Preview

Hamilton vs. Jefferson: Political Philosophies of the 1800s

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1132 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hamilton vs. Jefferson: Political Philosophies of the 1800s
Two competing political philosophies have always existed throughout the United States’ relatively short history: one seeking to increase the power of the central government, and one seeking to decrease it. During the 1800s these two conflicting philosophies were acted out by the Federalist and the Democratic Republican parties, respectively. The Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton, advocated the importance of a strong central government in leading the country forward, while the Democratic Republicans, led by Thomas Jefferson, promoted increasing the common man’s role in government. Although both political parties had good intentions for the future of the United States, the Federalist Party was much more effective at uniting the American people, avoiding domestic faction, and keeping the best interests in mind for the future of the United States.
The early 1800s were a difficult time for the American people; they had just won their independence from Britain hardly more than twenty or thirty years prior, and the threat of failure still loomed large. The Federalist Party sought to destroy the threat of failure by strengthening the United States’ central government. As Alexander Hamilton said, “A firm Union will be of the utmost moment to the peace and liberty of the states, as a barrier against domestic faction and insurrection.” In Hamilton’s mind, strengthening the central government would ensure freedom for every American citizen by uniting the people to think and speak with a single voice. Hamilton had witnessed firsthand the political and economic confusion caused by states’ conflicting interests and corrupt taxation policies under the Articles of Confederation. He realized that the only way for the Union to survive and prosper was for the Federal government to take control of the country’s political and economic decision-making. With a strong Federal power in place, troublesome interstate conflicts could be solved swiftly and decisively, before they gained

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    How did Jefferson’s ideals of government differ from those of Hamilton? Jefferson believed in strong states which would in return better control the government while also benefiting us while Hamilton believed in strong central government where the states would have limited power and the elite would have a say in government while also basing the economy on industry and large national debt.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the “Federalist No. 15” Alexander Hamilton is pointing out the deficiencies of the existing confederation. He initiates his discussion by stating that the Articles of Confederation have been constructed under a faulty foundation that have worsen due to fallacious arguments and the lack of unionship. Hamilton realizes that the defects of the national government have been pushed aside far too long and have not been addressed properly. His purpose in the article is to pinpoint the leakage and rebuild the structure of the government with “felicity and prosperity” (7), whereas the existing confederate system has been patching up their errors in hopes the citizens do not notice. Hamilton thrives to unite the states by building on the idea of the creation of a…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton and Jefferson were chosen Apart from it being his priority to keep positive relationships with other countries, Jefferson kept good communication with France after Genet’s misfortune. Even after “the Terror” in France, Jefferson stood by the beliefs and actions of France. Hamilton was a Federalist that in the now would be referred to Republicans. The ideas were similar to those of Europe, allowing for Federal Government to have more control and a monarchy control.…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton were on opposing sides when Hamilton announced plans for a national bank. They both organized themselves into 2 political parties: Republicans, led by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, and the Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton and John Adams. Alexander Hamilton stood for the interests of seaports, while Thomas Jefferson spoke for rural and southern interests. Primarily the debate between Jefferson and Hamilton was about concerns of power of the central government and power of states. Federalists were in favor of government power, while the Republicans favored states’ power.…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The founding father generation of 1789 established a new government under the constitution. Interpreting the constitution soon became the debate in the world of politics. Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson both had distinguished point of views during George Washington’s presidency. As a result, a the two party system emerged, consisting of the Federalists, Hamilton, and the Democratic-Republicans, Jefferson and James Madison. However, to some extent, president Jefferson and Madison expressed Hamilton’s view of government and the constitution during their reign as president.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hamiltonian, Lieutenant- colonel, First U.S. Secretary of the Treasury and Secretary of State and spent his time devoted to the rich and wealthy individuals of Virginia. Though I have little knowledge on today’s congress, senate, and military. What I do remember is that what we have in common with Hamilton is,” Strong central government, order and organization, Industrial development, Helped establish a financial credit for the U.S. government. Hamilton had a firm belief that the rich, powerful and well educated should have the control on the government. Which in all honesty looking at today modern times, I can fully agree that the much upper class controlling the government, why? To be blunt money talks in future and I’m sure during 1780s and 90s it did as well, the rich and well educated people would rather spend his or her tax money on what they believe is right each upper class individual have a grasp on politics. Hamilton’s strong belief is still going strong today and being applied through the Senate Congress…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The book, Jefferson and Hamilton: A Rivalry that Forged the Nation, written by John E. Ferling was published on October 1, 2013. John E. Ferling has written other books in this subject area. Some of his other works include: The Loyalist Mind, A Wilderness of Miseries, and Almost a Miracle. Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton are the main characters. Although, John Adams is a secondary characters who play a significant role in this nonfiction literature.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson and his group of republicans had no patience with the federalists view that only the “best people” should rule. To Democratic-Republicans, this view came close to monarchy, or rule by a king. Democratic-Republicans believed that the best government was the one that governed the least. A small government with limited powers was most likely to leave the people alone to enjoy the blessings of liberty. To keep the national government small, they insisted on a strict construction, or interpretation, of the Constitution. Opposingly, Alexander Hamilton and his group of federalists believed that the country should be ruled but the best people, educated wealthy public spirited man like themselves. People that had the tims education and background to run the country wisely. Federalists favored a strong national government, they believed in loose construction, a government's powers under the constitution to unite of the states were not nealy as important as national power and unity. They wanted one powerful national government to run the entire…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The origins of the Federalist and Democratic-Republican parties can be traced back to the early 1790s. Initially, the Federalists, or broad constructionists, favored the growth of federal power and a strong central government. The Federalists promulgated a loose interpretation of the Constitution, which meant that they believed that the government could do anything by the implied powers of the Constitution or that congress had the right to interpret the Constitution based on connotation. On the contrary, the Democratic-Republicans favored the protection of states’ rights and the strict containment of federal power. The Democratic-Republicans were strict constructionists and they believed only in the enumerated powers of the Constitution. Up until 1800, these descriptions of the two political parties were very accurate. However during the period of 1801-1817, the Jefferson and Madison’s presidencies reveal that these characterizations were accurate only to a certain extent. These characterizations became inaccurate when Jefferson, Madison, and Monroe stepped up in power as president and were forced to compromise their political views for the benefit of the country in the face of war, economic pressure, and threats to the Union.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rather than the best vision of a future, one must have the best suited vision to lead a country. In America, two political parties formed called the Federalists and Democratic Republicans. They formed due to the different views of Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton, two secretaries of Washington’s Cabinet. White Jefferson was a Secretary of State, Hamilton was Secretary of Treasury who had very distinct and opposing views regarding the ruling of America. However Jefferson had the best plan for America as he knew the people and wanted to keep liberty for all with experiences.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the French Revolution when the U.S. had to make a decision to help the French, help the British, or stay neutral, many political parties were formed. The French aided America when they were in the midst of war with Great Britain. The U.S. and France agreed on a treaty, promising mutual military support if either country were to get in another war with the British. There were two main groups that formed due to the different opinions of what the U.S. should do during the time of war. Thomas Jefferson, and Alexander Hamilton both were heads of forming the major political party groups. There were people who supported Thomas Jefferson’s political point of view, and they were known as Democratic Republicans. They thought that the U.S. should help the French. Jefferson’s letter…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dreary roads traveled through harsh, perilous conditions forming the nervous system of a newly independent America. Amongst these pathways, the press restlessly distributed papers of competing politicians, on one hand carrying the aggressive writings of Alexander Hamilton and his promotion of federalist, and the other carrying lectures on Jefferson’s vision of a strong, centralized government.…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton, the leader of the Federalists, and his party believed in a loose interpretation of the Constitution. This means they think that certain powers not specifically given to the federal government was more or less implied. Hamilton says “The people are turbulent and changing; they seldom judge or determine right.” He and the Federalists think the government needs more control to run its…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Jefferson often showed a strong dislike for the Federalist laws and programs, when he took office he left many of the Federalist programs intact, and except for revoking the excise tax, the Hamiltonian system was mostly left as it was. However, this act of Jefferson’s went against many of the political beliefs held by his party and himself. Jefferson and Hamilton’s philosophies differed greatly in that Jefferson adhered to a weak central government, with most of the power in the hands of the states. He believed that the federal government’s power should be restrained and limited, so that it would not be able to become tyrannical or try and undermine the power of the states and the people.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hamiltonian Federalism- Alexander Hamilton wanted to form a strong union with the states and federal government. He sought an increase in the power/control of the federal government over the individual states. Hamilton also wanted a bank of the State so that loans could be put out to manufacturers and commercial enterprises. He felt like it was necessary to create a large national debt so that the government's credit would be built up over time. Finally, he wanted to place/raise tariffs on foreign goods to promote American manufacturing and the affordability of the products.…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays