The authors champion for racial and gender equality in their literature despite using different approaches. The authors’ first similarities suffice on their urge to inform the people on the relevance of treating each and every person equally. Garrison, for instance, being a strong Christian, she uses her influence to force the church to champion for the rights of women in their organs. Additionally, she forces the politicians through Liberty party to allocate women slots in its governance bodies. Thomas G. Mitchell says “Garrison was also an advocate of the equality of women and wanted the abolitionist movement to promote this by giving women places on its executive body and voting rights within the organization.” Grimke on her part stresses on the need to have all genders treated equally and asked the people to abolish …show more content…
Grimke authoritatively states in church and demands from the religious leaders to echo her statements. Additionally, she gets emotional with a Presbyterian Church minister who privately discusses with her slavery issues but cannot denounce the act public. Truth on her part also shows the need to address the mistreatment of women in public and one of her speeches titled "Ain't I a woman?" has been debated over and over. According to Anderson, “Truth argued forcefully for the rights of women, drawing particular attention to the position of women of color in the social and legal hierarchy of her time.” This is a clear indication that the fellows never bowed down due to the pressure from the antagonists of their mission. They stood their ground and exemplified in ensuring that the message was received and action