He isn’t as dramatic as Tennant’s Hamlet, but displays genuine emotions nevertheless. Then mid-speech he rushes down the stairs to a platform. It’s great that in this version Hamlet and the audience see Claudius and Gertrude directly from above. The view triggers and accompanies Hamlet’s reactions: He curses at them with anger and disgust on his face, which is in contrast to the smile on Tennant’s. He also carves and strikes at the stones with his sword, as opposed to “carving” his own hand. He is furious and about to kill Claudius with his sword like what he does to the stones. Gibson’s interpretation of Hamlet is quite different from Tennant’s and perhaps also the general consensus: his is more of a soldier, direct and ready to act. The two Hamlet films pose very different renditions of the scene. In general, I’ve found the simple, natural, yet convincing acting and the unique interpretations in the 1990 version rather refreshing, but the modern, science-fiction like atmosphere and the psychological intensity of the 2009 version are also fascinating and well made. If one may say that the 2009 version shines in its style, then the 1990 version certainly captivates in its
He isn’t as dramatic as Tennant’s Hamlet, but displays genuine emotions nevertheless. Then mid-speech he rushes down the stairs to a platform. It’s great that in this version Hamlet and the audience see Claudius and Gertrude directly from above. The view triggers and accompanies Hamlet’s reactions: He curses at them with anger and disgust on his face, which is in contrast to the smile on Tennant’s. He also carves and strikes at the stones with his sword, as opposed to “carving” his own hand. He is furious and about to kill Claudius with his sword like what he does to the stones. Gibson’s interpretation of Hamlet is quite different from Tennant’s and perhaps also the general consensus: his is more of a soldier, direct and ready to act. The two Hamlet films pose very different renditions of the scene. In general, I’ve found the simple, natural, yet convincing acting and the unique interpretations in the 1990 version rather refreshing, but the modern, science-fiction like atmosphere and the psychological intensity of the 2009 version are also fascinating and well made. If one may say that the 2009 version shines in its style, then the 1990 version certainly captivates in its