Historical And Theoretical Roots Of Social Constructionist Theory
Based on article Social Construction of Crime, the social construction is define as a theoretical position that cuts across a number of disciplinary and interdisciplinary fields, including sociology, psychology, psychotherapy, women's studies, queer studies, the history and philosophy of science, narrative philosophy, and literary theory, among others . Besides, this article also said that every single thing that human do in their live such as sleep is counted as social facts. From this article, the social constructionist perspective defined crime as crime is a classification of behavior defined by individuals with the power and authority to make laws that identify some behavior as offensive and render its perpetrators subject to punishment.
…show more content…
Firstly, Husserl's transcendental phenomenology which said that the phenomenological inquiry how our acting towards object as real. Next, Schutz's sociological phenomenology integrated Husserl’s phenomena with Max Weber by using the concept of interpretive understanding and ideal-type construction, which are generalized types of behavior. Then, Berger and Luckmann's social construction of reality discussed the reification involved three interrelated processes which is externalization, objectification, and internalization. Externalization have occurs through communication that create the categories among people and classify the events that they experience. Objectification is the process that existence of these object. Internalization has happened when knowledge about social institutions and structures is communicated back to members of society. Garfinkel's ethnomethodology is focused on how social order, social institutions, and social structure emerged from shared mundane interactions among ordinary people in their everyday lives. The social interactionism of Mead and Blumer discussed the way of interpretations that has been practices through their daily lives. Labeling perspective in the sociology of deviance concepts of the social process of meaning construction through interaction and the routine ways these were
Firstly, Husserl's transcendental phenomenology which said that the phenomenological inquiry how our acting towards object as real. Next, Schutz's sociological phenomenology integrated Husserl’s phenomena with Max Weber by using the concept of interpretive understanding and ideal-type construction, which are generalized types of behavior. Then, Berger and Luckmann's social construction of reality discussed the reification involved three interrelated processes which is externalization, objectification, and internalization. Externalization have occurs through communication that create the categories among people and classify the events that they experience. Objectification is the process that existence of these object. Internalization has happened when knowledge about social institutions and structures is communicated back to members of society. Garfinkel's ethnomethodology is focused on how social order, social institutions, and social structure emerged from shared mundane interactions among ordinary people in their everyday lives. The social interactionism of Mead and Blumer discussed the way of interpretations that has been practices through their daily lives. Labeling perspective in the sociology of deviance concepts of the social process of meaning construction through interaction and the routine ways these were