Preview

How Did Slavery Influence The Drafting Of The Constitution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
593 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Slavery Influence The Drafting Of The Constitution
Following the failure of the first attempt at governing the new independent country, the United States, delegates of the Constitutional Convention, including people such as George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, and James Madison, took it upon themselves to completely scrap the Articles of Confederation and begin drafting a new constitution from 1787 to 1800. This later became the American Constitution, a complete revision of the power of the government, representation of states, interstate commerce and foreign trade, and issues revolving around slavery. Although slavery isn’t directly stated into the newly drafted constitution, African American and American Indian slaves influenced the drafting of the constitution through compromise between the Northern and Southern states on issues relating to politics and economics. …show more content…
As a consequence of 25 of the 55 convention delegates being slave owners, whether or not slaves should be counted into the state population was up for debate. Following the Great Compromise, the three-fifths compromise was created in order to allow southern states to count each enslaved individual as three-fifths of a person. This extra boost in population gave states such as Virginia, South Carolina, and North Carolina - where a large percentage of their population was slaves - more representation in the House of Representatives so that neither the northern or southern states fully got their way. Another indirect compromise between the Southern and Northern states and the framers of the constitution was the agreement to not allow the word “slave” to be written directly into the constitution. The inclusion of slavery into their constitution would be contradictory to their political ideas of the American Revolution of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Slaves where there were exceptions with the wealthiest slave nation in the Americas, men tended to field work and women worked on the cotton gin. There is a new idea of the role of men and women and the relationship between black and white men. The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 made sure that new states developed in the west would be able to claim full statehood once their population reached the lowest population of older states. Jefferson, American Founding Father wanted to spread ideas around with the opposition of the continuity of the republic. The three fifth's compromise in 1787 determined that each slave should be counted as three-fifths of a person for the purpose of taxation and representation in the state. This agreement allowed unequal…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This led to the discussion of constructing a stronger central government that could have the ability to provide stability to states during times of rebellion. The US Constitution was drafted after a great deal of compromises on the issues of states representation, direct election, and slavery. The final version created a central government that would have a bimodal legislature, with the senate having equal representation elected from state legislatures and the house having proportional representation elected directly from the people. On the issue of slavery, slaves for the purposes of state representation in the house were considered three-fifths of a white man and importation of new slaves would continue in America for a minimum of another 20 years. In order to give support for ratifying the new Constitution, the federalist, people that supported the new Constitution, promised and later pass a Bill of Rights that protected the rights of US citizens from government…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the founding fathers drafted the Constitution of the United States of America, the convention became divided over the continuation of slavery within the nation. Northern delegates, who already detested the institution on moral grounds, were further opposed to it due to added concessions to southern states (Document 1). One concession allowed for slaves to be counted as three-fifths of a person for representational purposes, and therefore gave the South an advantage in the House of Representatives, which assigned number of votes based on size of population. From the southern perspective these concession were necessary to preserve an economic system they were completely dependent on. Southern delegates went so far as to concede control on commercial regulation in exchange for the protection of slavery. The threat of southern delegates abandoning the convention forced northerners to compromise on this issue in order to ratify the Constitution. While the delegate’s compromise established initial unity between the North and South, it set out a precedent for sectional concessions, which became increasingly intolerable to the other side. Increased sectional tensions eventually resulted in southern secession.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are three reasons why slaves should count in the new Constitution. First of all, it was stated that they should be counted in votes because they were property. Another statement suggested that much of the population in the south was made up of slaves so it wouldn't make sense not to count their votes. Last of all, it was stated that the north would acquire more representatives if they sided with not counting slaves and would have the power to end slavery. In conclusion, there are three main reason as to why slaves should count.…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The constitution was an unclear document on the issue of slavery which caused sectional discord. There was no direct address on the topic of slavery, and this opened up the opportunity for the north and the south to interpret slavery in whatever way it benefitted them the most. After expansion began to occur it was a disputed topic on whether territories were able to have slavery or not. The Compromise of 1850 somewhat made the situation clearer by stating which territories could and could not have slavery, but popular sovereignty made this compromise not as useful because pro and against slave populations moved into the territory just to declare slave or slave free. Although the compromise stated where slavery was allowed it did not help clarify who or what could be consider a slave because the constitution says “we” and is not really clear who is a part of “we”. (Americans 82 89) The article “Plain Words for the North” demonstrates how the people who wrote and drafted the constitution did not believe that not addressing slavery would turn into such a big controversy, by stating, “Flagrant violations of the plainest rules of right and wrong were committed.” The constitution was written by White Northerners which is one of the reasons for argument.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Constitutional Convention, James Madison and his fellow delegates were trying to write a new document known as the Constitution, which would change the way the government would run for the future years of the nation. There were fifty-five white male individuals that joined the call for a Constitutional Convention in the town of Philadelphia in May of 1787. While gathered, the members found multiple problems with their current constitution, known as the Articles of Confederation. These problems included not having a chief executive, a court system, and the central government was very weak and limited. The members agreed to create a new constitution, to make the central government stronger, but try not to create a tyranny, like the harsh power of King George III.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Constitution was ratified in 1787 to make a stronger and better central government. Although it was hard to get it ratified, especially in the southern states, it was meant to keep the country together and to be the extreme law of the land. This document, although nearly perfect, did not mention slavery at all, as William Lloyd Garrison states in document B. This, to some extent, caused the nation to rip apart, but it was not the only thing that did. Although some people believe that the constitution caused disunity among the union it was not the constitution itself, but many different factors like the compact theory and slavery which angered either the north or the south.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Delegates from the South, though, (where slavery was much more common) wanted to count the slaves as well, as this would give them more power in Congress.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the spring of 1787, fifty-five men representing twelve states traveled to Philadelphia to participate in drafting a new constitution. During the final days of the convention, in the month of August, the issue of slavery came up.…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Three-Fifth clause is a compromise that said for every five slaves, three of them would count towards the state’s population. The Three-Fifth clause conference was held at the United States Constitutional Convention in the year 1787 and was enforced in states that allowed slavery. The reason for the Three-Fifth clause is because the states had to figure out a system of representation and didn’t know how to count the slaves. The Northern states didn’t want the slaves to be counted towards the population because the slaves were seen as property in the Southern states and the Northern states were concerned that if the Southern states had too many representatives, they would be able to out vote the North on many issues including slavery and…

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The compromise agreed to count 3/5 of the slaves as part of the state's population.…

    • 4193 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This became apparent when the Second Continental Congress met to create the Articles of Confederation. The question of slavery drags on and leads to disastrous implications in the future.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, the 3/5 Compromise was introduced in 1787 when the Constitution was up for ratification. The 3/5 Compromise stated that three- fifths of the slave population in each state to be counted for congressional representation. This was important to the southern states because a great majority of their population was slaves. The compromise gave the South more votes in the House of Representatives and in the Electoral College. The compromise was added because southern states such as South Carolina and Georgia threatened secession. Second, popular sovereignty became a popular way of solving the slavery issue in new states and territories. Popular sovereignty meant that the citizens in each state or territory would vote to determine if that state or territory would allow slavery or not. This idea was made famous by Stephen A Douglas, Senator from IL, who believed that democracy would solve the slavery issue. Popular sovereignty was used in the Compromise of 1850 by allowing the citizens in the newly formed territories of Utah and New Mexico to decide if slavery would be allowed or not (Doc…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the question of slavery became more prominent, Congress became more evasive on whether to declare their new territory as pro or anti-slave states. This lead to many disputes between the anti-slavery North and the pro-slavery South. It was such a big controversy because population size determines the number of representatives in the House of Representatives. This means that if the new territory, shown in Doc A, becomes pro-slavery then the amount of pro-slavery representatives would outnumber the anti-slavery representatives in the House of Representatives, which the North was extremely against. Congress ultimately decided to use a process called popular sovereignty which let the inhabitants of the new territory choose for themselves whether to be free or slave to make it fairer. Yet the North still greatly opposed this because, as Doc B states, the new territory was closer to the South and would be inhabited by primarily Southerners so they would still choose to allow slavery, upsetting the balance between free and slave states. Thus, by not outlining clear rules for new land the Constitution created a divide between the Northern and Southern states over slavery that ultimately lead to the beginning of the Civil…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three-Fifths Compromise

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The ratification of the United States Constitution depended on the agreement of the North and the South, and the issue of slavery was a major obstruction to this agreement. Each state’s representation was determined by the number of person’s residing in that state. The North did not want to count the slaves as part of this number because it would mean less representation for them in the government. Their argument was that since slaves were considered property, they should be equated with other chattel property, like cattle and mules. The South, on the other hand, was determined to count slaves into their population due to the high proportion of slaves in the southern region of the country. Without the support of the South, the ratification of the Constitution was doubtful, so the 3/5 Compromise was written. Article 1, section 2 of the Constitution states that “population for the purposes of representation and taxation would be determined by adding the whole number of free people, including indentured servants, plus 3/5 of all slaves”. This was also called The Enumeration Clause.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays