There were documents providing that the company did, in fact, terminate the position of all “Junior Executive Secretary”. This will be in Company’s favor to prove that they did not unlawfully terminate Ms. Lawson the defendant because of her being pregnant. Subpoenas for Howell Jewelry World appeared to be evidence of the company tweaked agreement from his employers. (McAdams, 2015). The legal department had requested that there be documents inclosing the signed agreement Ms. Lawson signed and several others to present to be in favor of Greene’s Jewelry.
1. The nondisclosure agreement (NDA) the defended signed upon being hired by the company. This will help prove that the defender did, in fact, violate the nondisclosure agreement between her and the company. (Quinn, G. 2017).
2. A subpoena of documents for Howell Jewelry Worlds new process for their new material. I believe that this new process is equivalent to Ever-Gold. (McAdams, 2015).
3. A subpoena of Howell Jewelry World employees requesting documents that were given to them by The Defendant pertaining to the process of Ever-Gold. The Defendant stole certain documents from Greene’s Jewelry and surrendered them to Howell Jewelry World …show more content…
In addition, Lawson disregarded her non- disclosure agreement with the company and stole company documents that exposed vital trade secrets. Howell also acted criminally and should be penalized. Even though Howell knew the trade secrets were stolen by Lawson, he still considered to hire her. Howell disregarded the law intentionally. Lawson’s employment contract with Howell, it is clear that Howell signs the agreement with Lawson only because they need the secret process for creating “Ever-Gold” to mimic it. Greene’s’ should consider bringing a suit against Howell as