Preview

History of Regret

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2554 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
History of Regret
Student Name
Professor’s Name
Unit Code
Date
History of Regrets After reading Houston’s memoir Farewell to Manzanar, it brings out the treatment of the government of the United States to the Japanese living in the country at the time of world war two were discriminative. In the Executive Order 9066, it is evident that the policies the government was trying to enforce were solely aimed at oppressing the Japanese. The order opened up a gap that would allow the military commanders to make the decisions on who should be evacuated from the military area. This freedom led to the Japanese being evacuated to concentration camps since they were viewed as threats to the United States. Fred Korematsu was charged with defying military orders to evacuate and detained. According to him, he had not committed any crime to warrant him to be charged. More to that, Korematsu was born in the United States and is thus a citizen of the United States. By arresting him, the government had violated his rights as a citizen of the United States. When he tried to defend himself at the Supreme Court, the judgment passed overlooked the provisions in the law for him as a citizen. This is because it had violated the fourth, fifth and fourteenth amendments. The fourth amends requires that everyone be accorded the right to be secure with everything that belongs to them. It is provided that they shall not be subjected to unreasonable investigation, detention and also any violations of whatsoever nature unless with conclusive evidence. The Fifth Amendment provides for a person’s freedom in the United States to be respected and if it is to be withdrawn then there has to be a legal process to do as such. The fourteenth amendment states that any an individual who is a United States citizen either through birth or by naturalization remains to be a citizen. The government thus is not in a capacity to authorize any laws that will deprive any citizens of their rights or invulnerability as citizens of



Bibliography: Guttentag, Lucas. "Discrimination, Preemption, and Arizona’s Immigration Law - Stanford Law Review." Stanford Law Review. N.p., 18 June 2012. Web. 8 Dec. 2012. <http://www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/discrimination-preemption>. "Executive Order 9066: The President Authorizes Japanese Relocation." History Matters: The U.S. Survey Course on the Web. N.p., n.d. Web. 8 Dec. 2012. <http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/5154/>. Seth, Hoy. "More and More States Introduce Costly Anti-Immigration Bills | Alternet." Alternet | Alternative News and Information. N.p., 9 Feb. 2012. Web. 8 Dec. 2012. <http://www.alternet.org/story/154072/more_and_more_states_introduce_costly_anti-immigration_bills?paging=off>.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Korematsu v. United States (1944) case was an unjustifiable case towards individuals with a particular race, but even though at the moment it seemed like the appropriate action to take for the protection of the people in our country, the action towards this race was completely inappropriate and unconstitutional. During the War of World War II, the president of the United States, Franklin Roosevelt put a float the Executive Order 9066 that targeted individuals from the Pacific Coast of Japanese ancestry both citizens and non-citizens. The order was to get any individual with in the area of the Pacific Coast to report to assembly centers where they were being detained until released by military authorities. Individuals with Japanese ancestry were being imprisoned without any evidence that they were a danger to the country and were deprived from their Constitutional rights. At first the first order was for any individual with Japanese ancestry to stay in their home with a curfew assigned to them, without…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The case as well the injustice of Fred Korematsu would have faded into obscurity if not in 1981 Legal Historian Peter Irons had not asked the Justice department for access to the case files. The case files containing memos of lawyer who has accused the Solicitor General of purgry, stating the Solicitor General lied to the Supreme Court about the real threat from Japanese-Americans (Bai 38). When asked by Irons, Korematsu agreed to go back to court. In going back to court he became and advocate to the injustice of Japanese-American internment camps in the 1940’s. When Korematsu was offered a settlement offer of a pardon for his crime, but not cleared from his record he refused, saying “ As long as my record stands in Federal court, any American citizen can be held in prison or in concentration camps without a trial or a hearing” (Bai 38). The Judge in the case agreed and ruled Korematsu as innocent and that internment was illegal, the Supreme Court struck down the “bill” and declared it un-constitution. In 1998 President Bill Clinton Awarded Korematsu with the Presidential Medal of Freedom, for his Principal Resistance. In 2004 outraged at the situation in Guantanamo Bay Involving Arabs, and suspected the same problems with them as with the…

    • 2136 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Summary - Fred Korematsu refused to obey the wartime order to leave his home and report to a relocation camp for Japanese Americans. He was arrested and convicted. After losing in the Court of Appeals, he appealed to the United States Supreme Court, challenging the constitutionality of the deportation order.…

    • 508 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Korematsu V Us

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During World War II, shortly after the attack on Pearl Harbor, President Franklin D. Roosevelt passed Executive Order 9066 which allowed the Secretary of War to declare certain areas as "military zones" and gave the military power over the attorney general. These newly declared military zones were made in the western US and were areas "from which any or all persons could be excluded". Although the document does not specify any races or ethnic groups, later orders issued that all people of Japanese decent (even American citizens) were excluded from these military zones that included all of California, Oregon, Washington and Hawaii. The Japanese in these areas were forced to evacuate to Internment Camps; where they could only bring what they could carry with them and where they would stay until further notice. Fred Korematsu was a Japanese-American citizen (American born) who decided to stay at his home in California during this time and was arrested for the violation of Civilian Exclusion Order No. 34. Korematsu challenged his arrest and the case was taken to the Supreme Court, where it was questioned if Executive Order 9066 violated Korematsu's 14th and 5th amendment rights (right to equal protection under the law and life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness). The court also questioned if Korematsu's constitutional rights were allowed to be violated due to the special circumstances of war. In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court sided with the government by ruling that the government was permitted to deny the Japanese of their constitutional rights because of military considerations, and that such exclusion was not beyond the war powers of congress and the president since it was done with national security in mind. Almost 40 years later after serving his sentence, Korematsu brought his case back to court filing for a writ of Coram Nobis to correct the previous ruling and achieve justice. Korematsu won this…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A 23-year-old Japanese American, Fred Toyosaburo Korematsu, defied Executive Order 9066 by President Franklin D Roosevelt and went into hiding instead of voluntarily relocating to an internment camp, where conditions were often harsh. In the wake of September 11, he spoke out against the dangers of racial profiling Arab Americans and urged US leaders not to repeat the wrongs inflicted upon Japanese Americans.…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mom: Honey, the executive order 9066 was instructions to the government to send all people of Japanese ancestry to internment camps.…

    • 195 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fred T. Korematsu

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    He did minor plastic surgery on his eyes to make him look less chinese. He also changed his name to Clyde Sarah and claimed to be of Spanish and Hawaiian descent. On May 30, 1942, he was arrested and taken to San Francisco county jail. While in jail, he was visited by Ernest Besig, the director of the San Francisco office of the American Civil Liberties Union, who asked Korematsu if he was willing to become the test case to challenge the constitutionality of the government’s imprisonment of Japanese Americans. On September 8, 1942, Korematsu was convicted in federal court for violating the military orders issued under Executive Order 9066. Korematsu and his family were transferred from many camps, and to one of the 10 incarceration camps for Japanese Americans that was set up by the government. Believing the discriminatory conviction went against freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution, Korematsu appealed his case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. In its December 1944 landmark decision, the high court ruled against him in a 6 to 3 decision, declaring that the incarceration was not caused by racism, and was justified by the Army’s claims that Japanese Americans were radio-signaling enemy ships from shore and were prone to…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The historical circumstances surrounding the case of Korematsu v. U.S. are as follows. In the 1940’s there was a strong anti-Japanese feeling throughout all of America. There was an act passed requiring all people of Japanese heritage to relocate from restricted areas. This is because of World War II and intense hatred towards the Japanese after the attack at Pearl Harbor. Korematsu was arrested and he brought it to the Supreme Court questioning the constitutionality of order #9066 and #34 which are the reasons he was arrested. The Supreme Court’s decision on the case was that because of the circumstances of world war the president and congress had the right to violate his constitutional rights. The court…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are several reasons that “Military necessity” had required the evacuation and the internment of persons of Japanese ancestry under Executive Order 9066. One reason was the mass removal and incarceration was due after pearl harbor. America wanted a mass removal and incarceration of Japanese and even Japanese Americans that even though they grew up in America there only loyal to japan and they were going to kill Americans. Also the FBI had already considered Japanese language teachers, Buddhist clergies, and Japanese organizations. Many propagandas were surfacing around America for example Dr. Seuss contributed with a picture of Japanese American holding TNT bombs and looking for a signal to blow up California showing this perception…

    • 231 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Japanese Relocation speech covered how the Japanese were treated, what their daily life was inside of an internment camp, and some of the features that came along with living there. The people were served free food, housing, and they even conjured up a community government. The President made it sound like living there was not that bad. On the other hand he explained his reason for why he ended up placing Japanese into internment camps. Later in the speech he states “The Japanese's were within a stone's throw of a Naval air base, shipyards, and oil wells, Japanese fishermen had every opportunity to watch the movement of our ships” (Document A). This statement proves that the Japanese could have been spying on us at any moment so the President took preliminary precautions to ensure that it would not happen. His decision to put them in internment camps was not only justified, it was also warranted and correct.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For four years, Japanese–American citizens really questioned exactly how much their U.S. citizenship really protected and kept them safe from harm and danger. The fear and pain that they went through should have had some sort of affect on the people responsible for these horrid camps. This shouldn’t be the case, everyone should feel safe and secure in the country that they call home.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    WW2 Internment

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In February 1942 President Roosevelt signed the Executive Order 9066, which declared that the U.S. armed forces could designate military areas in which certain people had to be expelled. The order itself did not specify that Japanese Americans should be removed from military areas, but this is essentially what took place. The order was used to force all Japanese Americans on the west coast of the United States into internment camps. The word internment means to confine, mainly used in times of war.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Texas Policy Report

    • 1234 Words
    • 4 Pages

    SU, RICK. "The States Of Immigration." William & Mary Law Review 54.4 (2013): 1339-1407. Academic Search Complete. Web. 8 Dec. 2013.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Over time, the United States Immigration system has undergone a myriad of comprehensive reforms which have proven to greatly impact the composition of its population. Though it is unclear whether these specific policies were products of theoretical assumptions, such as those associated with a country’s economic stature, the social norms of the time period, or further contributory factors such as the existing political landscape, the issue of immigration has continued to remain problematic in the 21st century and requires a structured approach. Preceding the current Obama administration and previous Bush administrations of the early 2000s, relatively recent major reforms were made to the U.S. immigration system through the passage of bills beginning in 1986 under the Immigration Reform and Control Act, in 1990 under the Immigration Act, and in the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (Bodvarsson and Van den Berg, 368). Each of these legislative bills proposes different sets of provisions which include, to some degree, address comprehensive immigration reform. However, the policy strategy to include these broader reforms on recent immigration legislation have largely failed to emerge from beyond the preliminary procedures of Congress as a result of strong opposition by today’s lawmakers.…

    • 2446 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Palerm, Juan V. Immigration: A Civil Rights Issue For The Americas. Ed. Susanne Jonas and Suzie Dod Thomas. Wilmington, Delaware: Scholarly Resources Inc., 1999.…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays