Preview

Henry VI and the Nobility

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1329 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Henry VI and the Nobility
The power of the Nobility was the most important cause of unrest in the period of 1450 to 1470. ‘How far do you agree?’
During 1450- 1470, there were two main kingships; Henry VI and Edward IV. The first kingship was an extremely weak one with Henry VI who seemed to show a clear lack of interest in ruling the country, and then came Edward IV who was a strong king that sorted out the mess that Henry VI had left behind.
However, throughout both reigns, the nobility seemed to stay the same; the majority of them were over mighty and caused unrest. My essay is going to discuss the impact of these over mighty nobles and the impact of king Henry VI and Edward IV.
Firstly, Henry VI’s noble, Somerset contributed greatly to unrest during this period; Somerset was sent by the king to protect France. Despite the Duke of York appearing to be a much better alternative to
Somerset, the king still chose him. Somerset made a mess of things in France and proceeded to loose most of the territories; this contributed to England loosing power and caused a lot of unrest in the government and also in the public. Unrest was evoked and the Duke of York’s anger at Somerset encouraged him to march on Black Heath demanding he be imprisoned. It also caused unrest with the entire country who were angry that Somerset had thrown away land which was hard won by Henry V. On the other hand, some people may review this situation as not the fault of Somerset, but the fault of an under-mighty king Henry who did not make the right decision between York and Somerset. The king is also supposed to over view all the nobles and make sure they were doing their duty correctly; Henry should have intervened before the loss of territory and stopped it from happening. After all, he is the one in control of the country. Henry’s mental illness could of been the cause for his bad decision making and a contribution to the reasons why he was a weak ruler.
Another noble to cause unrest in the country

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    After Edward IV died in 1483, a dispute began between to major factions – the Woodvilles and Richard of Gloucester. The Woodvilles were the family of Elizabeth Woodville, Edward’s wife, with whom he shared many children. Edward V, the heir to the throne, was the son of Elizabeth Woodville, and so this put them in a good position. However, Richard of Gloucester was Edward’s brother and had shown himself to be a very useful and successful man to Edward during his reign. They both had their various strengths and weaknesses, and they both wanted the same thing. Control of England.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    HOW FAR WAS HENRY VII’S CONTROL OF THE NOBILITY 1485 TO 1509 DUE TO HIS FINANCIAL POLICIES? (24 marks)…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ap Euro Review Packet

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. Political- One of the causes was Charles’s I unsuccessful attempt to arrest five members of Parliament, known as the Grand Remonstrance, on January 4, 1642. Another cause was who should have the power in the country and inflation forced up prices in all parts of Europe. An effect would be that England became a Commonwealth and a Protectorate. Parliamentary supremacy was another effect.…

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    AP EURO SEMESTER FINAL REVIEW

    • 13928 Words
    • 37 Pages

    5) Henry VII of England: King of England from August 22, 1485 to April 21, 1509. After the War of Roses, restored political stability in England…

    • 13928 Words
    • 37 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kings and Queens Paper

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Henry IV a Huguenot prince inherited the French throne in 1589. For four years, right after he took up the throne he fiercely fought for control of France against catholic oppression, and to end the fighting finally he changed to Catholicism. Even though he was now officially a catholic, he issued the Edict of Nantes in 1598 that provided Huguenots religious freedom. After all, of that Henry IV set out to fix all the damage he had done. He said his goal was not the victory of one sec over another but “a chicken in every pot”-a good sun-day dinner for every peasant. While Henry ruled, the Government was everywhere officials administered justice, improved roads, built bridges, and revived agriculture. Henry IV was assassinated in 1610 twenty-one years after he inherited the throne which was passed down to his nine year old son Louis XIII.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry’s first real aspirations of reclaiming the throne of England ostensibly came about in 1483 following the quashed Buckingham rebellion. This uprising showed Henry the lack of support for Richard and between 1483 and 1485, Henry sent emissaries to build support for himself in England, before being forced to flee from…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1470 Edward IV’s rule was challenged by the former monarch that he had usurped, Henry VI, and one of the key reasons as to why he was able to overcome this challenge was due to his popularity as king. Edward had proved to be an able king who was also young, strong and handsome, which is severely juxtaposed to the monarch he had usurped, as Henry VI was old, a less than capable ruler and thought to be insane. This meant that not only his original usurpation of Henry in 1461 was considered more acceptable to England’s population as it was most likely going to better the country; it also meant that Henry’s usurpation of Edward in 1470 was especially unfavourable with the population. Another reason why Edward was able to overcome his challenge of usurpation was at that time France was very unpopular with England, which is unsurprising as it is said that ‘England’s national hobby was going to war with France’, and Henry VI’s wife, Margaret of Anjou was the French kings niece. This marriage alone would be enough to make Edward appear more favourable with the general population; however it seemed likely that if Edward had not usurped, an alliance between the two countries would proceed, which only served to support Edward’s campaign to get back on the throne. Nonetheless, the most damaging factor to the position of the opposition is most likely the circumstances that the Lancastrian house found themselves in as with the deaths of both their key supporter, the Earl of Warwick, at the Battle of Barnet and of the Lancastrian heir, Edward, Prince of Wales at Tewkesbury, the Lancastrian position was no longer considered viable. The popularity of Edward IV was not repeated with Richard III however, and this combined with the fact he usurped a king that was showing great…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Edward IV restored some elements of royal authority in the years 1471 – 1483, he had destroyed his opposition or forced them into exile, he used family member to control more volatile regions and took a keen interest in law and order. In addition he improved the English economy and made a somewhat successful invasion of France. Although some would argue that Edward failed at restoring Royal authority because his heirs were only young at his time of death, Nobel rivalry thought England and his foreign policy had begun to go wrong.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is clear that many of the origins of this 'crisis' have their roots in the reign of Henry VIII. He left a very difficult legacy to his successors, but it must be remembered that Somerset provoked the problems already in existence and Northumberland and Mary I then had the difficult task of resolving them. Henry VIII was only one contributing factor to the crisis.…

    • 1997 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trade Vs Manorialism

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Each of the english monarchs had grown more and more power. William tightened the iron fist by creating feudalism 2.0, the domesday book, and built plenty of castles. Henry I followed suit, establishing the exchequer and creating traveling judges to try courts, then Henry II, started a 12 man jury and allowed nobles to buy their way out of becoming a knight. So when Henry II died and left his son, John, to the throne, it seemed natural that the king's power would continue to grow...well not exactly this time (sorry King John). Nobody really liked King John. He was always trying to increase taxes, including illegal church taxes and noble's taxes, and inevitably lost most of England's french land ( AU REVOIR JOHNNY). Usually, the…

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the rule of Henry VI, certain nobles had increasing amounts of power, which angered some of the other nobles who felt they were being ignored. It is certain that they had too much power at the time, and that this was a contributing cause for the outbreak of the conflicts, however it was catalysed by things like bastard feudalism These sources show various views linked to the statement that “the problem of an over-mighty nobility was the main cause of the outbreak of the wars of the roses”. In this essay, I will put the sources in context using my own knowledge and see how far they support or disagree the statement, and to what extent it is true.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Once thought that Henry governed very diff to his predecessors, he was a ‘new monarch’ responsible for est a nation or sovereign state – no longer accepted…

    • 1900 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the late fourteenth to mid-sixteenth century, Great Britain underwent massive changes throughout the entire realm. From the new system of deposing kings to religious upheavals, England during this time had a hard time finding peace. During those two hundred years, personal ambition of kings and nobles was the most disruptive to English society, which was exacerbated by the religious break instituted by Henry VIII in 1534.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Social problems, such as a rapid increase in unemployment, became an issue for the governments of Somerset and Northumberland. When Somerset was in government unemployment rates were high because of a growing population, particularly in the urban parts of the country i.e. East Anglia. This meant that jobs were in demand and with a large population out of work standards of living dropped as people couldn’t afford the most basic things. In order to solve this problem Somerset came up with the ’Vagrancy Act’ which many historians regarded as an malicious attack on vagrants and showed no compassion from Somerset. The failure of this policy was evident in the small number of local authorities who actually enforced it. The masses were also displeased and with rumours of riots Somerset hadn’t managed to solve the situation but created conflict that might’ve contributed to the riots of 1549 and his downfall as well.…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Europeans wanted to settle this land and claim it for England. How were they to do this if there were people already living here? The king gave these immigrants permission to acquire this land even if it meant by force. Some of these immigrants had compassion and understanding for the natives that lived there and tried to trade with them for land possession but most of the time these inhabitants were just regarded by these…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays