Holder's Argument Against Racial Profiling

No one wants to be accused of crimes for their ethnics, religion or race, in fact, it may be considered profiling as well as discrimination. Opinions of the U.S. laws differ between whites, blacks and Hispanics. Where whites assume everything is all tied up the blacks and Hispanics know that they have the short end of the deal. Due to the objections of non whites in the month of December 2014 Attorney General Eric Holder attempted to wane profiling. Shooting an unarmed black man with no punishments is one of the effects that is diminishing the trust of the people in local officers. Loretta Lynch, another federal prosecutor, agrees with Holder and sets a sense of community between police and inhabitants as a top priority. Although George W. Bush created some laws of profiling in 2003 Eric Holder believed and fought for more.
These federal laws don’t apply everywhere, two examples of place that they wouldn’t be applied is border patrols at the country’s southwest boundaries as well as airline security. Twenty states don’t have laws against racial profiling because there is no uniform standard for police departments in communities. Profiling is beginning to cause arguments between law enforcement and pedestrians, one main topic is the new stop-and-frisk program. As the program continually increased the amount of fallouts the judge finally deemed the program to disturb the rights of the minority residents. France, is a highly populated area that also has many profiling concerns most concerning Arabs and blacks. These concerns were brought to court where they were then dismissed by a judge in