Preview

Compare Missouri Compromise And The Circumstantial Panic Of 1819

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
The Missouri Compromise was written in the year of 1820 on March 3rd and was also passed on the same day. This compromise approved Missouri to come to America as a slave state, but conserved the correspondence between the North and the South by modeling the land of Maine out of Massachusetts and stopping slavery from territories accomplished in the Louisiana Purchase which is the north of the line of 36 30’ and this is the southern boundary of Missouri. The South and the North was not satisfied with the Missouri Compromise because many southern congressmen balloted to oppose the compromise. They opposed it because the limit on future slavery in the territories was not excessively abusive to the slave owners. It was abusive to them because the …show more content…

The Missouri Compromise and the circumstantial panic of 1819 should have darkened the constitutional figure in that time period which was President Monroe, but it did not. These bitter events had a discouraging result on the Era of Good Feelings. This caused President Monroe to collect all of the electoral votes except for one in the presidential election of 180. He was the only president to be reelected after one term of being president in which the main business panic began. The Era of Good Feelings was not completely peaceful and also the panic of 1819 and the Missouri Compromise. The lawmaking argument on the Missouri Compromise had awakened those tensions and they were later provoked by a stop of a slave rebellion in Charleston in 1822. All in all, the Missouri Compromise claimed that the majority of the western territories obtained in the Louisiana Purchase were always closed to slavery in the north of the state of Missouri. Senator Stephen A. Douglas’s Kansas-Nebraska scheme absolutely challenged the Missouri Compromise, which had banned slavery in the arranged Nebraska Territory north of the protected 36 30’

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Missouri Compromise

    • 263 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Give two ordered pairs that are solutions and two ordered pairs that are not solutions.…

    • 263 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    sample orr and ozark mo

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During the elections of 1860, the United States was divided by decisions concerning slavery. The Missouri territory came to the United States as part of the 1803 Louisiana Purchase. The House of Representatives put forward an amendment to the admission of Missouri that would prohibit the introduction of slaves into Missouri and freeing the children of slaves at the age of 25. The Senate passed the bill admitting Missouri without the amendment, but it was rejected by the House, pushing the controversy into 1820. The Great Compromiser, Henry Clay, proposed the following elements of a sectional compromise: That Missouri be admitted to the Union as a slave state (as the population of the territory apparently desired).That slavery was to be prohibited from the new American territories in the Louisiana Purchase north of 36/30’ north latitude (the southern boundary of Missouri). States to the south of the line (the new Arkansas Territory) would decide the slavery issue for themselves. Missouri became the 24th state on August 10, 1821. The Missouri Compromise was canceled in 1854 with the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Missouri Compromise- The south wanted Missouri as a slave state to have more southern representation in the Senate. The north however, did not. Henry Clay created the Missouri compromise:…

    • 1933 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Political compromise in the later years of the Ante-Bellum Period, specifically from 1820-1861, are crucial when speaking in terms of causes of the Civil War. Though the government and politics of such tried fiercly to reduce sectionalist tensions, in the end they were unsuccessful. Out of all the reasons- political and not- the four things within those years that strike most as failures of the government are the Missouri Compromise of 1820, the Wilmot Proviso of 1848, the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, and the Presidential Election of 1860.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Missouri Compromise was created in 1820 to put an end to the conflict between the slave and non-slave states, however, it only caused the conflict to worsen. The dispute began to get worse and worse, eventually making the sectionalism between the North and South increase. The Missouri Compromise ignited sectionalism within the United States, which further contributed to a terrible War.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Missouri Compromise Dbq

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise is commonly thought of as the beginning of American sectionalism, although the signs were visible long before 1819. The crisis solved by the compromise certainly alerted the South for the need for political unity in order to maintain its way of life in the face of a more populous North. Likewise, it alerted both regions to the political problems inherent in westward expansion. The Missouri Compromise did not create sectionalism, but it is important as the first possible signs of sectionalist differences in the US.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition, there were some major Civil War laws of the Western Expansion, such as the Missouri Compromise of 1820, the Compromise of 1850, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was an effort to conserve a balance of power between the slaveholding states and free states, by the U.S Senate and the House of Reps. The slaveholding states feared of being outnumbered in the Congressional Representation. They feared because they would lack the power to protect their interest in property and trade. After much debate the law passed the Senate on March 2nd, 1820 and passed the House of Reps on February 26th, 1821.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the beginning of westward expansion, the issue of slavery in the newly settles territory became an important and dividing political issue. The Missouri Compromise tried to reach an agreement between the North and South, admitting Maine as a free state, but Missouri as a slave state. Although the Missouri Compromise was unsuccessful in satisfying the North and South, it was important in that it marked the boundary for slavery in the territory…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, who was involved? The sides that were involved in the Missouri Compromise were the north and the south. The North wanted slavery to end and the South wanted to expand slavery across America. But if we are being completely specific the states that were directly affected by this were Missouri and Maine. Maine wanted to be some…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Until the 1850s the nation precariously balanced the slavery issue. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was the first serious argument over the expansion of slavery into newly acquired western territory and also revealed fissures between the Second Party System of Whigs and Democrats in the North and the South. Whigs, while not an abolitionist party, believed a strong government served as the protector of Republican principles. The Democrats, on the other hand, emphasized the right of individual states to create and enforce laws. Ultimately, the parties compromised and prohibited slavery in the former Louisiana Territory north of the parallel 36°30′ except within the boundaries of the proposed state of Missouri.…

    • 179 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But, many of the northern senators were hesitant to allow Missouri to become a slave state because there were already 11 free states and 11 slave states and the northern senators did not want too much representation from slave state senators. Also, Missouri was the the west of the Mississippi and Ohio rivers so it was not required to follow the Northwest Ordinance Act leading to the confusion of whether it was a slave state or a free state. The northern senators argued that slavery was an immoral sin and should be abolished while the southern senators argued that slavery was justified in the constitution and that they had the right to keep slaves if they wanted to. To keep a balance of pro-slavery senators and free-state senators, Henry Clay proposed the Missouri Compromise which stated that Missouri would be a slave state if Maine was accepted as a free state. It further drew the 36-30 parallel to create a division for which states would be free and which would be slave-owning.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise, one of the most known agreements in American history, was an attempt presented by Henry Clay in calming sectional division between the Northern and Southern states over the issue of slavery. While the Missouri Compromise found a temporary solution in regards to representation resulting in twelve free states and twelve slave states(G), it also, however, ignited the strong feelings, opinions, and justifications of two opposing sides and "heralded" the future unsuccess of the Union. No longer could our forefathers postpone such an imminent issue as was done during the infancy of the United States government. The Missouri Compromise was a success in a sense, not merely because of its contents, but rather because it caused people to voice their angered opinions about slavery, unavoidably causing the government to realize the importance of finding a genuine solution to the reality of slavery if the future of America was to survive and truly be united.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Missouri Compromise reflected regional differences toward slavery in that the North and South had opposite opinions about the issue. The North was against using slaves while the South was for it. The 36-30 latitude line essentially divided the country between North and South, as the area above the line prohibited slavery, which they were fine with anyways as the North didn’t use and was against using slaves. The area below the line and Missouri were allowed to use slaves, which made sense as the area below the line was the South, who actually used the slaves and didn’t want to end the use of the slave system. This 36-30 latitude line was a physical reflection of the differing viewpoints on slavery between the North and the South, as it reflected the ideals of the North and…

    • 2099 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was an effort by the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives to maintain a balance of power between the slaveholding states and Free states. The slaveholding states feared that if they became outnumbered in Congressional representation that they would lack the power to protect their interests in property and trade.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The political compromise during the period of 1820 to 1860 was unable to reduce sectional tension during this time period. According to Tom Meltzer and Jean H. Bennett, in their book CRACKING THE AP U.S. HISTORY EXAM, “The new period of expansion resulted in a national debate over slavery, as would every period of expansion to follow until the Civil War resolved the slavery question.” The Missouri Compromise, the Compromise of 1850, and… were just a quick fix for the inevitable to come, the civil war. The political compromises of this time period were not able to meet their final goal, primarily because of misunderstandings…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays