Preview

How Did Rome Contribute To The Conquest Of Rome?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
548 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Rome Contribute To The Conquest Of Rome?
Rome was very successfully during the most heroic period of her history, fought many battles during the Punic wars and they emerged out victorious while defeating her enemies in Spain, in Greece, in Africa and Asia minor and finally they were recognized and become the greatest power in the world while bringing all the defeated city states under her authority and control by creating a system in which in which she govern them but however it noticed her conquest exhibited many negative impacts up on her government and the conquered subjects.
At this time, the old the old Roman government (aristocracy) had passed away and Rome was a democratic Republic and all the thirty five tribes enrolled in to Roman Government were full citizens and had all the rights to vote with the exception of the of the Latin who were partially Roman citizens and could not hold office but under certain circumstances, they could vote and the Italian allies who were not Citizen and neither vote nor hold office ,this a lone was an indication of being oppressive since not equal opportunity was given to her subjects especially the conquered subjects yet they all contribute to the running the Government.(Morey,1901)
…show more content…
Initially every full Roman citizen was eligible to elected offices of curule but the so called the noble families could bribe using the wealth they possessed to influence the elections in order to retain these offices and therefore by their conquest, she become greedy to love power. (Morey,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Evaluate how future changes in economical political, legal and social factors, may impact on the strategy of a specified organisation.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    CCOT Rome

    • 509 Words
    • 2 Pages

    From its founding in the eighth century BCE to its western collapse in 476 CE, Rome’s governmental structure changed considerably. After a brief period of monarchy, the Roman Republic was established. The republic rules for several centuries, ruling by the voice of the people. Senators represented the interested of Roman citizens. However, with the reign of Caesar, this changed. Rome became an empire ruled by a single emperor. His dictatorial rule was imposed upon the people without their consent, starkly different from the elected representatives of the republican era. Later, Diocletian decided to split the empire, causing two separate political entities to develop; the Western and Eastern Roman Empires. This destroyed Rome’s original unified imperial structure and gave it a more regional character. The strength of the bold empire was lost. Also, Roman political attitudes toward religion changed during its history. Traditionally, Rome was pagan, with most worshipping a polytheistic religion sponsored by the state. Later, Emperor Constantine converted to Christianity, and Rome became a Christian empire. This was much different from the pagan beliefs of long ago. In addition, women gained a few rights during the imperial era, granted by politicians in the government. They had more commercial rights and freedoms than their republican predecessors.…

    • 509 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Caesar Dbq

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Seeing as Rome had a new Democratic government, not one individual could rule. However, they still had votes on who to elect for government and for the contestants it was big competition. According to Document A “Life of Caesar” by Plutarch, even the competition for smaller, miserable-looking communities was tough. This is because there is always “jealous…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome started out as a small city-state in western Italy. Carthage on the other hand was already a huge empire. They ruled most of Spain and the northeastern part of Africa. The first Punic War was started over the control of Sicily and a few other minor islands just of the cost of Italy. Carthage was in control of part of Sicily at the time when Rome decided that they wanted the little island.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By 200 BC, Rome was quickly becoming one of the world’s greatest empires with their excellent military conquering territory from modern day Scotland to Spain. After the Punic Wars and the defeat of Carthage, Rome had full control of the Mediterranean region, establishing colonies in North Africa, Egypt, the Middle East, and Asia Minor. Julius Caesar became Rome’s first emperor using his military influence. Under his reign, Rome shifted from a republic to an empire under the rule of an emperor and the military. Rome steadily increased in stability, power, and wealth, reaching Pax Romana (the time of Roman peace) under Emperor Augustus Caesar. Rome was forced to discover, as many other large empires throughout history have, that size can create complications. Political strains developed and Rome eventually morphed into a government similar to a dictatorship. Believing their goal of a “perfect empire” had been reached, leaders in Rome began to become lazy. Romans developed a thirst for luxury and a lack of work ethic, which resulted in a decline in the quality of products made by the empire. Around the 5th century BC, Rome began to have constant invasion attempts by Germanic tribes at their borders. There was a multitude of factors contributing to the fall of Rome, the most impactful being the frequently changing leadership, the increasing negligence of the Roman army, and foreign invasions along Rome’s borders.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Did Sparta Change

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As the age of the Greeks was coming to an end, a small kingdom in central Italy was gaining power and growing. During this time, Rome was not yet the Rome as we know it today. In 753 BCE the Kingdom of Rome was founded on a hill top right next to the Tiber River. This kingdom lasted for around 200 years until in 509 BCE when the people of Rome overthrew the king and created a republic. Like the Athenians, the Romans also showed pride in their participation in government. However unlike the Athenians the Romans set up a republic in which the people of Rome voted for representatives and those reps then discussed, voted and participated in the government. This in turn meant that political participation in Rome was less direct than it had been in their Greek counterparts but, this in no way stopped the Romans from participation in politics. The Romans believed in one very important virtue. This virtue was called gravitas and it represented the Roman’s seriousness and importance it put toward aspects of life, one of which was politics. The Romans felt that being involved in government was a civil duty that all Romans must know about it. The people of Rome felt this way because they did not want to revert back to the time when they were ruled by kings. Unfortunately the era of the republic began to fall as a cycle of violence ensued. Rome was in constant chaos at this time and as shown throughout…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government that Rome had was an Empire, that means the emperor decides what to do to the people, the law, or anything that makes him pleased but won't cause a crisis. When Rome became an empire, it meant that Rome had dynasties or states under a single ruler, usually an emperor or empress. After the fall of the Roman Republic, their emerged Rome's absolute ruler named Augustus, or Octavian. At that time, the Romans wanted to recover their great republic, and Octavian had told them he would restore the power of the Senates and the Roman people, but at that time, Octavian already was the emperor in complete control. Roman emperors had a role in Rome's daily life as well.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Imperial Rome’s political control was mainly based on social status. For instance wealthy men dominated over women, and poor men. They had a written code of law that offered plebeians (poorer class) protection from abuse. This gave the plebeians an opportunity to shape public policy. Romans took great pride in this, and believed they enjoyed greater freedom than most of their neighbors. They had a rule of law, the rights of citizens, the absences of pretension, upright moral behavior, and keeping ones word. This was later recognized as “the way of the ancestors.”…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of the most notable reasons for the political corruption of Rome was the loss of public system for electing emperor. For instance, "The choice was always open to debate between the old emperor, the Senate, the Praetorian Guard, and the army"(Fall of the Roman Empire). Rome never followed an effective system to determine the election of new emperors. They just choose the new emperor by their current wishes. Little by little, the Praetorian Guard took over the complete jurisdiction of choosing the new emperor. Greedy Praetorian Guard only considered their good. By the 186 A. D, they began to sell throne to the bidder who would pay the most. They didn 't care about whether the bidder had the ability to lead or not and they ignored the development of the whole Rome. They just wanted to gain money and keep wealthy. It threatened the stability and the safety of Rome with crippling central authority. The centrifugal force overflowed among Romans and it was difficult for ethnic harmony and national unity. It rendered that Romans lack the sense of security and the determination of defending the country deep down in their heart. The Rome gradually lost popular support. During the next 100 years, Rome was characterized by turbulence and intranquility since there were 37 emperors once dominated Rome for a while. Too much power seized by emperor made more and more Romans…

    • 1910 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The success of the Romans started with their organization within the city. Almost all citizens could vote, and after plebeians were allowed to hold office, almost anybody could be appointed to the Senate and other governmental positions. Voting created a pride in the city, as every person held a stake in the city. It created a sprit that could be seen on the battlefield. Voting also allowed for merit…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman Republic was the major stronghold for centuries. Encompassing the Mediterranean and much of Europe, and even having influence throughout Egypt and beyond, it was well understood that Rome was not to be messed with. No civilization could ever topple such a well-organized and technologically advanced society such as Rome. No civilization, that is, other than its own self. Pride, revenge, and greed influenced key decisions that pried at the few loose ends that Rome had. Generals, soldiers, and the Senate alike destroyed the foundations on which the Roman Republic was built on, and the nation collapsed from the inside out. In a perfect world, Rome had an…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nine eleven paper

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Romans political power was extremely in need of assistance. Being part of the government in Rome was seen as a punishment instead of a reward. Government officials were mostly assassinated or committed suicide (Document A). There were also many civil wars, which led to the division of the empires. Rome was politically corrupt and couldn’t be fixed.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Night is a work by Elie Wiesel about his experience with his father in the Nazi Germany concentration camps at Auschwitz and Buchenwald in 1944–1945 (Night book.). Elie became motivated to write this novel because he felt he was obligated to share the gruesome experiences felt by Jews during that time period. Many scholars agree that “Elie Wiesel wrote the book "Night" as a memoir of his experiences as a Jew during the Holocaust. He calls himself a "messenger of the dead among the living" through his literary witness” (Why did Elie Wiesel write the book night?). This proves that he felt responsible to address this experience and make certain that the genocide that stripped him of his identity and childhood…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    How Did Rome Fall?

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The fall of the Roman Empire is a controversial topic that has been debated by historians for centuries. Popular speculations about the infamous fall vary from the Empire being too great a size to be properly controlled by a single government to theories contemplating that Rome hadn’t fallen at all. Even today, many wonder exactly how one of the most influential civilizations in the history of the world crumbled after existing for more than half a millennium. There are many different opinions and explanations regarding this question; yet in order to understand how the Roman Empire fell, it is essential to know how it rose.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the United States today the government tries to interfere in private lives. There should be no more laws made letting the government interfere in the private lives of people and if there are, people should stand up against this invasion in people’s privacy and sat no. Should the government have the right to interfere in people’s private lives? Does being a part of a representative democracy mean that people can give up their freedom to make their own choices to benefit other people?…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays