Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Hamlet, Divine Intervention and the Natural Order

Better Essays
1495 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hamlet, Divine Intervention and the Natural Order
The first part of the theory is that of Divine Intervention - this being the easier of the two parts to explain.

This works off the idea that some manner of God or All-Powerful Force does actually exist. Divine Intervention is, therefore, the notion that this God can manipulate the world either through direct or indirect action.

In the text and film, for instance, the Ghost comes as a messenger from this God, motivating Hamlet to do its will. This is both an example of direct divine intervention - in the appearance of the Ghost; and indirect divine intervention - as the God uses Hamlet to carry out its deeds.

The second part of the concept is the Natural Order of the world. This can be brought down to its base form as: 'What is supposed to happen. ' Unfortunately, it isn 't that simple. The Natural Order exists always, however is not always followed. This 'breaking away ' from the Order is usually the result of Human Intervention, developing one of two outcomes.

These are: either the Natural Order is re-aligned, or the world remains a corrupt and terrible place until such time as the first outcome is realised. So, the world is repaired, or an unending loop of badness ensues until it is.

In the play, the Order was broken when Claudius killed King Hamlet, and from the opening lines the 'wrongness ' that lingers in the air is noted, setting the mood for the remainder of the play: "... 'tis bitter cold and I am sick at heart." (I,1,8-9) said Francisco as he was relieved from watch-duty. Also, in the film, these words are greatly aided in their purpose by the images of snow-covered Denmark. Another line, in the fourth act: "something is rotten in the state of Denmark" (I.4.67) reaffirms this mood and goes further to place Francisco 's sickness at heart down to a rottenness in Denmark.

Now, how the world is realigned with the Natural Order is the link back to the first part of the concept: Humans are the creatures, knowingly or unknowingly, that fix the problems that throw the world out of Order in the first place. In Hamlet, this is the case. Without Divine Intervention, however, Denmark would have remained in a state of malaise:

The Ghost, you see, gave Hamlet the one piece of information that was needed to manipulate him into action: That his father, King Hamlet, had been murdered. With this knowledge, Hamlet was able to mould his grief into anger - albeit slowly - and fulfill the will of the God by realigning the Natural Order in Denmark.

There are two parallels running: the first from King Fortinbras to Fortinbras and the second from King Hamlet to Hamlet. Both are disrupted, causing not one, but two interlocking lines of Natural Order to be upset. This is, perhaps, the reason Divine Intervention was necessary to fix it; Claudius 's murder of King Hamlet gave him power not only over Denmark, but Poland also.

As can be seen, the major character that the concept of Divine Intervention and Natural Order can be related to is, or course, Hamlet. He is the most interconnected character in the text; the manipulated being used indirectly by God, and also the one to realign the natural order. But why? This quote, from Philip Edwards, explains: "What is unendurable to heaven is not to be endured by men. Evil is not ineradicable, and heaven may appoint an agent of its justice to pluck it out - Hamlet."

Thus, Hamlet is Divine Justice, charged by the Ghost of his Father - a messenger from God - to cleanse Denmark of evil. "Revenge his foul and unnatural murder." (I,5,71) And he goes about it with a passion. From Philip Edward 's essay this quote is taken: "The voice he hears gives him his mission, which he rapidly expands into a cleansing of the world, a setting right of disjointed time. As the scourge and minister of heaven, he willfully seeks his own salvation by flailing others with his tongue for their moral inadequacies and redirecting their lives as he moves forward to a killing which will re-baptise the state of Denmark." To which I add, not just one, but seven killings.

The realignment of the Natural Order is realised in the final scene in the final act, just before Hamlet 's death: "The rest is silence." (V,2) As there is no definite in-text acknowledgement that the Natural Order was upset, conclusions can be drawn from other lines, the descriptor of rottenness in Demark being one of them. And so it is that, although there is no line saying "The world is now in alignment with the Natural Order", we can say "The rest is silence" is the realisation that the world is right again. There is no more chaos, no trouble, just peace - usually equated with silence and calm.

The major impact of the Divine Intervention and Natural Order theory is upon the audience 's perception of the play after its conclusion. The dominant view taken is that Hamlet, although achieving his goal of revenge, caused a chaotic mess of death that was, in itself, meaningless. This view lends itself to a play-given moral of 'revenge is bad ' or some other similarly droll statement of absolutes.

When applying the text to the Natural Order theory, the deaths of the six apparently innocent characters - Gertrude, Polonius, Ophelia, Laertes, Rosencrantz and Gildenstern - can be justified. All were wronged by Claudius 's misdeed, all were in the wrong in some part, and thus, all had been moved out of the Natural Order - even if it was without choice.

Their deaths are integral to the realignment of the Order; if they remain, the corruption lingers also. In death, they are no longer tools of Claudius - who is the cause of the disruption - and do not obstruct Hamlet 's duty as divine justice.

Rather than a purposeless bloodbath, the deaths of the six were actually a necessity to achieving peace and new Order:

Gertrude had married her brother-in-law, and it is quite likely had been seeing him before the death of King Hamlet. Incest, in the time of Hamlet (and, of course, in the current time) was looked upon with great distaste and marrying one 's brother-in-law was seen as incest - unlike now.

Rosencrantz and Gildenstern had been enlisted by Claudius to spy on Hamlet and gauge his madness. Spying is an immoral act, and their doing so, even if enlisted by Claudius, put them in line for a cosmic spanking.

Polonius had spied on Hamlet as well as having plotted with Claudius to partake in many misdeeds. His faults are, perhaps, the most blatant.

Laertes, after the death of his father, consents to follow the whim of Claudius and poison Hamlet. A big mistake, for he ends up taking the life of another human - a cardinal sin.

Lastly, Ophelia; although there is no hard evidence in the play, she may have slept with Hamlet. If this is the case, and sex before marriage is her "wrong", then Shakespeare 's search for evil - and successive eradication of it - was very thorough.

As well as altering the perception of the audience, the play itself can be viewed in a new light: Shakespeare 's Hamlet had yet another underlying meaning. Along with concepts of revenge, ambition, love, marriage, gender, class structure, morality, betrayal and deceit, appearances and reality and madness, the idea that evil does not go unpunished can be expounded to include God as a punisher, hunting down every little transgression and demanding payment in triplicate; payable with ones eternal soul.

Finally, "what about Hamlet 's death?" I hear you ask. Charged with the responsibility of divine justice, it would seem wrong that he should die, right? His death was one big accident, occurring because Laertes was persuaded by Claudius to poison the sword he used to fight Hamlet.

No. Such a simple and... slack answer does not support the theory of Divine Intervention and Natural Order. Hamlet 's death was also necessary to fixing a jaded world.

As can be seen from the flowchart, King Fortinbras ' power passed to King Hamlet with his death - not to Fortinbras as must be assumed it would have. When Claudius gained power, not one, but two Kings had been wronged - their command stolen by evil.

Hamlet dying, after killing Claudius and retrieving the power of the Kings, was the final piece in the puzzle. Control passed to Fortinbras - the only major character not to have committed acts of... poor judgement (to put it lightly), and the Natural Order was truly repaired. Both Denmark and Poland had a ruler of integrity and the eternal loop of badness could be overcome, allowing the world to move into new times of industry and wonder.

Bibliography:

Coyle, M., (ed.) (1992) Hamlet: Contemporary Critical Essays, Macmillan Education Ltd, London.

Muir, K., Wells, S., (ed.) (1980) Aspects of Hamlet, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Shakespeare, W., (ed.) Ridley, M. R., (1964) The Tragedy of Hamlet, Mackays of Chatham.

Stockton, C. L., (2000) CliffsNotes on Shakespeare 's Hamlet, Wiley Publishing Inc., New York.

Bibliography: Coyle, M., (ed.) (1992) Hamlet: Contemporary Critical Essays, Macmillan Education Ltd, London. Muir, K., Wells, S., (ed.) (1980) Aspects of Hamlet, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Shakespeare, W., (ed.) Ridley, M. R., (1964) The Tragedy of Hamlet, Mackays of Chatham. Stockton, C. L., (2000) CliffsNotes on Shakespeare 's Hamlet, Wiley Publishing Inc., New York.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The first theory that is going to be discussed is the alliance aggression theory. The main question that the alliance aggression theory looks to answer is how great of an impact do alliances have on the probability of wars or attacks being carried out. In the alliance aggression theory, the impacts of alliances with potential attackers are investigated as well as the impacts of alliances with potential countries that are at risk of getting attacked. Within the alliance aggression theory, there are three different hypotheses that explain the probability of war or peace with the help of alliances (leeds 428). The first hypothesis states that countries that are contemplating attacking another country are less likely to do so if the attacking country has absolute knowledge that the target country has one or…

    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The recognition that human society is part of the environmental system and that this linkage can cause the effects of human actions to differ from their intent. Decisions are made in order to avoid unintended and unwanted…

    • 2138 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamlet has just fought with Gertrude and Claudius, and has decided to stay home, as opposed to going to college. Claudius told Hamlet he was not allowed to go, and Hamlet decided to stay for his mother. The, “O, that this too too solid flesh would melt…” soliloquy reveals the first thoughts of death that Hamlet has within the play. Not much has happened, but the King and Queen are married, and the ghost has been seen. As the first soliloquy, this is the first insight into Hamlet’s state of mind that the audience has.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hamlet Critical Lens

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Alexander Solzhenitsyn once said “Good literature substitutes for an experience that we ourselves have not lived through.” By this Solzhenitsyn meant that literature often gives us scenarios and conflicts that we might not experience in our lifetime. This is shown through the literary work Hamlet by William Shakespeare. After reading Hamlet I disagree with this quote because authors often exaggerate the truth to make a story more interesting.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Theory and Points

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Describe the theory in your own words. What phenomenon of concern or problems are addressed by the theory (10 points)…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The apparition of the late Hamlet informs his son that Claudius, the current king of Denmark, poisoned him. Upon hearing the news, Hamlet is enraged and swears to take revenge against his usurping uncle. Almost immediately he is ready to lay down his life to correct what has been done, and he now has a “…willingness to throw all he has into the contest, the battle to secure his rightful place in his world” (3). It is at this moment in the play that Hamlet takes on the role of the familiar tragic hero and acts accordingly. He was displaced from the life that he knew and loved and was not awarded with his rightful position in society. Hamlet should be the king of Denmark if what the ghost told him is true; not only is Hamlet not the king of Denmark, but also his mental health is constantly being called into question. He is losing ranks in society awfully quickly, and part of Arthur Miller’s…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau Analysis

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To establish movement between the state of civil society and the state of nature, individuals must form an understanding between each other. This understanding can be based on an array of different arrangements that can be considered a…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prince Hamlet from Hamlet by William Shakespeare and Ruthie from Housekeeping by Marilynne Robinson, both pursue agency which is the ability to act independently on his or her own principles. Their pursuit of agency is affected by many factors which include social position/class, family relationships, and gender. These factors would be analyzed and compared to the ideas and opinions found in the book The Republic by Plato.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The other sows the seed of doubt for this idea, agreeing that this action could help, but natural order must be kept at all costs. These ideas are very close to existentialism and moral relativism (who often go hand-in-hand) in the sense that these men’s morals and virtue differ, presumably due to nature and…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hamlet's Paranoia

    • 2158 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Hamlet, the eponymous hero of Shakespeare’s greatest work, descends swiftly into madness and paranoia after the murder of his father and the realization of his mother’s true, morally reprehensible, nature. As a result of these new responsibilities and extreme circumstances, Hamlet diverges from his usual, logical thinking into paranoia and over analysis, a condition that prevents him from trusting anyone. Hamlet, having been born a prince, is, for the first time, forced to make his own decisions after he learns of the true means of his father’s death. Another contributing factor to his madness is the constant probing of others into Hamlet’s sanity. These factors all contribute to Hamlets delay, and that delay contributes to the tragic downfall of Billy Shakespeare’s most brilliant hero at the hands of a distraught and vengeful Laertes.…

    • 2158 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamlet's Insanity

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Shakespeare's "Hamlet", Hamlet, the main character, displays a very indecisive and uncertain demeanor throughout Hamlet. This recurrent behavior is displayed when: Hamlet first encounters the Ghost of his father, to learn that Hamlet's Uncle, the King, killed Hamlet's Father, also in Shakespeare's most prolific monologue of Hamlet and lastly when Hamlet stabs one of the King's confidants, Polonius. Hamlet's wavering decision making as well as his uncertainty in everything leads to Hamlet's apparent insanity; although he is not completely insane, just to a certain degree that allows him to be somewhat sane.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Sanity of Hamlet

    • 1066 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hamlet’s mind at first glance is not all it appears to be. One would believe Hamlet to be completely insane with everything that had transpired against him. The loss of his father and his mother’s hasty marriage should have driven his mind to utter desolation and insanity, but on the contrary these events only enhanced the fortitude of his mind and intellect. Hamlet’s ability to form coherent thoughts and his clear use of diction express his sanity; the weight of avenging his father’s death and woes over his mother’s betrayal have affected his emotions, but have not corrupted his mind.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamlet's Insanity

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The play entitled The Tragedy of Hamlet by William Shakespeare is all about the life of Prince Hamlet, beginning with his father’s unexpected death and ending with his very own catastrophic death. One of the main themes of the play is Hamlet’s sanity. There is controversy about whether Hamlet eventually becomes insane towards the end of the play or he is simply pretending to be insane the entire time. Prince Hamlet is not crazy; however, the difficulties he is faced with cause him to appear crazy.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamlet Response Paper

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Contrary to popular belief, ignorance is not, in any shape or form, ‘bliss’, however it is not restricting either. No one can truly live in a constant state of ignorance, because just as time heals all wounds, time also inflicts them. Sometimes not knowing is antagonizing than knowing. However, knowledge can place a person in a situation where they feel that they have no other option but to perform an act of some kind. In the Shakespearean play “Hamlet”, the main character’s, Prince Hamlet, revelations of the sins committed by his uncle, Claudius, adds to the tension that already existed between the two and is the catalyst to the tragic events that take place within the play. The grievances that Hamlet had against his Claudius, now his step-father and King, is the murder of his father, the theft of his crown and Claudius’ hasty marriage of his mother and queen, Gertrude.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamlet Analytical Essay

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The play, Hamlet, by William Shakespeare is a tragic story about a prince named Hamlet attempting to get revenge for his father's murder. As Hamlet only to slowly destroy his life in the process. As Hamlet attempts to get revenge, he ultimately ends up destroying himself and the people around him. But before his death, Hamlet slowly decides what he wants to do with his life. Hamlet goes from thinking the world holds nothing for him but not wanting to kill himself because he fears god in the first Soliloquy, to living to avenge his father if needed in the second Soliloquy, to fearing death in the third Soliloquy. Hamlet slowly decides what he wants to do with his life, through his first three Soliloquies in the play…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics