Preview

Growth Of Slavery In The United States Between 1776 And 1860

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
812 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Growth Of Slavery In The United States Between 1776 And 1860
The growth and continuation of African American slavery in the United States, between 1776 and 1860, was supported by social, economic, and political forces. As the nation grew and moved westward, the institution of slavery became deeply rooted in American civilization. As this occurred, slavery continued to exist and expand throughout the nation. At the time, the law, also, was not in favor of the slaves, which encouraged the expansion and continuation of slavery. In the South, slavery played a massive role in the agricultural economy as they were the main people who grew cash crops like rice, tobacco, and indigo. Slaves were the most useful at this job because they were often cheaper to have than other workers. Cotton gin, created by Eli …show more content…
The 1787 draft of the United States Constitution, included many clauses that supported the institution of slavery. For instance, the Three-Fidths Compromise increased the political might of Southern states by counting enslaved people as three-fifths of a person for determining congressional representation (Philbrick). To estimate a state’s overall population for legislative representation and taxation, the state would count three out of every five enslaved people (Philbrick). The Fugitive Slave Clause also established legal rules for slavery by commanding the enslaved people who had run away from their owners to return. As the United States grew westward, the need for slavery in the states also grew. The United States Congress passed the Missouri Compromise of 1820 to accept the problems of slavery and the admission of new states into the Union (Missouri Compromise). The agreement established a balance between the free states and enslaved person states while establishing a border for future locations of free and enslaved person states by admitting Maine as a free state and Missouri as a slave state (Missouri …show more content…
The Compromise of 1850 addressed the enduring issues of slavery and its spread into the new territories of the United States (Compromise of 1850). This was a significant event that took place before the American Civil War. On May 30, 1854, the United States Congress passed the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, which was an important piece of American legislation (Kansas-Nebraska Act). Senator Stephan A. Douglas of Illinois was the main promoter of this act, which was planned to solve the issue of the division of territories in the western part of the nation and the issue of westward expansion. Slavery continued because of racist beliefs imposed by superiors representing African Americans as lower in status and suitable for the roles of slaves. These ideologies were deeply rooted in American culture and deemed fair to justify the use of African Americans as slaves. In 1857, the Supreme Court published the Dred Scott judgment to declare that enslaved people were hardly considered citizens but rather pieces of property, and denied them the right to file any claims for freedom (Dred Scott v.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    sample orr and ozark mo

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During the elections of 1860, the United States was divided by decisions concerning slavery. The Missouri territory came to the United States as part of the 1803 Louisiana Purchase. The House of Representatives put forward an amendment to the admission of Missouri that would prohibit the introduction of slaves into Missouri and freeing the children of slaves at the age of 25. The Senate passed the bill admitting Missouri without the amendment, but it was rejected by the House, pushing the controversy into 1820. The Great Compromiser, Henry Clay, proposed the following elements of a sectional compromise: That Missouri be admitted to the Union as a slave state (as the population of the territory apparently desired).That slavery was to be prohibited from the new American territories in the Louisiana Purchase north of 36/30’ north latitude (the southern boundary of Missouri). States to the south of the line (the new Arkansas Territory) would decide the slavery issue for themselves. Missouri became the 24th state on August 10, 1821. The Missouri Compromise was canceled in 1854 with the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition, there were some major Civil War laws of the Western Expansion, such as the Missouri Compromise of 1820, the Compromise of 1850, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was an effort to conserve a balance of power between the slaveholding states and free states, by the U.S Senate and the House of Reps. The slaveholding states feared of being outnumbered in the Congressional Representation. They feared because they would lack the power to protect their interest in property and trade. After much debate the law passed the Senate on March 2nd, 1820 and passed the House of Reps on February 26th, 1821.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise was written in the year of 1820 on March 3rd and was also passed on the same day. This compromise approved Missouri to come to America as a slave state, but conserved the correspondence between the North and the South by modeling the land of Maine out of Massachusetts and stopping slavery from territories accomplished in the Louisiana Purchase which is the north of the line of 36 30’ and this is the southern boundary of Missouri. The South and the North was not satisfied with the Missouri Compromise because many southern congressmen balloted to oppose the compromise. They opposed it because the limit on future slavery in the territories was not excessively abusive to the slave owners. It was abusive to them because the…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debate over slavery arose again after the Mexican-American War, when Congress had to decide the status of new territory acquired from Mexico. Although the Constitution gave Congress no ability to rid the nation of slavery, it allowed for Congress to determine the qualification future state's admission. This made it possible for a majority of either section to manipulate a new state's status through making the abolition or the protection of slavery necessary for the state to become organized. An earlier compromise in 1820, was the result of a struggle for sectional control over the status of Missouri. Congress choose to appease both sides by admitting Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state. The compromise created a westward line dividing the…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise was the resolution to the conflict involving those for slavery (the South) against those opposed to slavery (the North). Antagonism between the North and the South began to emerge in 1820 when Missouri applied to the United States as a slave state. At the time, in 1819, the United States had exactly eleven slave states and exactly eleven free states; by allowing Missouri into the nation, that balance would be disrupted and the Senate would be spiked towards the South. Missouri was admitted into the nation, however, the House approved an amendment outlawing any imported slaves from Africa to Missouri and set the children of slaves free. Ultimately the Senate rejected the amendment forcing Missouri out of the nation.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Missouri Compromise, (1820), in U.S. history, measure worked out between the North and the South and passed by the U.S. Congress that allowed for admission of Missouri as the 24th state (1821). It marked the beginning of the prolonged sectional conflict over the extension of slavery that led to the American Civil War.…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Us History 1 Study Guide

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Missouri Compromise = A series of agreements passed by congress in 1820-1821 to maintain the balance of power between slave state and free states…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Missouri Compromise

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It allowed Missouri to be added as a slave state while Maine was established as a free state to maintain balance amongst the Union. This compromise was later negated by the Kansas-Nebraska Act put in place in 1854. According to Eric Foner, he states, “During the next two years, the Whig Party, unable to develop a unified response to the political crisis, collapsed. From a region divided between the two parties, the South became solidly Democratic... disgruntled Democrats, joined a new organization, the Republican Party, dedicated to preventing the further expansion of slavery” (Foner 512). Passed in 1854 The Kansas-Nebraska Act created a more sectional America because settlers could not determine the status of slavery among these territories by themselves. This led to events like Bleeding Kansas which was caused because when it came time to use their popular sovereignty to vote on whether to outlaw slavery or not people from other the states, like Missouri, would cross over the border and cast votes which led to elections being invalidated and having to be done over again on other days. Bleeding Kansas also led to many acts of violence that held political anti-slavery sentiments. However, the actual act itself states that it will leave the states “...created into a temporary government by the name of the Territory Nebraska; and... shall be received into the Union with or without slavery, as their constitution may prescribe at the time of the admission…" (The Kansas- Nebraska Act). The act had went against the Missouri Compromise because Stephen A. Douglas passed this bill to give territorial governments to Kansas and Nebraska which had allowed them to use popular sovereignty to make their decisions. This negates the Missouri Compromise because it disrupted the balance of admitting every other state as a free state. Also, it…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott case: Dred Scott was an enslaved African American man in the United States who sued for the freedom of himself his wife and their two daughters. Mr. Scott unsuccessfully won the case of Dred Scott v. Sandford of 1857, which was otherwise known as the "Dred Scott Decision." The Dred Scott case was regarded as one of the worst supreme court decisions of all times. It stated that nor free or enslave African Americans could be American…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    States were starting to be admitted into the Union more rapidly and with each addition, there was the debate of whether it would be a slave state or a free state. The Missouri Compromise had been passed in 1820, which stated that new states north of 36°30 ' would be “free” and states south of the same line would be “slave”. Then in 1854, the Kansas-Nebraska Act created the territories of Kansas and Nebraska and gave those settlers the right to choose for themselves if they would allow slavery. This effectively repelled the Missouri Compromise which angered many Americans.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution acted primarily as a source of sectional discord because it sanctioned the institution of slavery in the eyes of the South. The southern states held that “Slave States contribute mainly… to the acquisition of [new states],” and constitution-ally, must be allowed to “carry their property into their own land” (Document B). This southern belief created a divide between the constitutional issue of property and the moral issues of whether a human being is considered property or whether “a man’s right to liberty is as inalienable as his right to life” (Document D). Similarly, in the case of Dred Scott vs. Sanford, the Supreme Court decided that “people of African ancestry… were not intended to be included under the word ‘citizens’ in the Constitution” and are therefore not “entitled to all the rights, and privileges, and immunities, guarantied by [being a] citizen,” furthering the idea that slaves were private property (Finkelman). This division in moral belief versus the unclear concept of property in the Constitution allowed the South to believe that seceding was, in fact, a necessary, constitutional act.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1820 the new territory on Missouri applied for statehood, this was the spark that turned into a flame with the debate over slave vs Free states. This became known as the Missouri Compromise. It caused tensions because it was west of the Mississippi River and outside the boundaries of the Union. In order to keep the states balanced, Congress came to the decision of making Missouri a slave state and Maine a slave state.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    APSUH Slavery DBQ

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Conversely, slavery spread with the invention of the cotton gin. Eli Whitney believed it would make cotton production easier, but instead made a demand for more slaves; in 1830, slavery had spread all over the…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tensions between the north and the south came to a head after Missouri’s 1819 request for admission to the Union as a slave state, which threatened to upset the balance between slave states and free states. To keep the peace, Congress organized a two-part compromise in 1820 called the Missouri Compromise. This compromise granted Missouri’s request but also admitted Maine as a free state. It also passed an amendment that drew an imaginary line across the former Louisiana Territory, establishing a boundary between free and slave states that remained the law of the land until it was negated by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. This policy promoted sectionalism as it continued the separation of states but for the time being, put the argument over slavery at ease.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States was divided on slavery and the Norther States abolished slavery while the southern states embraced it. The northern states above the Missouri Compromise of 1820 did not allow slavery. The United States economy played an important role in slavery were it either strengthened or weakened it. The northern states did not have a strong agricultural business due to the type of hard and rocky soil that proved…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays