Preview

Historical Background And Causes Of The Turkish-Kurdish Conflict

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
992 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Historical Background And Causes Of The Turkish-Kurdish Conflict
Historical Background & Causes:
The Turkish-Kurdish conflict began because of the refusal of the Turkish government to recognize the national identity of the Kurds. The Turkish government tried to get rid of the Kurdish identity and assimilate the Kurds into Turkish society. There was also an attempt to get rid of the Kurdish language, which later was called a “linguistic genocide”. Despite the fact that the Kurdish language was banned only in 1983, already in 1925 in some provinces it was forbidden to speak Kurdish. The government of Turkey sought to ensure that the Kurdish population as soon as possible went to the Turkish language. But as the time showed, the process proved unsuccessful. Mustafa Kemal Ataturk during the War of Independence
…show more content…
The government sought to exert pressure on the PKK in various ways. They used various methods to deal with the PKK, such as: detecting and arresting leaders, spoiling, intimidation, finding and confiscating weapons and explosives, dispersing violent riots and setting up security measures on main routes. However, when the conflict was transferred to the territory of Northern Iraq, Turkey had to change its methods. Because, there were external factors. In 1920 the United Kingdom gave autonomy to the Kurds in northern Iraq, and this fact posed a threat to the territorial integrity of Turkey. The government understood this as a threat to the assimilation of Kurds in Turkey. However, Turkey could not resist it because of two factors: Turkey was preoccupied with suppressing its own Kurdish insurgencies and also they were in the process of joining the League of Nations and wanted to receive financial aid. In 2003, when the US invaded Iraq, Turkey also remained aloof. Because they did not want to jeopardize their entry into NATO. Turkey hunted for the leader of the PKK, Abdullah Ocalan, for a very long time and eventually the Turkish MIT (Turkish National Intelligence Organization) kidnapped him in Kenya. In Turkey, he was sentenced to death, but under the pressure of the world community, they changed the sentence for life imprisonment. Dominance on …show more content…
Even if the PKK loses in this war, until the problem with the recognition of the Kurdish identity in Turkey is not solved, the conflict will continue. Therefore, if possible, it is necessary to resolve this conflict peacefully, because the people living in the zone of combat operations are already tired and exhausted. In recent years, little progress has been made through the efforts of Erdogan and Ocalan. Ocalan calls on the Turkish government to carry out reforms that will guarantee the rights of Kurds and their identity and the PKK will in turn leave the borders of Turkey. Good relations between Turkey and Iraqi Kurdistan can help in solving this problem. But how the neighboring Kurdish autonomy will affect the conflict is unclear. . Political decision-makers in Ankara feel the need for a military victory in the fight against the PKK. But the problem here is not how to win a military victory, but how to pass through the long-term political and socio-economic costs of such a "victory." The key problem in discontinuous wars in recent years is that decision-makers who are overly focused on military triumph in the short term may miss political success and peace in the long term. One can only hope that Ankara realizes this

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    A major result of Saddam Hussein's defeat in the Gulf War (1991) and Operation Provide Comfort was the ultimate establishment of Kurdish control over their traditional homeland in northern Iraq, known as Iraqi Kurdistan and "South Kurdistan". Just a few months after the creation of the autonomous zone, free elections (a first in Iraq) were held in 1992. The two main Kurdish parties, namely Barzani's KDP and the Jalal Talabani-led Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK), split the vote, and subsequently split the government ministries evenly. In May 1994, however, fighting broke out between the Peshmerga of the PUK and of KDP. In the summer of 1996 Barzani called on the assistance of Saddam Hussein's regime to help him combat the PUK, which was receiving…

    • 241 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Final Exam Study Guide

    • 4257 Words
    • 18 Pages

    After the End of World War I, the former Ottoman Empire was occupied by Allied forces who occupied the entire area of modern day Turkey. The former Sultan of Ottoman Empire Mehmet VI Vahideddin had lost almost all of his power. Vahideddin dismisses parliament in 1918. The Treaty of Serves was signed in 1920 which allowed for a separate Kurdish and Armenian state to be established (but not guaranteed) as well as an Allied occupation of the Turkish straits (known as the Dardanelles) and the land surrounding it, and finally the Greeks were given the right to administer Izmer and control of Thrace. Hoping to be able to obtain a small portion of land for his "new empire" the Sultan signed the Treaty. The Sultan's new government was officially set up in Istanbul. This collaboration with the West angered a large number of the Sultan's "subjects." Due to this anger towards the Allied occupation and the Sultan, a number of resistance groups were established and attacked the Allied occupiers all around modern day Turkey. The resistance groups collectively called themselves the "Defense of Rights." When the Greeks arrived in Izmer, they immediately began to push past their designated territory and began a brutal campaign pushing into the Anatolia. This campaign, which harmed lots of civilians, had the Defense of Rights group start fighting the Greek forces. While this was going on, an officer in the former Ottoman Army named Mustafa Kemal(ethno-nationalist), gathered a number of members of the Defense of Rights movement(which he led) and former CUP officials to Ankara to form the Grand National Assembly in 1920.…

    • 4257 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For Atatürk to successfully advocate an independent national identity, he would have to sever links with other Middle Eastern cultures, through language, cultural reform and politics. Ottoman Turkish, which is considered vastly different to modern “Istanbul Turkish”, used many loanwords from Arabic and Persian, and in the empire, Arabic was considered their scientific and legal language, and Persian their literary language. The Turkish spoken by uneducated Turks was referred to as “rough Turkish”, but would eventually become reinstated as the national language of Turkey by Atatürk. In doing so, Atatürk was able to work towards severing connections with the rest of the Muslim world, which he saw as stagnating, and move towards Europe, a symbol of progress . Atatürk spread nationalist ideology throughout Turkey through many mediums, including teaching it to children. As of 1924, the Atatürk regime began publishing new history textbooks, which, unlike its predecessors, focused almost solely on Ottoman heritage, rather than Islam and the Middle East, and portrayed the Islamification of Turkey as its downfall, emphasizing the importance of the 19th century nationalism movement. In 1929, textbooks focusing on the spread of the Turkic people around the globe were released, stating that “Turks brought civilization to the world”, rather than focusing on Arab and Persian civilization, contrasting Ottoman era textbooks. Despite the progress made through nationalism, atrocities were also committed in Turkey due to the spread of this new ideal, such as the Armenian, Greek and Jewish genocide. After the Greco-Turkish wars, Greeks, and in extension, Christians were viewed as a threat to the Turkish republic, and due to this, were either deported or massacred. Aggressive Kemalist nationalism has still left its mark on Turkey today, due to the discrimination non-Turkish Muslims face, who, prior to this new…

    • 1722 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. The thesis of the article is that Sudan has been politically unstable over the period of its two long civil wars. The south did not identify with the Arab led Sudanese society and created a referendum on southern independence. The two halves of the nation fight in an imminent war killing millions while trying to resolve the issues.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are three ethnicity-based governments in Iraq that absolutely hate each other and do not get along at all. Many factors play into the instabilities of the governments ran by the Sunnis, Shiites, and Kurds. The roles of the Sunnis, Shiites, and Kurds greatly impact the modern and future issues of Iraq. The only problem existing between them is that they do not have the ability to interact with each other. The opposing views of the Sunni, Shiite, and Kurdish governments in Iraq make it difficult for them to unite and agree upon political issues, potentially leading to long-term political instability.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Iraq sunni shiite kurds

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The name Shiites actually means "party of Ali" since they were his followers when deciding who should succeed Muhammad.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It wasn’t until the nineteenth century that the conditions between the Armenians and Muslims population worsen that made the Ottoman officials in a bind. The Muslims were resentful that the Armenian community was flourishing in culture and economics whiled the Ottoman Empire was experiencing trouble. Armenian leaders wanted more fairer treatments and autonomy within the empire caused the tensions between Muslim and Armenians to rise even further.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should the massacre of over a million Armenians by the Ottoman Turks be considered Genocide?…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Allied powers were to a great extent responsible for the Ottoman Empire becoming the Turkish state in 1923 by sparking the conflict in Turkey. This is seen through the wartime agreements of the allies and their involvement in the War of Independence in Turkey. However, the nationalists within Turkey who were led by Mustafa Kemal and the involvement of Greek forces played a much greater role in the ongoing struggle to abolish the Ottoman Empire during the War of Independence.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Iraq Genocide

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dehumanization the Kurds were forced to leave their homes in northern Iraq and move to less fertile areas in the south.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Armenian Genocide was one of the most violent historical moments that deprived homelands from 1.5 million Armenians through forced deportations and massacres during 1915 and 1923. As the turmoil between the allies and central powers escalated into WWI, under the guise of military tactics the Turkish government deported and exterminated the Armenian population. ” By the early 1920s, when the massacres and deportations finally ended, between 600,000 and 1.5 million Armenians were dead, with many more forcibly removed from the country.” (Gale). The Armenians were subjected to deportation, abduction, torture and systematic murder.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Armenian Genocide Analysis

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The act alone of exterminating the Armenians was an attempt at keeping the Turkish country pure. The Turkish wanted Islam to be the only religion and not Christianity, as Armenians practiced. The need and desire to create uniformity and social equilibrium is referred to as the functionalist perspective (Collins 1994). The Armenians did not want to stray away from their own values and culture that the Turks realized that they were going to be a problem with the uniformity they were trying to create. In order to abolish them they used genocide as a way to keep them from rebelling and keep power from the Young Turk. This conflict theory perspective, demonstrates how the Armenians had to fit into the standards even if that meant leaving their traditions and religious beliefs aside (Collins 1994). They did not have the opportunity to flee or try to reform themselves in order to try and save themselves. They were also grouped in parts of eastern Turkey making it simpler for the Turkish to execute their plan (Dadrian 2003). Furthermore, the actually mass killing of the Armenian population was a way of the Turkish to have an ultranationalist state in which their beliefs and core values were the ones that must be followed by anyone under their ruling (Dadrian 2003). This serves as an example of the symbolic interaction perspective, in which, humans function best in a practical and interactive way in accordance to their surroundings (Collins 1994). This demonstrates how the Young Turks were determined to create an improved environment and would justify their killings on these ideological concepts. They used violence and terror as a way to simplify the transition of power that they were trying to…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kurdish Genocide

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages

    and the Kurdistan Democratic Party – Iraq (KDP) negotiated an agreement which allowed the Kurds a…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Armenian Genocide

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Again, many will ask, why? Why would the Muslims think that the solution to their problems with the Christians would be the extermination of them? Why did the Turkish people kill people by the hundreds and still feel no remorse if they believe in sinning? Whether it be due to fear or hatred, the acts of violence committed by the Muslim people of the empire changed the lives of many and most times cannot be justified or explained. The Armenian Genocide is proof that religious violence has occurred over the last one hundred years, despite the advances made in the world. People in today’s society should look to the Armenian Genocide to see the atrocities and learn from them, so that as the world develops we can act more justly and treat people equally, regardless of their religious…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To understand and make clear the duties, structure, and history of National Security Council, we should first analyze the term national security.We should see national security as polirical and judicial term. It is political, because it changes according to the political circumstances in different states. For exaple, Turkey 's understanding of national security is different than of Israel 's. Each changes according to the economic situations, relationship with it 's neighbours and jeopolitical situation. Moreover, it can be count as juridical because it exists in constitution and in other laws. National Security Council ( NSC ) is an institution, which is established as an advisory body, which gives advices to the Council of Ministers. NSC established in 1961 with the 1961 constitution and modified two times. In terms of article 118 of 1961 constitution, NSC is composed of Prime Minister, The Cief of The General Staff, the ministers of national defence, internal, and foreign affairs, The Commander of tha Army, and Navy and the Airforce, General Commander of the gendarmerie, under the chairmanship of the president. ' ' (As amended on 3.10.2001-4709/32) The National Security Council shall be composed of the Prime Minister, the Chief of the General Staff, Deputy Prime Ministers, Ministers of Justice, National Defence, Internal Affairs and Foreign Affairs, the Commanders of the Army, Navy and Air Forces and the General Commander of the Gendarmerie, under the chairmanship of the President of the Republic. ' 'Depending on the agenda, related Ministers and persons may be invited to the meetings of the Council for their views. ' ' (As amended on 3.10.2001-4709/32) The National Security Council shall submit its advisory decisions about the formulation, determination and implementation of the national security policy of the State and its…

    • 2349 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays