Preview

How Did Montesquieu Influence The Constitution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
492 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Montesquieu Influence The Constitution
Montesquieu's ideology, especially from his renowned published The Spirits of the Law, greatly influenced the formation of the American Constitution. The philosophies which he brought forward into play evoke societies, especially those that were seeking to form new beginnings as a republic. Montesquieu seeks to look beyond the simple understanding of a law, to examine how a law is influenced by the society it was established for. Separation of powers is a necessity to guarantee liberty within a society, governed by separate bodies of individuals. Thus, it allows balance in the governmental bodies, so that attempts by one branch of government to interfere with liberty are deterred by the other branches. Continuing with the focus of separation …show more content…
American Colonists recognize the separation of powers as the primary guardian of liberty (Bergman, 1991). Even after two centuries of the well-renowned publication of The Spirits of Law, we still witness the workings of the concept of separation of powers in our republic. Furthermore, separation of powers continues to prove that a balance is needed to protect liberty and steer away from a despotism political system. The founding fathers of our nation took great pride in applying the concepts of Montesquieu’s to create a republic that guaranteed liberty for all. James Madison drew inspiration from the fact that separation of powers is a necessity to protect one’s liberty and to prevent tyranny from any branch of government seeking excessive power. Madison continues with the concept of not having a complete separation of powers, but that the power is unique to each branch of government framework. Thomas Jefferson and Adams were strongly passionate that virtue is essential for the republic to prosper. As Adams indicated in a letter to a friend lamenting the lack of republican virtue in the nation (Bergam,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Psy/270 Assignment 1

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The concepts of separation of powers and checks and balances were originally articulated by the French philosopher, Montesquieu. They then became a cornerstone in the political thinking of the English philosopher, John Locke. Locke in turn had a major impact on the writers of the US Constitution, who incorporated his ideas into that document. a. What is the key principle of the separation of powers? What value does it serve in the governance of democracies? b. What is the meaning of the concept of checks and balances? How do checks and balances help prevent tyrannical…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Baron de Montesquieu also touches on the definition of a democracy, drawing inspiration form the Roman structure, “the body of people is possessed of the supreme power.” In The Spirt of Laws he also touches on the fact that similarities to Roman punishments enlighten other governments similarities to that of Rome. John Locke also touches on this separation of powers labeling then differently in The Two Treaties of Civil Government labeling then as legislative, executive, and federative…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    t is safe to say that a respect for the principle of separation of powers is deeply ingrained in every American. The nation subscribes to the original premise of the framers of the Constitution that the way to safeguard against tyranny is to separate the powers of government among three branches so that each branch checks the other two. Even when this system thwarts the public will and paralyzes the processes of government, Americans have rallied to its defense.…

    • 325 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most important concerns of the argument presented by James Madison in The Federalist No. 41 & 45 is the possible misappropriation of power that the government has over the country. Madison stresses the importance of maintaining civil liberties and preventing the government from having too much power. The new government will be granted great influence over many aspects of life for the American citizen so there must be a system of checks and balances.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Madison wrote, “Liberty requires that the three great departments of power should be separate and distinct.” The three branches were called the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. All legislative powers were given to the Congress, which contained the Senate and House of Representatives. The executive powers were given to the President. The judicial decisions were made by judges within the Supreme Court (Doc B). The split of control allowed for each branch to be equal to the others. The three branches stopped the possibility of a tyranny of happening with a separation of powers. The definition of tyranny is that all the power is given to one person or group, which is the complete opposite of what was written in the…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Federalist Paper #47, James Madison explicates how one person or group withholding all the power is the definition of tyranny and that, “[L]iberty requires the three great departments of power should be separate and distinct.” The excerpt from the United States’ Constitution explain the different powers given to each branch of government. For instance, in Article 1, Section 1 it states, “All legislative power herein granted shall be vested in a Congress…” Moreover, the United States’ Constitution explains, “The executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States.” Additionally, the Constitution states, “The judicial power of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court and in such inferior courts….” Separation of Powers helps guard against tyranny because we prevent a singular branch from ruling over the people and have all the power, the very definition of tyranny. By separating the power of each branch it assures that no one branch overpowers…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalist 47- In this paper, Madison is responding to the issue of having a federal government. He argues against the assumption that this new government will be allotted too much power and control America as an empire. In response, Madison writes that the U.S Constitution balances the government well by using the system of separation of powers among the executive, judiciary, and legislature. Madison also stated that these powers would blend and intertwine; however that would not affect the factor of separation of power. To support his argument, Madison referred to the writings of Montesquieu. According to Montesquieu, tyranny results when one branch of government concurrently holds the powers of another branch. However, Madison argues that Montesquieu "did not mean that these departments ought to have no partial agency in, or no control over, the acts of each other." He interprets this as a system that supports checks and balances. Overall, he responds by stating his views on separation of power and by stating checks and balances has been followed in individual state constitutions before, so it should be trusted now.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most influential statesmen in the early republican period was James Madison. Madison was one of the patriots who wrote the Federalist Papers, which were responsible for the acceptance and eventual ratification of the Constitution of the United States. The papers brought up some of the main reasons why the Constitution ought to have been ratified, and many solutions to the evils that would potentially be faced by the United States. In his papers Madison drew attention especially to the concern of the tyranny of the majority and the possible solutions to his concern. He first considered where the problem stems with factions, but went on to look at solutions to the effect of factions because factions themselves were not his greatest…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the summer of 1787, fifty-five men representing twelve of the newly independent thirteen states gathered in Philadelphia and took on the challenge of framing a constitution that satisfied the people’s need for a tyranny-free government. Just coming out of a revolution and out from under the power of a king, the delegates were determined to create a government free of “the accumulation of all powers…in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many…”. Further reason that called for a new government was that the existing constitution, the Articles of Confederation, was not strong enough to hold this new nation together. It lacked an executive chief, a court system, and any sort of control over taxes on the states. Their challenge was this: create a government strong enough to support a new nation without digressing back to a tyranny in any form. James Madison’s ideas of separation of power became the starting line towards liberty. Our founding fathers constructed a constitution that guards against tyranny by creating separate powers between central government and state, legislative, judicial, and executive branches, and the House of Representatives and the Senate.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    INTRODUCTION Various types of governments such as Monarchy’s, Confederations, Oligarchy’s and even Dictatorships haven’t had the same successes as the United States Government. With both Democratic and Republic features the U.S Government created the first Constitutional Federal Republic. This has allowed the states to self-govern, and the power of the Country lies with the U.S Government. According to Cornell Law Schools Encyclopedia In order to restrict the Government from abusing its powers a “Political doctrine of constitutional law” known as the Separation of Powers, which separated the government into three branches (Executive, Legislative, and Judicial).…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stated by James Madison “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self appointed, or elective, may be justly pronounced the very definition of tyranny”. This quote means that these three powers should be separated or it could be considered tyrannical, and that is exactly what the constitution did. Separation of powers guards against tyranny by dividing the power of one central government into three branches of government separates the power to stop a figure from becoming too…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All powers, legislative, executive, judicial, are separate branches (Doc B). This is so one person or group cannot accumulate all of these powers and become an absolute ruler. The three separate branches can check on each other (Doc C). Since they are separate, they have different powers that can act against each other, assuring that one branch can’t always get their way. One branch can make a decision but might need another branch to approve it. For example, only Congress can make laws, but the president must approve them, in order for them to actually become a law. Separation of powers helps guard against tyranny, by making sure one group or individual can’t obtain enough power to become a supreme…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    James Madison argues how checks and balances can not only advocate a separation of powers but also create an effective government. Madison writes to help his readers understand how a well structured government can lead to a successful country. One of his main arguments is that no branch should have too much power, therefore, different branches of government should exist. "Legislative, judiciary magistracies should be drawn from the same fountain of authority, the people, through canals having no communication whatever with one another." To assure greater independence, government is separated into the Legislative Branch, the House of the Representatives and the Senate. He states "Ambition must be made to counteract ambition." meaning the ambitions of legislators must be checked by the executive and judicial branch which is then checked by the ambitions of legislators and presidents. This separation of powers advocated the idea of compromise. Madison also asserts that the members of each branch should not be too dependent on the members of the other two branches. If a man is presented with too much power, it may rule over him. Madison states "If men were angels, no government would be necessary. " The government must control the people but control itself as well. While the will of the people is no doubt the primary control on the government, other controls are necessary.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1787 our founding fathers gathered in the Pennsylvania State House in Philadelphia, in the exact same room our Declaration of Independence had been signed a few years prior. This group of men was faced with the immense task of drafting the Constitution of the United States of America. Our founding fathers showed such brilliant foresight in how they structured this foundational document by recognizing the need for a Constitution designed to keep our government regulated. We will be exploring different facets within the structure of the Constitution, looking closely at some of those regulations such as Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances. Through this exploration we will come to understand the importance of these aspects, why they are so…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Having a government that contains energy, stability and republican liberty might not seem that hard if one of these three ingredients are present, but if two or more are present in government it is where the difficulty begins. It is hard to fit all these three characteristics into one government because they do not blend together. Publius describes the need for energy and stability in the new government while at the same time maintaining the republican liberty. The 1787 Constitution achieves these through a separation of powers between the three branches of the federal government.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays