Robert introduces his idea about legislative recommendations to control gun violence by demonstrating the political fact of gun control from mental illness. First, Robert explains the readership between gun
violence and mental illness and remarks the aims of this article is to stimulus a dispute about underexplored dimensions of the firearm use disadvantages and recovery process. Then, Robert discusses the importance of policies, and how the courts take the responsibility of restore gun rights. After that, Robert questions the report’s proposal that declaration from a mental health expert should be compulsive at gun rights rebuilding a program. In the end, the author inspects the facts of gun rights removal and offers elective perspectives to the functional weaknesses in the Consortium’s reports.