Preview

Homosexual Marriage

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
323 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Homosexual Marriage
Homosexual Marriage

Supreme Court of the United States had decided to hear arguments in two gay-marriage cases, one is Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), and another is Proposition 8 (Prop 8). The case will be tried in 2013, and the court will issue its ruling in June.
The Defense of Marriage Act is a United States federal law which signed by Bill Clinton in 1996 restricts federal marriage benefits and required inter-state marriage recognition to only opposite-sex marriages in the United States.

Another one, Proposition 8 was a California ballot proposition and a state constitutional amendment passed in the November 2008 state elections. The measure added a new provision to the California Constitution, which provides that “only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.”

These two cases will have big influence on whole America, so everyone has to know about what results might be.
The first result might be both of two cases were sustained by the United States Supreme Court. Homosexual marriage is still illegal in California, besides, do not recognized by Federal Government of the United States.

The second result might be Prop 8 is unconstitutional. If this is truth, legalizing homosexual marriage will immediately take effect.
The third result might be Prop 8 is unconstitutional and it is applicable to every state. Thus, homosexual marriage can be hold in whole America.

The forth result might be DOMA is unconstitutional. Then, Federal Government of the United States will recognized homosexual marriage, and also can have same benefits as heterosexual marriage, such as inheritance-tax relief or the right to file joint tax returns.
Whatever, it is believed that the congress made up by most of Democratic Party member will cooperate with supporters of homosexual marriage to overturn the Prop 8, and request a ballot in 2014. Because of the opening thoughts about marriage in California, to legalize homosexual marriage is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In the November 2008 United States election cycle, the state of California had Proposition 8 on the ballot. This was in response to the state legalizing gay marriage through the judicial system. After the legalization of the practice, opponents of gay marriage were able to put Proposition 8 on the ballot in an attempt to overturn the court ruling. Ultimately they were successful, but not without millions of dollars in campaign advertising. This paper will examine the main advertisement named, 'Gathering Storm '. This ad was shown throughout the state, and in retrospect seems to have turned the tide of the Proposition 8 battle, helping enormously to swing voters in favor of banning marriage between two members of the same sex.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: Groups of the same sex couples sued their relevant state agencies in Ohio, Kentucky, Michigan, and Tennessee to challenge the constitutionality of those states bans on the same sex marriage or refusal to recognize legal same sex marriages that occurred in jurisdiction that provide for such marriages. James Obergefell (plaintiffs) in each case argued that the states statutes violated Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the fourteenth Amendment, and one group of plaintiffs also brought claims under the Civil Rights act. In all the cases, the trial court found in favor of the plaintiffs. The U.S Courts of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reverse and held that the states bans on same sex marriage and refusal to recognize marriages performed in other states did not violated the couples fourteenth amendment rights to equal protection and due process.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1In a 7-2 decision, written by Justice Anthony Kennedy, the Lawrence v. Texas case (2003) ruled that state laws were unconstitutional and the Supreme Court overturned the Texas law as a violation of the right to privacy and the Equal Protection clause of the fourteenth Amendment. 2The majority opinion indicates that the Court of Appeals considered their decision in Bowers v. Hardwick to be controlling on the federal due process aspect of the case. Harris County Police officers were dispatched to Lawrence’s home in response to a weapon disturbance, where he was found engaged in sexual activity with another man, and they were arrested under a Texas ruling that prohibited such behavior between two men. 2The effect of Texas' sodomy law is not just limited to the threat of prosecution or consequence of conviction. Texas' sodomy law brands all homosexuals as criminals, thereby making it more difficult for homosexuals to be treated in the same manner as everyone else.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Same sex marriage legalization has been a continue argument for years. It was admitted as legal by California government in June 2008, but it was halted due to the passage of Proposition 8. There is no wonder why people take Proposition 8 as hate towards LGBTI community. Thus, Morse wrote a article in National Review Online to appeal more supporter, and to argue there is no hate toward LGBTI community from Proposition 8. Her rhetorical choices help to increase the probability that there are more readers will support her argument.…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though many know of the court case, not all people know the history of it. The part that many know is that the people were gay, lesbian, and so on, and most people also know that they were fighting for the right to marry. What too many people do not know is that even though court Justices were against it, the majority did not care since it did not affect them. Justice Scalia said the following in his statement, “The substance of today’s decree is not of immense personal importance to me.” Since in many states, previous to the law passing, barely anyone who was same-sex could marry their spouse.Though this privilege was granted to opposite-sex spouses, along with insured plans, medical plans, and many other privileges. When the law was passed, same-sex couples would have the same privileges. “Insured plans in every state will require to offer coverage to same-sex spouses to the extent such plans cover opposite-sex…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1996, the Supreme Court enacted The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) which the third section defined the words marriage and spouse to refer to the legal joining of a man and a woman. This would legally bar any same-sex couples from receiving legal…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prop 8

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The planitffs argue that prop 8 violates the equal protection clause of the fourteenth. Proponents argue that heterosexual marriage was an "essiantial institution of society." Both parties did not dispute that the right to marry is fundamental the only difference between the two parties is who is "allowed" to get married and who is not. According to the District Court Ruling on prop 8, California is said to encourage sexual activity to happen within a marriage, basiacally a marriage license to participate in sexual intercourse. California allows almost partnership , but therwith that. Domestic partnerships are distinct from marriages and do not provide the same social meaning as a marriage does. all same sex couples only one option and that is domestic e is one problem…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes on Prop 8

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Proposition 8 should have been voted Yes by all California residents to limit marriage between heterosexual couples because boundaries need to be established when giving any person a right. Opposes of this view make the argument that people should be able to marry whomever they want. Making a statement like this could be detrimental to people who try to take advantage of some of the benefits that come along with marriage such as filing taxes, health benefits, or inheritance. What if people that use this law to marry more than one person at the same time, marry their own family members, or marry a friend. I do believe that this proposition was too vague and will allow people to use the law to marry whoever they want and use it as an abuse of power. I do agree that marriage is something that God ordained so I cannot judge any same sex couple…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    True Or False Analysis

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    __False_ 1.The U.S. Supreme Court decided that it violates the Constitution to deny same-sex couples the right to marry. The majority of State X citizens disagreed with this decision, and the State X legislature passes a statute that prohibits same-sex marriage licenses from being issued. As a result, same-sex couples in State X will NOT have the right to obtain a marriage license there.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution is the most important set of laws in U.S. history. In 1787, fifty-five delegates representing twelve of the thirteen states went to Philadelphia to fix the national government. This was due to the existing government that was built under The Articles Of Confederation being too weak. The challenge was trying to create a strong central government were a person or a group of people could not take total control creating a tyrannical government. There are many types of tyranny, and The Constitution has a good way of protecting America from it by Federalism, Separation of Powers, Checks and balances, and Big States vs. Little States.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    California Proposition 8 (California Marriage Protection Act) was a state-wide ballot proposition passed in the November 4, 2008 state election that made same sex marriage illegal in California. The vote which won by 52% adds exactly 14 words to the California State Constitution, "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California." To qualify for the ballot, Proposition 8 needed 694,354 valid petition signatures, equal to 8% of the total votes cast for governor in the November 2006 General Election. The initiative proponents submitted 1,120,801 signatures, and on June 2, 2008, the initiative qualified for the November 4, 2008 election ballot through the random sample signature check. The passage of Prop 8 was a major victory for religious conservatives seeking to ban gay marriage in other states, and a crippling setback for the gay rights movement nationwide.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When it comes to Proposition 8 I would have voted against it all the way. I have often thought what gives anyone the right to take away civil rights from anyone gay or straight. I personally have struggled with this debate on so many different levels it still unbelievable to me that in court in the world would deny civil rights down to such a basic level. The fourteenth Amendment clearly has a double standard attached to it when it comes to Proposition 8. Basically saying that we can’t deny gays and lesbian civil rights within the state, but we can tell you it’s not legal to marry the person you love and are committed to because it’s not the norm of traditional marriage.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Same sex marriage was not officially recognized by the United States until 2013, when the Supreme Court ruled that only legally recognizing marriage between a man and a woman was unconstitutional. However, five years earlier, in 2008, California made same-sex marriage legal within its geographic borders (Wikipedia).The California legalization of same-sex marriage today is very similar to its progressive history of adopting controversial legislation before the same legislation is adopted nation-wide.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A very big topic that lingers on the hearts and minds of so many Americans today, on the desks of so many politicians and in so many courtrooms around the country today is gay marriage. There are two very identifiable sides to this debate and both sides have very defendable points of view, which are constantly being publically expressed by radicals and extremist from both sides of the spectrum. My point of views differ from those who believe that gay marriage should remain illegal however, I am going to look at both sides of this huge debate and argue the point that homosexuals should be granted the right to marry whomever they please because it is not only unconstitutional, but unjust and logically improper to forfeit to this group of people the same, equal rights to marriage as heterosexuals simply because of their sexual orientation.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As of November 7, 2012, gay marriage has been legalized in nine U.S. states (Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa, Vermont, New Hampshire, and Washington) including the District of Columbia. However, thirty-one states have constitutional amendments banning gay marriage and six states have laws banning gay marriage. There are many arguments surrounding this controversy that express extremely different opinions regarding supposed outcomes and benefits that would come along with legalizing gay marriage.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays