Preview

Greene's Jewelry World: Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
969 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Greene's Jewelry World: Case Study
Facts to be Determined:Facts
There were documents providing that the company did, in fact, terminate the position of all “Junior Executive Secretary”. This will be in Company’s favor to prove that they did not unlawfully terminate Ms. Lawson the defendant because of her being pregnant. Subpoenas for Howell Jewelry World appeared to be evidence of the company tweaked agreement from his employers. (McAdams, 2015). The legal department had requested that there be documents inclosing the signed agreement Ms. Lawson signed and several others to present to be in favor of Greene’s Jewelry.
1. The nondisclosure agreement (NDA) the defended signed upon being hired by the company. This will help prove that the defender did, in fact, violate the nondisclosure agreement between her and the company. (Quinn, G. 2017).
2. A subpoena of documents for Howell Jewelry Worlds new process for their new material. I believe that this new process is equivalent to Ever-Gold. (McAdams, 2015).
3. A subpoena of Howell Jewelry World employees requesting documents that were given to them by The Defendant pertaining to the process of Ever-Gold. The Defendant stole certain documents from Greene’s Jewelry and surrendered them to Howell Jewelry World
…show more content…
In addition, Lawson disregarded her non- disclosure agreement with the company and stole company documents that exposed vital trade secrets. Howell also acted criminally and should be penalized. Even though Howell knew the trade secrets were stolen by Lawson, he still considered to hire her. Howell disregarded the law intentionally. Lawson’s employment contract with Howell, it is clear that Howell signs the agreement with Lawson only because they need the secret process for creating “Ever-Gold” to mimic it. Greene’s’ should consider bringing a suit against Howell as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The Defendant was terminated from the position of junior executive secretary at The Company upon the decision by The Company to downsize. The Defendant acquired confidential information upon her departure regarding the process for creating Ever-Gold; a patented process which is fundamental to The Company’s success. Shortly after, The Defendant became an employee for a competitor of The Company, Howell Jewelry World [hereby referred to as Howell]; where she willingly released unknown documents and trademark secrets. The Defendant was required to sign a confidentiality agreement which The Company claims has been violated.…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kuehn V. Pub Zone Summary

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages

    An employer is a special kind of landowner and is in a special relationship with his employees, in that they are present on his facilities every weekday. Burton Woods III was a mail clerk who worked for Monsanto Corporation. His job duties required him to circulate among the female employees in order to deliver mail to the various departments. Ms. Gaines worked as a secretary at Monsanto. The plaintiff alleges that Mr. Woods had made advances upon many of the female employees in the firm, including Ms. Gaines. Mr. Woods had previously been convicted of rape of robbery. Mr. Woods had access to employee files including the employees’ home addresses. Mr. Woods used this access to obtain Ms. Gaines’ home address and, on April 10, 1979, he went to Ms. Gaines’ apartment and murdered her. He was convicted of first degree murder and sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. Ms. Gaines’ parents brought a wrongful death/negligent hiring suit against…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Holding: Speelman should have been granted a preliminary injunction, and her substansive and procedural due process was indeed…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ISSUE: (One or two sentences about what the case is trying to answer – should be in the form of a question). Were the actions of Mrs. Mitchell constituted misconduct under § 59-90-5(b), N.M.S.A.1953?…

    • 340 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This case is about operators of a business and the owners of the strip mall where business was located. The action alleged that the business was a front for prostitution and an illegal massage parlor. A preliminary injunction was issued by trial of court restricting the operation of a massage parlor or a place of prostitution. Pacific Landmark, a restricted liability company and owner of the property and Ron Mavaddat, the Pacific's manager appeal, challenging that the preliminary injunction is disputable in light of the fact that the culpable business has cleared the premises, with the outcome there is no risk of future impairment. Mavaddat likewise opposes, as manager of Pacific,…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    STATEMENT OF THE CASE The matter currently comes before the court on Petitioner Elizabeth Hamilton and counsel’s appeal from the 2nd Circuit award of sanctions under 28 U.S.C § 1927 (2012) for attorney’s fees to Respondent Randall’s Plumbing Supply. (J.A. 8). The initial action was brought by the Petitioner in the Southern District of New York alleging she was wrongfully terminated and seeking to recover against Respondent. (J.A. at 4.)…

    • 2537 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The plaintiff sued the defendants, claiming that she was sexually assaulted and beaten by hospital employees while she was hospitalized. The defendants were granted a dismissal of the case for non pros. The defendants claimed that the plaintiff failed to meet her requirement to file a certificate of merit within 60 days. As a result, the Court of Common Pleas,…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    FACTS: In 1995 William Brotby was hired by Computer Task Group, Inc. (CTG) as an information technologies consultant. Upon hiring, Brotby had to sign an agreement stating that he would be restricted to work for any CTG customers if he left the company. No more than two years later, Brotby left CTG and began to work for one of CTG’s customers known as Alyeska Pipeline Service Company. CTG, plaintiff, filed a suit against Brotby, defendant, in a federal district court alleging breach of contract. During the production of discovery, Brotby refused to fully respond to CTG’s interrogatories, never gave truthful answers, filed unwarranted motions, made flimsy objections, and never disclosed all of the information that CTG sought. Brotby was fined twice by the court and was issued five separate orders ordering him to cooperate. Because of Brothby’s continuous refusal to cooperate, CTG eventually filed a motion to enter default judgment against him in 1999. The court granted the motion; however, Brotby appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Default Judgment 5. Direct Examination 6. Discovery 7. Motion 8. Opening Statement 9.…

    • 18216 Words
    • 73 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I started by analyzing the problem by listing key facts and possible search terms. Possible key facts include that she was in a school-sponsored internship, that Pepper supervised her in several areas, that she was not paid, and that she received various benefits including use of the company car, participation in the firm’s life insurance policy and training. Possible Google search terms might include “intern(ship),” “Title VII employee,” “unpaid,” and “workplace.” Because this case will be brought in the Eastern District of Wisconsin, it will be in the 7th Circuit. I found this out by Googling “Circuit Court map.” The results yielded the U.S. Courts’ “Court Locator” map.…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In my opinion Nichols, was in violation of Garelli Wong’s claim because of the disclosure agreement he had signed while under their employ. Contracts are binding and that is the smoking gun, and that being the case Nichols was in direct violation of that contract, for this reason alone the courts should have found in favor of Garelli Wong, Inc.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Final Assignment

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. The Plaintiff is presently 40 years of age. Plaintiffs’ occupation is Drug Store Manager. Plaintiff resides at 2233 Post Lane, Middletown, Illinois and…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This court case took place in the United States Supreme Court in the Northern District of Indiana. The plaintiff in this court case is Deborah White, represented by Amanda Babbitt and Jackson Walsh. The defendants are Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern, represented by Benjamin Walton and Jordon Van Meter. Deborah White brought this court case to the Supreme Court in order to argue against the summary judgment filed by the defendents. A summary judgment is granted only if all of the written evidence before the court clearly establishes that there are no disputed issues of material fact and that the party who requested the summary…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Betty Biggs Case

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3. Plaintiff Betty Biggs is an Ecuadorian immigrant to the United States. From in or around June 2000 to the present, Ms. Biggs has been an employee at Defendant's Admiral Health in New York City. At all relevant times, Ms. Biggs met the definition of an "employee" under all applicable statutes.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case C – Employment Termination Lydia, a 55 year old women of color was terminated from her computer manufacturing job at Pacifine Technologies, for failure to perform her designated duties according to specifications of her job requirements. In opposition, Lydia believed that her actions were justified due to being forced to work with materials that were potentially harmful her health and safety. Prior to being fired Lydia and other staff members voiced safety concerns to Bud, her direct supervisor. Lydia waged numerous complaints in written form pertaining to work conditions. Even though he was aware that her claims were valid and warranted investigation, all of her concerns were intentionally dismissed, due to Bud’s preoccupation with meeting the company’s quota.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays