Preview

How Did Alexander Iii Reverse the Reforms of Alexander Ii?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1426 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Alexander Iii Reverse the Reforms of Alexander Ii?
Improvements in green

To what extent did Alexander III reverse the reforms of his predecessor Alexander II?

In many respects, there is no doubt that Alexander III was the most effective Tsar in such the short reign that he had. He was referred to as a reactionary, unlike his father Alexander II who was known as a reformer. He managed to please the people with his Russian figure and attitude, he changed their attitude and he made tsarism look all the better, all in a short period of time. Despite their different policies, they had the same goals/ambitions inside their head in the long run, and that was to strengthen Autocracy in the Russian empire but Alexander III did this by reversing what his father had done as he felt he knew better ways of dealing with the situation and strengthening the Tsarist position.

The first thing that Alexander III did when he came into power to contradict his fathers reforms was to recall the decision of creating the constitution. Alexander III was a firm believer of the absolute power and judgment that autocracy and Russian history owned, he felt that Russia should stick to their traditional rules and the way things were run. Alexander put thins in to change this but Alexander III would not allow this and so reversed some of what he had done to make sure the Russian tradition stayed in place. He felt that a democratic Parliament was such a western way to think, NOT Russian. He preferred the principles of personal rule and he was so firm on this, he distrusted the bureaucracy. This lead to him wanting to be around conservative ministers such a Pobodenostev because he knew that if he was surrounded by the right people with the same mind has him, they too would want to reverse the reforms of Alexander II unlike the ones that he usually were with which was a mix of conservative and Liberal ministers that were influencing the changes in the first place.

For many the many years that Alexander II tried to boost the tolerance of other

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The defeat in the Crimean war was arguably the main reason why Alexander II made a series of reforms when he came into power. The devastating loss of the war proved the backwardness of Russia in relation to other powers and even though peasant unrest and the criticisms of serfdom were partially responsible for influencing Alexander II, the decision to make changes primarily came from the loss of the Crimean war.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alexander ll became Tsar in 1855 after succeeding Tsar Nicholas l and was regarded as a “liberator” throughout his time as Tsar, until an attempted assassination attempt on him in 1866 were he turned more reactionary. Alexander ll was assassinated in March 1881, he was not radical and believed in a slow and progressive change, due to this he gathered much opposition to him and was eventually killed by The Peoples Will, and this kicked off ‘the era of great reforms’ [5].…

    • 3481 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander knew that the offspring of these marriages would be rejected within both cultures, but he knew that this would only create loyal subjects that would have no choice but to serve him. Although, after his death, most of these marriages would only end up being rejected. But, Alexander only had the goal of achieving the perfect empire in which the Greek culture would far surpass the others. And of course becoming the only king in the world, this being due to his huge amount of ego. But, he did help improve the conquered empires, by which the Greeks had brought with them their art, literature and a bit of their own language. Which, heavily influenced those within the empires. It helped improve their education and even their literacy skills in their daily lives. The influence of the Greeks even went as far as taking over the former Persian Empire and replacing it under the same laws and policies that the Greeks abided by. The Greeks also in stowed their beliefs in their Gods. While, not much is known today about what laws Alexander exactly put into to place, there is still evidence of his spreading of the Greek culture. Thanks to Alexander, most of what is known today is due to the influence he and his army had upon those they conquered. He had modeled the other governments after his own, while spreading his culture along the way. And although, he is mostly known today through his military accomplishments, he still managed to reform and educate the people of his…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lastly, Alexander the Great was a very wise ruler. When he conquered Persia he allowed them to continue to be ran by Persians, when he conquered a new territory he would have his men marry women from the area to spread his influence, and he would rule as if he were a god-king to the conquered peoples religions. All of these actions were very strategic and in the long run kept Alexander very successful in his ruling which earns him the status of Great.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexanders respect of other people's beliefs was one of the biggest reasons he is considered great. While other conquerors in this time period, like the persians, would try to destroy and get rid of other people's cultures Alexander would study and learn from them. He did this to such an extent in Egypt that they even referred to him as a god and pharaoh. In other places he would study their beliefs, and try to understand them as a people, and he may have been doing this to learn how to control them, but based on his character it is more likely that he did it so learn how to respect them.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alexander the Great like most heroes in history have traits that makes it possible for him to be able to do great things. Alexander of Macedonia was a 20 year old leader who got his empire from passed down from family, Macedonia and city-states in Greece. Alexander decided to attempt to conquer the entire Persian Empire, from Egypt to India, In this process he did things historians question made him great or not. Alexander the Great was great because of his intelligence, empathy for others and leadership.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first reason Alexander was a dictator, is because he took way too many lives.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander was able to do all of this at the young age of thirty-three years old. The Hellenistic Culture blended Greek Culture with Cultures that he saw while conquering new lands. Alexander made an effort to bring people from different cultures and places together. He did this many ways.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his early age, Alexander The Great was involved in many battles and high command position. Alexander…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the “not-so-great” was a psychotic maniac with a huge ego. He was conceded and had absolutely no concern for others. For example, when Alexander’s army was struggling across the hot, dry desert of sand, he could’ve taken them around the desert, so they didn’t have to suffer. (doc.D) Also, every new place Alexander went to he founded a new city and named it after himself….. Alexandria!!! In total he named eleven cities after himself. Because he was spoiled and everyone treated him like he was royalty at a very young age, he came up with the idea that he was part god and told everyone to treat him that way. (B.E.) There were always consequences for when people tried to stand up against Alexander. One example is in the battle with Tyre, when they refused to surrender, so he wouldn’t let them be and ordered his army to destruct and destroy all of Tyre into little pieces.(Doc.C) Therefore, because of his lack of concern for others and huge ego, he was proven,…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Well, our opinion is that Alexander the Great is great. He was attacked by the Persian and he successfully defeated them. Alexander moved south along the eastern Mediterranean. Many cities surrender the Alexander the Great. Some of the men that was in the other armies that they were in, transferred to Alexander’s army. In 332 B.C.E Alexander entered the world of egypt, a country that had experienced on and off periods of Persian rule for two centuries. With Mediterranean and Egypt secured, the Persians were deprived of naval bases and Alexander was free to move inland to conquer the eastern half of the Persian Empire. Alexander had sources of 1 million troops to take over states and cities. Darius III on the other hand brought soldiers all over and even beyond his empire. Persian was on a rampage and Alexander continued to battle against them until they…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In conclusion, Alexander deserves the title of “The Great”. He deserves it because of his education, military accomplishments, and his courage. He was tutored by one of the most influential philosophers, Aristotle. He created the largest empire at the time and was generous with his spoils. Alexander was courageous in battle, and fought alongside his men. Yes, he did have some faults, but the positives outweigh the negatives. Alexander does deserve his title, and to say that he does not is unfair to him and what…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great is recognized as one of the greatest commanders that world has ever seen, if not the greatest. Alexander first led troops as a mere teenager and became king afterwards due to the assassination of his father. He decided to expand the Greek Empire, which his dad, King Philip, started but couldn't finish. At just the age of twenty years old, he set…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Persian empire at its peak has long been seen as one of the largest wholes during the classical era, and few have rivaled its size. The land that Alexander the Great was able to conquer, however, was one of the few that served as an appropriate challenge. Around the time of 338 B.C.E through 323 B.C.E., Alexander's collected mass was a whole. Of a Greek origin, Alexander was taught by Aristotle, the great philosopher, and it can be inferred that he used the strategic methods learned, among other things, to assist him during his expansion. It was short lived, however, when he died of an unknown cause at an early age of thirty-three. Even though his empire crumbled, his legacy lived on. Multiple cities, strongly influenced by Alexander, erected,…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II succeeded in making a bad situation in Russia even worse. He became a leader at a difficult time, and could never stop the process of revolution. The Tsar was not a good leader, and was out of touch with the Russian people. He was also weak and indecisive, and extremely stubborn. Nicholas II was not equipped to effectively rule a country the size of Russia, and with a vast variety of people with different language, religion, race and culture. Additionally, Nicholas II was mainly concerned with family issues, instead of being concerned with political issues. It was these traits in Nicholas II?s personality that hindered him in being able to attempt to steer Russia away from revolution.…

    • 1455 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics