Throughout her article Helene Cixious provides an analysis of the structure of writing. In doing so she devises a binary opposition between masculine and feminine writing. Her first objective is to prove that, currently, writing is sexual and not neutral. She achieves this by connecting the history of writing to the phallocentric tradition. Cixious writes, "Nearly the entire history of writing is confounded with the history of reason"¦ the phallocentric tradition" (pp.576). Sexuality is defined through the mere presence of the penis, yet female sexuality is left
Throughout her article Helene Cixious provides an analysis of the structure of writing. In doing so she devises a binary opposition between masculine and feminine writing. Her first objective is to prove that, currently, writing is sexual and not neutral. She achieves this by connecting the history of writing to the phallocentric tradition. Cixious writes, "Nearly the entire history of writing is confounded with the history of reason"¦ the phallocentric tradition" (pp.576). Sexuality is defined through the mere presence of the penis, yet female sexuality is left