For example, the Quran, where the ark appears as Safina Nūḥ (a), which is another name for Noah, warns his people that their belief in the statutes are simply fictitious. Trying to convince them that they will experience God’s anger if they don't adhere to his teachings. (As - Saffat; 37:121) But despite having to hear of these narratives of followers, how much of the truth is there beneath it all? Were these accounts in chronological order? What logic was used if Noah accounted even animals that don’t even inhabit near him geographically? The accounts of Noah's Ark were merely an instructive parable because many depictions are flawed, the verification for a global flood remains absent, and nothing to substantiate the ark has been
For example, the Quran, where the ark appears as Safina Nūḥ (a), which is another name for Noah, warns his people that their belief in the statutes are simply fictitious. Trying to convince them that they will experience God’s anger if they don't adhere to his teachings. (As - Saffat; 37:121) But despite having to hear of these narratives of followers, how much of the truth is there beneath it all? Were these accounts in chronological order? What logic was used if Noah accounted even animals that don’t even inhabit near him geographically? The accounts of Noah's Ark were merely an instructive parable because many depictions are flawed, the verification for a global flood remains absent, and nothing to substantiate the ark has been