Harry Potter's Definition Of A Soul Essay

The definition of a soul is” the spiritual or immaterial part of a human being or animal regarded as immortal”. Philosophers and theologians have debated the souls purpose for many centuries and some have even believed no one has a soul. Throughout history, societies have viewed what is a soul differently.. The Greeks viewed their souls as life itself. What is not clear is are there souls and if so, how do they really work? Some in our society believe the soul is the essence or spirit of the person which lives on after death.. In all of Harry Potter’s books, their characters’ souls were integral parts in the books and the movies that followed. These souls were key elements of the books which kept the reader involved and anticipating
Philosophers believe in either dualism or materialism. One example is when reviewing and studying Plato’s metaphysics, his would be dualism since he stated the level of being consists of timeless essences or entities called Forms or “souls”. These were also sometimes called transcendental because it asserted a plane of existence, “above and beyond” our own ordinary existence and the definition of transcend is “anything is to far beyond it as if to reach a qualitatively different level. Platonic forms independent and existing, non-spatial, non-temporal “somethings (“kinds,” types” or ‘sorts’) that cannot be known through the senses but known in thought, these forms are not ideas in our usual sense since knowledge is always about forms. When looking at the word form it reminds you of shapes of things, a manner or style of something. We make forms everyday, molds such as dishes we eat off of, or statues we look to as art in today’s world, or even toys for children to play with. We all fill in forms such for business. Filling out these forms notion and implies something in general or essential order, structure, and or shape for a particular instance. Thus, exactly what Plato meant by forms has remained a subject of intense philosophical debate and argument from his days till the present
According to Plato forms or “souls” with the big F are truly real objects of someone’s sense perception are mere reflections, or diluted copies of forms. Aristotle had worried that dualism leads to otherworldliness, to a suppose chasm between the actual and the ideal. That a discussion of what is can never amount to more than a likely story; and knowledge of what ought to be has little or no relevance to pressing moral, political or social problems. If Aristotle was correct in claiming there is only one world, then whatever form is can only be an aspect of that world. Aristotle also had an argument that form could only be distinguished from content only in thought and never in fact. An example of this was we could mentally distinct between shapes and colors, but we would never encounter shapeless colors or colorless shapes. So, mentally we cannot distinguish between mortality and living things, but we will never encounter mortality of and by itself, any more than we would encounter living things without also encountering mortality. In the end, this means mortality is formal and/or an essential aspect to all living