Preview

Historical Accuracies And Inaccuracies At The Watergate Hotel

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
849 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Historical Accuracies And Inaccuracies At The Watergate Hotel
After a break in at the Watergate Hotel, two journalist names Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward were assigned to take the story and find out what really happened. Throughout this paper I will give a summary, talk about historical accuracies and inaccuracies, and also include the social/political impact form the film. In the film the White House aide told Bob that Howard Hunt was investigating Senator Kennedy. Carl Bernstein had a conversation with the white house librarian about books that Howard Hunt took out on Senator Kennedy. Shortly after that, she denied knowing a Howard Hunt. Both Washington post journalist went the white house to look at the white house request card-files on Howard Hunt. After going through all of the cards and not finding …show more content…

After Bernstein appointment being canceled and being ignored all day; he made his own way to see Mr. Dardis by tricking the woman at the front desk. After going through the checks, Bernstein found a check from the Midwest finance chairman for twenty-five thousand dollars that was given to the burglars. The person who signed off the check was Kenneth Dahlberg. Woodward called Mr. Dahlberg he was displeased with the conversation, but he stated that he gave the check to Maurice Stans. The reporter shortly found out that the people who were donating the checks, did not know what the CREEP was doing with the money. Both Woodward and Bernstein found there were illegal slush funds with hundreds of thousands of dollars of unaccountable cash. After Carl had visited Hugh Sloan bookkeeper, she stated that in a two-day period the CREEP received six million dollars in cash. The journalist met with Hugh Sloan and he told them that the white house signs off on all CREEP activities. The journalist then looked into Segretti he stated the he was offered the job and he was being paid to travel the country to sabotage democratic campaigns. Bernstein connected Haldeman, Nixon aid to the slush

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    All The President's Men

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Woodward and Bernstein served as watchdogs of government officials. What are some of the challenges they confronted as reporters unraveling the Watergate story?…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He, along with the rest of the hired intruders, was caught in the act by security guards. Their mission was to install eavesdropping equipment in the chambers and to retrieve secret democratic files, so the president would know the Democrats’ secret plans. It was later confirmed that Nixon, along with most of his administration, was involved in the scandal. Nixon and his administration violated the constitution in two different ways. They violated the constitution by committing perjury and by obstructing justice. Nixon and his administration committed perjury b denying their involvement with the scandal. They obstructed justice by bribing individuals to remain silent towards the Scandal and by editing and erasing information off of the audio tapes. These audio tapes were key evidence that would have allowed the case to have been solved…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Among the five men arrested was E. Howard Hunt, Jr., a former Nixon aide, and G. Gordon Liddy, a lawyer for the Committee to Re-elect the President. Shortly afterward, the presiding judge received a letter from one of the convicted men. It spoke of payoffs to the burglars in return for their silence.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a recurring theme of “dirty politics” and the extremes that politicians will go through in order to secure a seat in office. Woodward and Bernstein's notes from source interviews, drafts of newspaper stories and books, memos, letters, tape recordings, research materials, and other Watergate papers was evidence used to support the authors argument throughout the book. All the President's Men was a very hard book to read. It really seemed like the story wasn't going anywhere until the last few chapters. It actually seemed like the same exact things were happening over and over, but with different people being interviewed. It did provide a few pictures of some of the men involved and a few footnotes to better explain a few things. These did help, but it wasn't enough for me to really enjoy the story or remember each person. I think that the story needs to be told, but in a few less words. It was a very important case for the United States, but not many people would like to or would need to know so many details about every single conversation and discovery involved. These things are great for historians, but not in a story. Overall, the book was written well and very informational, but I would not recommend it to be read for…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the Watergate affaire Woodward is told to research on the thieves and see if there is more to it then just a simple robbery. Already at the court he finds out that all the thieves are connected with the CIA and other agencies. Trying to gain more information Woodward finds a lawyer named Marken who has been assigned…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Us. V. Nixon Court Case

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The start of the 1970s was a period of inclining distrust in the National Government. The Pentagon Papers revealed the government’s purposeful deception of the actions undergoing in Vietnam and the American people realized that they’d been deceived. Americans were in shock when the National Guard engaged in opened fire at the scene of a Kent State University protest resulting from President Nixon's authorization for the United States to attack Cambodia. A total of four students were killed in the process. Nixon then attempted to cover up illegal actions by himself and his administration which further angered the American people. In June 1972, five men sporting cameras and bugging equipment were charged with arrest within the Democratic National Committee's offices in the Watergate complex in Washington, D.C. Soon after the authorities discovered that the burglars were employed, directly or indirectly, for the Committee to Re-Elect the President. President Nixon and heads of his campaign denied any and all connections with the incident. The five men were then convicted of burglary, including E. Howard Hunt, Jr., a former Nixon aide, and G. Gordon Liddy, a lawyer purposed for the Committee to Re-elect the President. Shortly after the incident, the presiding judge received a letter written by…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard Nicon 's administration attempted to cover up the involvement of this. What was the Watergate scandal? Richard Nixon ordered men to break in to the Democratic National Committee HQ to find out how he could win the next election. These men got caught and Richard Nicon had lied. But, there were tapes of him saying damaging things. There was an FBI leak that made sure he got in trouble. Richard Nixon left before impeachement. What were people 's reactions to the Watergate scandal? At the beginning of the scandal, the American public found it hard to fathom the scandal. The Watergate details seemed too outlandish to fathom and therefore outside the range of most people 's immediate concern. But, when important White House officials began to resign, the public began to associate the White House and the President with scandal. The public then became outraged. The major people involved in Watergate were: Howard Baker, Robert Bark, Charles W. Colson, Bernard Barker, Richard Nixon of course and many other. The Watergate Scandal proved that the Constitution 's system of checks and balances could function to force an abusive or tyrannical president out of power. Richard Nixon left before…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On May 28, 1972, a group of men working at the White House, including G. Gordon Liddy and E. Howard Hunt, who both were part of the Committee for the Re-Election of the president (CRP), met at the Watergate hotel in Washington, D.C., with the plan to bug the phones of several DNC officials (Balis & Levy…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On June 17 1972 a security guard named Frank Wills had alerted authorities that there was a break-in at the Democratic National Committee headquarters at the Watergate. The Watergate is a complex which has offices, hotel, and apartments. Five men were arrested for breaking into the Watergate complex. They were found with cash, and electronic surveillance equipment. The men were caught while attempting to wiretap phones and steal secret information. It is unknown if Nixon was aware of the heist, however it is known of his attempts to cover it up.…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Watergate was during the 1970’s when five men broke into the headquarters of the Democratic Party to mess with what was going on during the election. By the five men messing with the information, these events lead to Richard Nixon becoming the President of the United States and for there to be a massive crisis in the 1970’s.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On 6/18/72 a man who was an employee of Richard Nixon’s reelection committee office was arrested after trying to bug democratic national committee office. This was one of the series of events that lead to the 8-0 vote from congress to have the tapes from the Watergate scandal released. After this, impeachment inevitable.…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The technical investigative process that the characters go through as they get closer and closer to their story gives the viewer the idea that a person cannot give up until they have reached a desired goal (Ebert). The two reporters investigated continuously around the clock, searching for one detail after another of information to support their story. There is one scene when Woodward is at his desk continuing to investigate his story even while the rest of the office is watching Nixon during his campaign. Even though both Woodward and Bernstein had the door literally slammed in their faces multiple times looking for enlightenment on the subject matter, they did not stop until one person was willing to answer their questions. Their persistence eventually lead to Nixon’s resignation.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As I read through “Breaking into Watergate” I found it a very interesting read. Based on the knowledge I knew about the Watergate scandal and what I have read in the opening section of the chapter, I did not know a lot. The author presented a great summary on what actually happened during court trails as well as confessions and how the court figured out that Nixon was a part of the whole thing. The author’s main focus on this chapter was about evidence and tape recordings. Tape recordings made it possible to figure out the verdict of the Watergate Scandal. The writer of this document made it clear that there were many points about this subject. One of the points being, without tape recording evidence, it would have not been possible to catch the criminal behind the scenes. Another main point that the author makes is that, even though the evidence is there for the Nixon case, there are still things being left out. At the end of the reading the author mentions questions like, “If the tapes confirm what we already know, why get so excited?” as well as “What is left for the tapes to tell?” With those questions in mind that brings up another valid point, should the tapes be valid enough to prove that Nixon is guilty? These main points that author makes play a big part in the Watergate scandal and the main points being: how additional evidence is necessary, what is being left out with the evidence provided, and is it enough evidence to convict Nixon.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The investigations into the scandal revealed unsettling information that important members of Nixon’s administration were involved, hinting at the potential that the Presidency itself might be corrupt. This suspicion was only strengthened when the Committee to Reelect the President (CREEP) was found to have orchestrated the break in. As President at the time, Nixon had even more suspicion directed towards him as he had been reelected just before this scandal took place. This has been attributed to CREEP members having engaged in illegal activities, some of which resembled Watergate. 8, 9,…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tweed Ring

    • 377 Words
    • 1 Page

    As they say, the truth always comes out. Tweed was finally accused of defrauding the city. The charges were divided between Tweed, his subordinates and the contractors.…

    • 377 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays