Preview

To what extent was the defeat of the Crimean war Alexander’s excuse for change.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
811 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To what extent was the defeat of the Crimean war Alexander’s excuse for change.
To what extent was the defeat of the Crimean war Alexander’s excuse for change.

The defeat in the Crimean war was arguably the main reason why Alexander II made a series of reforms when he came into power. The devastating loss of the war proved the backwardness of Russia in relation to other powers and even though peasant unrest and the criticisms of serfdom were partially responsible for influencing Alexander II, the decision to make changes primarily came from the loss of the Crimean war.
The Crimean war was fought by Russia and an alliance of Britain, France, Prussia, Austria and the Ottoman Empire from 1853 to 1856. Due to the decline of the Ottoman Empire, each country was competing for influence in the Middle East, with Russia attempting to gain access to its seas. In the end Russia was vastly overpowered, leading Alexander II to speedily begin peace talks, the Treaty of Paris bringing an end to the bloodshed. The defeat of the war highlighted the fact that Russia had lost its dominance as a military power, having had its warships banned from the Black Sea. Why such a vast country with a strong military tradition lost was due to the traditional values of Russia, like the out-dated military manoeuvres, the out-dated bayonet against the newest rifles, the inability to support the war effort and the undersupplied armies due to a lack of transport. Russian troops weren’t equipped to fight against the advanced weapons of the French and British, when their ammunition ran out they were unable to restock since there was no form of transport other than ox drawn carts. Proof of Russian backwardness was exemplified here; Russia’s serfdom based economy was unable to support the cost of the war, influencing Alexander II greatly to change.
This links in with the Serfdom based economy that couldn’t support the cost of warfare because of the backwardness of its practices. With the vast rural population using the same farming techniques used hundreds of years before

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Chapter 27 Review

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4: Alexander II’s reforms included abolishing serfdom, improving law codes, establishing local political councils, increased military recruitment, and military promotions based off merit. Also women gained a higher education and had more job opportunities as a result.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    APW CCOT Soviet Union

    • 1392 Words
    • 2 Pages

    losses in the Russo­Japanese War, and the Crimean War, the Soviet Union began reordering their…

    • 1392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | * The land given to the peasants was not of good quality, the peasants also had to pay the state long term installments. The peasants were also responsible to the village commune that forced them to pay their installments and not be free of the land. * The local assemblies couldn’t attain much because of the interruption of bureaucrats afraid that it would turn into a self –government. * Alexander’s reform policies led to increasing reform movements that led to a populist group assassinating him, making his son turn against any reform and go back to repression. His reform policies also set the foundation for the fall of Russia’s Monarchy in 1917.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even from a young age Alexander had strongly opposed the opinions of his father, joining the ‘party of action’ in the debate concerning war with Turkey when Alexander II was all in favour of keeping the peace. This attitude he emulated with his counter-reforms where he made it very clear that Russia would remain firmly an autocracy, and that advisors were simply there only to advise. The ministers in favour of his father’s governmental reforms were made to resign which, alongside his counter-reforms, made very clear to all his intentions to take Russia back to a firmly Tsar-run state.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many of the opposition fled to other European countries where they continued to plot against the Tsar. This shows how Alexander lll had caused Russia to go back in progress politically by exiling all of their possible contenders. This allowed the Tsar to have much more control over Russia much like before Alexander ll reign. The persecution of Jews caused many to join radical parties and organisations. This shows us how there was not even the slightest bit of democracy within Russia, and how Alexander lll had caused Russia to go back in progress. Another major problem in Russia was the growing population of peasants. This caused famines within Russia in 1892 and 1893. This famine was a cause of many peasants death which shows how Russia did not have the money or resources to keep up with their growing population. This showed a lack in progress as they could not even support their country’s people with…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander III also opposed the military reforms his father had made; he changed the conscription rules and reduced the size of the Russian Army. This was welcomed by the people, they had previously been a bloody nation and very militaristic, and the people of Russia felt this was a large step to become a more peaceful nation and so, opposition that were unhappy of Russia’s war like tendencies, were reduced. However, Alexander III did avoid sorting a peace between Russia and Turkey, and wanted to go ahead with a war. Although people did not want war, they respected his decision and saw that the new Tsar was a man that would not put up with any opposition to his nation or his title, and so opposition was reduced again.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is said that Alexander III ruled over Russia for 13 years with the Cossack whip called the nagaika. Due to his harsh reign, Alexander managed to suppress any opposition that posed a threat to his position as Tsar and despite this, this period of time became a period of stability for Russia.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Patriotic War of 1812, or more commonly known as the Russian Campaign, significantly altered the course of European history as Napoleon Bonaparte, a French military leader and adversary of Russia faced a notable downfall of his military rule and career. Czar Alexander I’s fueled France’s campaign in Russia through his withdraw of participation in the Continental Blockade, which was originally established by Napoleon in order to dominate Great Britain through repressing its economic connections with other European nations. Due to the fact that Britain’s ports were the center of commercial trade and exports all across Europe, countries signed under the Continental Blockade faced a dramatic economic downfall; therefore, Russia’s response to this blockade was to openly trade with Britain through black markets, and even “introduced a new trade tariff that discriminated against France and favoured Great Britain”. During the earlier stages of the Napoleonic era which lasted from 1799 through to 1815, the French military leader’s talent commonly allowed him to win quick and decisive battles during domestic and international conflicts. Napoleon’s defeat during the Russian campaign proved to European nations that his tactics in warfare were immensely flawed; and his failure to overpower this vast, Eastern European country was due to three significant factors: tactics employed by the Russian troops, the environment, and the Grande Armee’s weaknesses within itself.…

    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Crimean War Realism

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The War began with the Russian invasion of Ottoman provinces along the Danube, specifically Moldavia and Walachia. In response, the British and French navies were moved to the Black Sea.(Crimean Campaign). Allied Ottoman, British, French, and Sardinian forces…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander II is the Czar of Russia Nicholas I’s son. Later in time Alexander made multiple reforms that had many consequences on Russia. Russia had a huge lack of development. They had lost a major battle against the combined forces of France, Great Britain, Sardinia, and the Ottoman Empire in 1856. After the war, Alexander decided to make Russia more modern and create social change. By doing this Alexander thought it would make Russia stronger and able to compete with Western Europe for world power. The first of his reforms was to free serfs/laborers in 1861. However the plan only went about halfway. Peasant communities received half of the farmland in the county while Nobles took the other half. In order for other Russians to buy the land…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Decembrists Revolt

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the early nineteenth century, Napoleon Bonaparte was conquering much of Europe and was beginning to move his way towards Russia. After Napoleon fled Russia, Alexander led his troops across Europe to beat Napoleon and free the different countries from the French rule. Most of the Russian army had never left Russia and they quickly saw how much more advanced Western Europe was compared to Russia. They were confused as to how the west, who had underwent many years of war and oppression from Napoleon, still lived better than they did. There was a new hope for a constitution since they fought for the rest of Europe and gave them back their freedom, Alexander would grant the same freedoms to the Russians and they had restored their faith in the government and Alexander.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Revolts were frequent, 1467 of them since 1800. Nicholas I saw this and created nine secret committees to find a way to end serfdom. Alexander II was part of one of those committees. He was also there to be the acting Tsar when Nicholas I was away. Therefore Alexander II was the most prepared heir to the Tsar the empire has ever had. Alexander made a very good start in change when he became Tsar. He stopped all army recruitment, which meant it was no longer forced to enter the army, nor was it a punishment for crimes. Applying for military was completely voluntary. Alexander also released all of the Decembrists, who are people who tried to overthrow his father in 1825 and the Poles, who revolted in 1830. He also lifted restrictions for travelling, 26,000 passports were granted in 1859. Allowing people to travel to Western Europe and learning more about liberal culture and allowing Russia to catch up with the rest of…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    russia revision guide

    • 7465 Words
    • 24 Pages

    Why did defeat in the Crimean War lead to reform under Alexander II? (12 marks)…

    • 7465 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Serfdom had become the great moral and political issue for the Russian government by the 1840’s. Then the Crimean War of 1853 to 1856 brought crisis, arising out of a dispute with France over who should protect Christian Shrines in the Ottoman empire. This war resulted in a huge loss for Russia due to its lack of industrialization. This was a huge turning point for Russia as it raised massive peasant rebellion and the need to industrialize. In 1855 Nicolas I died, handing the throne to a new Russian Czar, Alexander II. Later in 1861, Alexander freed the serfs in hopes of the emergence of a middle class. He believed after emancipating the serfs some would succeed to generate an entrepreneurial…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays