Preview

Opposition to Alexander Iii of Russia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
594 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Opposition to Alexander Iii of Russia
How successfully did Alexander III suppress opposition?

Bibliography:

http://countrystudies.us/russia/6.htm http://www.funfront.net/hist/russia/revo1905.htm It is said that Alexander III ruled over Russia for 13 years with the Cossack whip called the nagaika. Due to his harsh reign, Alexander managed to suppress any opposition that posed a threat to his position as Tsar and despite this, this period of time became a period of stability for Russia.
Alexander strongly believed that to make his position as Tsar unchallengeable he had to withdraw the reforms his father had begun. To enforce these counter-reforms Alexander relied upon his secret police formed named the Okhrana, headed by Plehve. He used the Okhrana to help him govern Russia with terror and to get rid of any opposition. By 1894, over 5,400 people had been exiled to Siberia or sentenced to hard labour. Many people were also hanged and censorship was tightened significantly to stop the publication of anything that could fuel or encourage people to oppose Alexander.
Alexander could not reverse the emancipation of the serfs that occurred under his father’s rule in 1861, but instead he reversed the powers of the zemstva. He introduced land captains and gave them many powers so that they could enforce the laws of the land and make sure that all the taxes raised by the Ministry of the Interior were paid. These land captains could send people into exile, order floggings and could even issue the death penalty if peasants refused to pay these taxes. In this way, Alexander had control of the peasants because of their submission through fear.
Alexander also used education and the church to control his citizens. He wouldn’t allow any student to study History – they had to obtain permission from the Minister of Education. Alexander also used the church to preach obedience and often confessions were passed on to the Okhrana and used as evidence to prosecute any offenders and remove them.

NOT SUCCESSFUL



Bibliography: http://countrystudies.us/russia/6.htm http://www.funfront.net/hist/russia/revo1905.htm It is said that Alexander III ruled over Russia for 13 years with the Cossack whip called the nagaika. Due to his harsh reign, Alexander managed to suppress any opposition that posed a threat to his position as Tsar and despite this, this period of time became a period of stability for Russia. Alexander strongly believed that to make his position as Tsar unchallengeable he had to withdraw the reforms his father had begun. To enforce these counter-reforms Alexander relied upon his secret police formed named the Okhrana, headed by Plehve. He used the Okhrana to help him govern Russia with terror and to get rid of any opposition. By 1894, over 5,400 people had been exiled to Siberia or sentenced to hard labour. Many people were also hanged and censorship was tightened significantly to stop the publication of anything that could fuel or encourage people to oppose Alexander. Alexander could not reverse the emancipation of the serfs that occurred under his father’s rule in 1861, but instead he reversed the powers of the zemstva. He introduced land captains and gave them many powers so that they could enforce the laws of the land and make sure that all the taxes raised by the Ministry of the Interior were paid. These land captains could send people into exile, order floggings and could even issue the death penalty if peasants refused to pay these taxes. In this way, Alexander had control of the peasants because of their submission through fear. Alexander also used education and the church to control his citizens. He wouldn’t allow any student to study History – they had to obtain permission from the Minister of Education. Alexander also used the church to preach obedience and often confessions were passed on to the Okhrana and used as evidence to prosecute any offenders and remove them. NOT SUCCESSFUL Many of the nationalities within Russia, particularly Poles, Finns, Latvians, Lithuanians and Ukrainians, were averse to the idea of Russification and due to this they secretly intensified their own nationalism. Many Jews emigrated to escape the pogroms or joined underground radical movements. Many secret organizations and political movements continued developing despite Alexander’s attempts to quell them. For example, in 1892, Russian Poles founded the Polish Socialist Party in Paris to try and reunite Poland with its former territory now in Austria-Hungary, Germany and Russia. In 1883, the first Russian Marxist group formed in St. Petersburg in opposition to Alexander’s rule. Many attempts to overthrow Alexander were made by the proletariat who gradually grew in number throughout Alexander’s reign in response to the economic reforms that he continued to make. These workers eventually made up the group of people who revolted in the 1905 Revolution and this proves that Alexander III was not successful in suppressing opposition long term, as his attempts meant that a revolution would occur in the reign of the next Tsar. Ultimately, although Alexander did not eliminate any opposition that posed a threat to his position as Tsar of Russia and merely forced any organisations underground, despite the fact that there were many assassination attempts, Alexander successfully suppressed opposition to the point when he died on a kidney disease in 1894, not by being killed by those who opposed him. In this way, he was successful: however long term he was not as successful as he left many problems for his successor Nicholas II to deal with.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    One thing that had changed in Russia from when Alexander had come into power in 1881 was that there was increased repression regarding politics. The Statue of State Security was introduced which brought government-controlled courts into the country and could now put on trial political opponents and they could also be arrested too without the need of a jury. This shows change as a lot harsher punishments were introduced that could be imposed on opponents of the government such as being sent to and exiled in Siberia and being hunted down by the Okhrana – Russia’s secret police. Although there was repression of political opponents before Alexander III’s reign, the punishment wasn’t as harsh and the violence that was encouraged by extremist groups was a lot more widespread and happened regularly compared to when Alexander III had introduced the Statue of State Security where attacks were something that didn’t happen as often. Therefore, it contributes to the idea that Russia was unrecognisable in 1894 compared with 1881.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the period 1855 to 1954, opposition to Russian governments was a common occurrence due to dissatisfaction of many civilians’ lives and the lack of development seen throughout Russia. However, as much as there were some successful movements throughout 1905 such as the Bolsheviks gaining support and eventually gaining power, there were also several failed attempts due to intense use of violence, terror and censorship by the state. It is arguable that whether opposition was successful, merely came down to the strength of the opposition group or the weakness of the government in power.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | * The land given to the peasants was not of good quality, the peasants also had to pay the state long term installments. The peasants were also responsible to the village commune that forced them to pay their installments and not be free of the land. * The local assemblies couldn’t attain much because of the interruption of bureaucrats afraid that it would turn into a self –government. * Alexander’s reform policies led to increasing reform movements that led to a populist group assassinating him, making his son turn against any reform and go back to repression. His reform policies also set the foundation for the fall of Russia’s Monarchy in 1917.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The defeat in the Crimean war was arguably the main reason why Alexander II made a series of reforms when he came into power. The devastating loss of the war proved the backwardness of Russia in relation to other powers and even though peasant unrest and the criticisms of serfdom were partially responsible for influencing Alexander II, the decision to make changes primarily came from the loss of the Crimean war.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alexander ll became Tsar in 1855 after succeeding Tsar Nicholas l and was regarded as a “liberator” throughout his time as Tsar, until an attempted assassination attempt on him in 1866 were he turned more reactionary. Alexander ll was assassinated in March 1881, he was not radical and believed in a slow and progressive change, due to this he gathered much opposition to him and was eventually killed by The Peoples Will, and this kicked off ‘the era of great reforms’ [5].…

    • 3481 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many of the opposition fled to other European countries where they continued to plot against the Tsar. This shows how Alexander lll had caused Russia to go back in progress politically by exiling all of their possible contenders. This allowed the Tsar to have much more control over Russia much like before Alexander ll reign. The persecution of Jews caused many to join radical parties and organisations. This shows us how there was not even the slightest bit of democracy within Russia, and how Alexander lll had caused Russia to go back in progress. Another major problem in Russia was the growing population of peasants. This caused famines within Russia in 1892 and 1893. This famine was a cause of many peasants death which shows how Russia did not have the money or resources to keep up with their growing population. This showed a lack in progress as they could not even support their country’s people with…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After the war in 1856 Nicholas's son Alexander II decided to move Russia toward modern needs and social changes. Alexander believed that his reforms would allow Russia to compete with western Europe for world power. The first of Alexander's reform was an official order for freeing the serfs in 1861. However, putting an end to serfdom only went halfway. Instead of individual peasants, peasant communities were given about half the farmland in the country, nobles kept the other half and the government paid the wealthy people for their land. However, each peasant community had 49 years to pay the government for the land it had received. Therefore, while the serfs were legally free the money that was owed still tied them to the land. Political and…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alexander I Dbq

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Austria and Prussia did not want to offend Alexander, so they joined their kingdoms to Alexander's creation, agreeing with Alexander that the "sublime truths" of Christianity ought to guide relations between nations and guide the domestic affairs of nations. Strong religious conviction, they held, was necessary for maintaining upright and loyal subjects. The rulers of Russia, Austria and Prussia agreed that challenges to their authoritarian rule by liberalism and revolution ought to remain suppressed. Within Russia, Tsar Alexander I had to reform the state of Russia quite a bit as territories such as Poland and Finland were at risk of being lost due to nationalistic movements within them . Therefore, the Tsar decided to try to unify Poland with Russia, giving them a similar constitution to the one in Russia. Being enlightened by western and philosophical theories, Alexander successfully modernized the highly traditional monarchy in Russia and began the process of creating a constitutional monarchy. It was Alexander who felt that the key to successful constitutional rule was the abolition of serfdom, an institution that dominated Russia for more than 600 years, in order to boost the nation’s economy. A plan to abolish…

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Alexander also liberalized education and curriculums, he founded gymnasiums (where history was not allowed to be taught) and the Zemstvos had the right to open primary…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After Alexander the Great inherited his father’s kingdom, he executed anyone who showed sign of conspiracy against him. He conquered an enemy city called Thebes, enslaved the cities families and sold the women and children into slavery. Alexander then demolished every building in the city. He moved onto Persia; who were the rivals of Macedonias. His troops took control of the Persian capital and destroyed all of their temples. Those Persian temples were part of their culture and way of life. Alexander learned about Buddhism from the Brahmins and then executed them.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When Alexander the Great conquered Tyre, he mercilessly killed over 50 thousand people. Not only did he murder this many people, but he also ruled with brutality as an important factor. While destroying cities, and only sparing some religious monuments, he managed to become a “success.” Pounding fear into the brains of followers, some, like the Persians, surrendered to him to be spared or simply out of respect. While Alexander did show mercy on the Persians and some of those who respected him, he still committed his crimes.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Revolts were frequent, 1467 of them since 1800. Nicholas I saw this and created nine secret committees to find a way to end serfdom. Alexander II was part of one of those committees. He was also there to be the acting Tsar when Nicholas I was away. Therefore Alexander II was the most prepared heir to the Tsar the empire has ever had. Alexander made a very good start in change when he became Tsar. He stopped all army recruitment, which meant it was no longer forced to enter the army, nor was it a punishment for crimes. Applying for military was completely voluntary. Alexander also released all of the Decembrists, who are people who tried to overthrow his father in 1825 and the Poles, who revolted in 1830. He also lifted restrictions for travelling, 26,000 passports were granted in 1859. Allowing people to travel to Western Europe and learning more about liberal culture and allowing Russia to catch up with the rest of…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Alexander II came into the throne in 1855 right in the middle of Crimean war, so he was unable to save the Russians from military defeat. However the war taught him a valuable lesson in the form of an idea. This idea was reform. Alexander II realized through the humiliation that was suffered that if he ever wanted to have stability, as well as peace at home and to be honored abroad then military and domestic reforms needed to…

    • 2900 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every person in the world has a motive for something, whether for materialistic things or for survival purposes, people will always be motivated to do something to gain something. Alexander the Great was no different. He was raised by both his parents, however at times unbeknownst to him, his parents had motives of their own regarding what they wanted from Alexander. Additionally with his father’s background of military and “Hellenic Alliance” (Lane Fox, p.229) it is not hard to see that Alexander was immensely influenced by his father’s actions.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Alexander

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When his father was murdered Alexander was crowned king of the Macedonians. Among his first royal orders were to kill his cousin, two Macedonian princes and the general of his advance army. He took brutal measures to ensure his regency went uncontested. When news of these murders, including the king's, became public two separate revolts happened and Alexander, to his credit, put them both down peacefully but with the threat of force. He surrounded the Thessalian army in their sleep and they had no choice but to surrender or be massacred and the Athenians sued for peace the moment he arrived. It seems he kept his empire through fear not skillful ruling. Alexander then set out to quiet similar but smaller rebellions along his frontiers, Thebes an Athens again decided to revolt. The Athenians again backed down at a show of force but the Thebans fought and for that their entire city was burned to the ground.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics