
Although Grant, an industrial fanatic, and Lee, a man of aristocratic ideals, adopted different philosophies during the Civil War, they were very much alike in essence. These two soldiers were stunning fighters who similarly entered the war with firmness and loyalty. Grant fought towards the Mississippi Valley despite military handicaps, and Lee stayed in the trenches at Petersburg even after all hope had died. In addition, both generals had the optimistic attitude and were able to forgive and forget in order to turn a conflict into a binding truce. At Appomattox, the men reconciled, which was crucial in uniting the North and the South.
In my opinion, to fight against neighbor and brother is unacceptable. However, such an ironic situation as this one places great men before the eyes of critics and these critics must value and uphold their loyalty to their respective regional views. Catton uses diction and juxtaposition to reveal that despite their different characteristics, Grant and Lee were both great men, who stood fast for their beliefs. These, two, unforgettable men represented the weakness and the strengths of both sides of the Civil War, and displayed the most noble patriotism that can be expected during war-time- love for one's community. Two great Americans, Grant and Lee, may appear different, yet at the end of the day, they are very much alike.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
This is in fact an interesting piece of literature that was produced by the Bruce Catton, unlike his usual commentary on the American Civil War; his novel captures the sentiments of a young man coming of age and incorporates a strong nostalgic component that has become a major part of the American life (Ch. 11, p. 246). Having been a part of an era, where the aftermath of the war still reverberated throughout the nation and for the author, Catton, those were the stories that he had grown up listening to in rural Michigan.…
- 734 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Bruce Catton focuses on both the differences and similarities between Civil War Generals in "Grant and Lee: A Study in Contrasts". He looks at the fact that both Grant and Lee grew up in America. Lee was from Tidewater, Virginia in the South, and Grant from the Western frontier. He noted that both military leaders had different values.…
- 177 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
He became the symbol of the south, in which change was not an option for the south, and Lee will fight to the end to keep the way of living the same. Catton…
- 347 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
General Robert E. Lee was considered to be one of the finest military strategists in American history. However, he had several disadvantages at Gettysburg that greatly impacted the fate of the Confederate Army in the American Civil War, and eventually led to the surrender of the Confederacy. General Lee’s main disadvantages at Gettysburg included a deficiency of information from the calvary due to General J.E.B. Stuart’s absence and Pickett’s Charge being miscalculated and an act of desperation.…
- 306 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Man. The killer angel. [1] Since the dawn of civilization humanity has fought to protect what they hold dear. Whether that be freedom, religion or land, the body politic has been at war, even within their own borders. Civil War is defined as a war between regions of the same country.[2] Throughout the course of the four and a half year Civil War, many battles were fought, but none quite as pivotal as the Battle of Gettysburg. Had Lee obliged Longstreet in his persistence of a defensive strategy, the Confederate Army very well could have won the war. Instead, the Union succeeded in holding their ground atop a hillside and thus defeating the Confederate Army and ultimately winning the war. One contemplates the motivations of both the Confederates and the Union soldiers in the United States Civil War. Was it money? Power? Dominance? Michael Shaara, author of The Killer Angels suggests alternative motives. In his novel about the pivotal battle, he suggests that even though it was commonly perceived that soldiers were fighting solely…
- 1531 Words
- 7 Pages
Best Essays -
Historians have argued inconclusively for years over the prime reason for Confederate defeat in the Civil War. The book Why the North Won the Civil War outlines five of the most agreed upon causes of Southern defeat, each written by a highly esteemed American historian. The author of each essay does acknowledge and discuss the views of the other authors. However, each author also goes on to explain their botheration and disagreement with their opposition. The purpose of this essay is to summarize each of the five arguments presented by Richard N. Current, T. Harry Williams, Norman A. Graebner, David Herbert Donald, and David M. Potter. Each author gives his insight on one of the following five reasons: economic, military, diplomatic, social, and political, respectively.…
- 1300 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Grant goal during the war was to stay in the fields but be close enough to General Meade in case he may need help. Though as this is all taking place Lee knew it would take everything out of his men to be able to beat the North. As this was playing out in Cold Harbor Lee’s army was consistory being drilled my Northern troops, but he still managed to hang on during the war. The problem during the war with Lee was that time was against him he needed a lot to go right in order for him to win. The only thing that was happening good for Lee was there were more causalities for the North then there were with the South.…
- 1247 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Although Ulysses S. Grant and Robert E. Lee were born in the same time period Catton showed how they had very different views from one another. To start of with Catton explained how Lee was an "old age" and did not like change. He wanted the old aristocrat concept to stay in the American culture. He was also born into a wealthy family so he believed it was okay for the upper-class to be more privileged and thought inequality among men made society more advanced. In contrast, Grant was born poor and "came up the hard way" as Catton said, because of this Grant believed every man should be equal. He also believed in change and wanted the future of society to be different than how it was at that current time.…
- 263 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
When Catton says that Grant “was everything Lee was not” (310) he means that Grant and Lee were two very different people from the way they were raised to their views of American life. Grant was very tough and courageous, raised from in the western frontier. He was a man who held his head up high, looked towards the future, and was determined to follow through with his ideas of a “new” American life. In contrast, Lee was a Virginia man who believed in old aristocracy. “He was one of a body of men who owed reverence and obeisance to no one, who were self-reliant to a fault, who cared hardly anything for the past but who had a sharp eye for the future” (Catton 310). When Catton said this he was trying to let the reader know that Lee had a more…
- 255 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In the book Killer Angels by Michael Shaara, he analyzes the roles of two important men in Civil War history. One is Robert E. Lee, the commander of the Confederate army, and the other is James Longstreet, a Confederate general. Both men play key parts in the battle of Gettysburg and their choices help direct the course of the whole war, both in their favor and against. While they are fighting on the same side, there are differences that distinguish them and cause conflict between them, and these differences will determine major turning points in the war.…
- 1380 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Ulysses S. Grant delivers his inaugural speech while America still battles with the issues brought on by the Civil War. The American Civil War tore the nation in two, leaving behind a detached set of people who needed a leader in order to regain their nation’s unified greatness. In this speech, he uses rhetorical strategies to reassure the audience, the entirety of the United States of America, that he is that great leader who will work to the best of his ability to unite the North and South once again. He does this by trying to establish credibility with the audience, alluding to the Civil War, and using a determined tone.…
- 879 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
4b. How do Lee’s words contrast with the image of southerners as depicted in the cartoon from Document 3?…
- 631 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Among the events of world history, the Civil War in the USA is one of the central places. Due to this sombre and mourning event, the current population know the names of Abraham Lincoln, John Brown, Ulysses S. Grant, who stood at the head of armies of the northerners; know the names of General Robert E. Lee, who led the armed forces of the slave owners, fanatic Lincoln's assassin named John Wilkes Booth. It is known, how the war ended and who won it. This creates an extremely dramatic history of this war. It is associated with not only the names of the characters, personifying two warring camps, but many battles, sea battles, the most urgent political debate, skillful diplomatic game, and the Union Confederation (during the war, the North and South of the USA were called). It was seeking to obtain the support of the European powers (South) or, on the…
- 821 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
When the Confederate Army General Robert E. Lee surrendered to the Union Army General, Ulysses S. Grant at the Appomattox Courthouse on April 9, 1865, many considered the Civil War to be over. The fact that the North was victorious over the South was accepted and the process of reconstruction began in America. It was never openly discussed on why the North defeated the South. However, the question began to slowly arise over time on why the South lost the Civil War. Many historians have become interested in this question and many reasons have been given on why the South lost the Civil War. Lack of manpower, shortages of supplies, and inferior leadership and government were the three main reasons on why the South was defeated in the Civil War.…
- 1101 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
The American civil war was one of the toughest and deadliest wars in American history. This was where the Confederate States of America fought for their independence. It took place from 1861 when the war broke out till April 9th 1865 when confederate commander Robert E. Lee surrendered at the McLean House in the village of Appomattox Court House. It was one of the earliest true industrial wars. Industrial knowledge was used to produce weapons in mass-production. Steamships and railroads were used to supply troops and the telegraph which was relatively new was used in communication. Practices of total war were being used in the civil war. This shows that this was a tough war that needed the best…
- 963 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays