Preview

Gun Control Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
842 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gun Control Research Paper
SCCC - Narrow Focus and Specific Goals
Throughout the long and storied history of the United States of America, the right to own, bear and keep firearms, along with the right to defend oneself, is as central to the American identity as apple pie. However, unlike American cuisine, the issue of “gun politics” (as many academics and pundits call the issue) or gun control in the United States is extremely polarizing. During the last couple decades, the debate over gun control has been characterized by a stalemate between the individual's right to own firearms protected by the Constitution and the duty of government to prevent crime and maintain order. Stated differently, the current debate surrounding the right to bear and keep firearms within
…show more content…
Called the Students for Concealed and Carry on Campus, this pro-gun rights group struck me for a couple of reasons. The first reason that I was attracted to this group was because I personally side with and subscribe to the overall philosophy and arguments of the pro-gun rights movement. The second reason that I was attracted to this particular interest group was the specific and very focused nature of their overall goals and objectives. As it states on their website, the SCCC is, “a national, non-partisan, grassroots organization composed of more than 43,000 college students, professors, college employees, parents of college students, and concerned citizens who believe that holders of state-issued concealed handgun licenses should be allowed the same measure of personal protection on college campuses that current laws afford them virtually everywhere else.” After the tragedy of Virginia Tech and the University of Texas-Austin, their common sense message of self-defense and the right to bear arms on college campuses appealed to me as an individual. Lastly, the groups successful adoption of Facebook and Twitter to broadcast (or in some senses, narrowcast) their message also made them appealing and interesting. Personally, I first came to learn about this movement after a friend of mine from Virginia Tech invited me to join the SCCC’s …show more content…
Other names for this issue are Second Amendment Rights, Gun Control, etc. For the purposes of this blog, I will stick with the term Gun Control
[ 2 ]. Specifically, the author’s state: "For many years this policy arena has been characterized by stalemate between an organized outspoken minority and an ambivalent majority.” See The changing politics of gun control by Clyde Wilcox and John W. Bruce (1998 – p4).
[ 3 ]. Specifically, the author’s state: "For many years this policy arena has been characterized by stalemate between an organized outspoken minority and an ambivalent majority.” See The changing politics of gun control by Clyde Wilcox and John W. Bruce (1998 – p4).
[ 4 ]. See Who We Are and What We Do at the NRA’s website. URL: http://www.nraila.org/About/
[ 5 ]. See Mission Statement on the Brady Campaigns website. URL

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Therefore, both Soudani and Grisez have persuasive reasons for or against gun control. Their opinions represent the two contradicting attitudes towards gun-control laws. One group prefers tighter restrictions on firearms selling and circulation. However, the other group views it as an infringement of their Second Amendment rights ("Gun Control"). All in all, an examination of gun-control laws, from various perspectives, reveals we should implement moderate regulations to find a common ground instead of polarizing the political and social…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the article, “After Scalise Shooting, a Twist: Lawmakers Want to Loosen Gun Laws” by Emily Cochrane demonstrates the politics of gun control. After the recent Scalise shooting at a baseball field, gun control laws have been put into the spotlight. A debate between lawmakers who want to loosen gun control laws and lawmakers who want to make them stricter. After the Conservative lawmakers were almost victims, they decided that they should be able to have a concealed weapon on them. Being shot at gave them a different perspective on gun control and felt that it should be less intense. They felt that no matter what, “the bad guys are always going to get guns” (Cochrane). Even today, there is still debate on how strict gun control laws should…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to the article, “Leaders: America and Guns,” it is evident that gun control has proven ineffective when it comes to dissolving the “love affair” that exists between Americans and their guns (“Leaders: America and Guns”). This article highlights the issues that permeate throughout America regarding pro gun groups. Not only is this article persuasive, it infuses a degree of rhetorical strategies including logical, as well as emotional appeals to fortify the issue at hand. Various examples, statistics, and sound evidence is brought to the table, adequately arguing and developing the position that, “Americans want to keep their guns, no matter how high the price,” (“Leaders: America and Guns”). Furthermore, the other article, “Support for Gun Control Legislation,”…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun control policies and measures seem to be divided on the federal level. Compromised legislation that would have banned semiautomatic weapons and expanded…

    • 946 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author’s opinions and sources of information are very credible. He obtained statistics from the National Rifle Association and Michael Waldman, and he has worked for large newspapers for over 10…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    for stricter gun control laws. This paper argues that firearms continue to play a dominant…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    “A Senate in the Gun Lobby’s Grip” was published in the New York Times as a powerful rhetorical analysis that persuades the audience that gun control does not mean…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gobry, P. (2014, Jane 16) Both Sides Are Wrong on the Gun Debate. Here’s Why. The Week.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The debate over Gun control and our second amendment which allows individuals the right to bear arms, has been a very hot topic for the past few years. With the break out of terrorist attacks and massacre shootings across America, this topic has really stirred up some heated debates and divided the American people. Such is the case in the article written by Kirk Johnson on a debate which took place in the state of Oregon between Governor Kate Brown and Sheriff John Hanlin, over gun control laws. Below you will find my analysis on Johnson’s article, examining his methods to inform the readers on such a hot and debatable topic.…

    • 111 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control advocates focus on the serious negative effects on gun availability on safety, while gun ownership advocates emphasize the lawful use of guns and their place in our history and culture. While our history and culture is important we need to address the current national problem in order to live in a safe enough society. In an effort to stabilize and decrease firearm related injuries and deaths in the U.S. a strong federal law to control guns is needed. In the bigger picture, we people will see the United States, as a Nation, as a better safer place to live in and not to die…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Discussion Post

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gun control advocates do have a moral obligation to reveal their true intentions regarding the ultimate consequences and potentially obscure implications of the policies that they espouse. By attempting to prohibit firearms incrementally, yet failing to inform the public of their true intentions, these organizations deceive and manipulate individuals who only support moderate gun controls into unknowingly advancing a cause (prohibition of guns) that they may not necessarily stand for (Kleck, 2001). Moderate gun control supporters are thusly being used as pons by organizations who help them achieve their more moderate goals, only to then move on to more extreme controls that moderate gun control supporters may not have originally supported. To omit information or true intent for the purpose of fulfilling a political goal, however well-intentioned, is deceitful and immoral, especially when the strategy relies on the support of misled individuals supporting more than originally bargained for.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    They’re many different biased opinions related to the topic of public policy and gun control. Many would argue that gun control doesn’t follow public policy in a “normal” route. “Normal” being shocking incidents or crises that draw public attention and media coverage which in turn draw a debate on one or more aspects of the issue wither it be a philosophical, regulatory, constitutional, or technical aspect. Following this, investigations that would result in an actual change in public policy to further prevent or at least deter another reoccurrence of this action. The shooting of Unites States Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and the massacre at the Aurora, Colorado movie theatre are two examples of incidents that should have led to the investigation of the downside of the current public policy with gun control. The debate of deciphering the 2nd amendment has and will always be an ongoing debate. While various federal laws have been enacted since 1934 to promote the regulation of firearms, each fifty states still have different laws according to the severity of restrictions condoned by citizens, and placed by the legislators. They’re then the plethora of laws that decipher the use and possession of these firearms.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Until today, Americans have not reached consensus on gun-control laws. People who disagree with stricter laws have been saying that "more guns help protect citizens" because with guns they can defend themselves. However, people who support more restrictive regulations claim that loose gun-control leads to an insecure society ("Gun Control"). Because both sides have persuasive reasons for or against gun-control laws, we should implement moderate regulations to find a common ground instead of polarizing the…

    • 76 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One group of individuals innocently trusts that without firearms, criminal violence would be diminished. Opponents to such line of thought believe that absence of fire arms deprives people the right of leisure in games like game ranging, and protection from domestic aggressors. The belief is that there are variety of situations that are not actively protected within the police functionality, and can be avoided through gun ownership. However, all citizens of the United States accept that guns are combat weapons that can bring about damage, killing, or destruction. Guns can be utilized by people to safeguard and secure or to undermine, threaten others, and kill. As students in college, it is very important for us to stay informed…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control Is Needed

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Regulation of guns is a necessary action that needs to be taken in order to…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays