Preview

How Did The Russian Revolution Affect Society

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
890 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did The Russian Revolution Affect Society
People in Russia during the Russian Revolution and the government’s power and influence had changed how people viewed others and society. The effect of the Russian Revolution after it has ended had consequences for the people under the rule of the government. The people life’s had been changed because of the style of government that had been running Russia.
After the Russian Revolution had ended Lenin had quickly gained control of the city council of Saint Petersburg, which is the capital of Russia. Lenin’s slogan to the people was, “Peace, Land, and Bread” (Beck) which had been majorly supported. Lenin and his followers had started to take over government offices. The Bolsheviks, followers of Lenin, had overpowered the government in just
…show more content…
Lenin had wanted to be able to have Russia thrive again because of production of industrialization had decreased, workers of great skill had left Russia to start up again in a new country, and trade was at a pause. Lenin had always used a form of Communism to control the state, but now with the economy the way it was, the NEP(New Economic Policy) had been a form of capitalism, but at a small account. The way this policy worked is that instead of giving the extra amount of crops grown, the peasants could be able to sell it instead. Small businesses, factories, and farms had been in charge of the actual owner. By the end of 1928 this policy had worked and the recovering of the country had increased in products, and eventually Russia had been in good status in their economy. In 1922, the USSR (Union of Social Soviet Republics) which had been created to glorify and show recognition toward the Bolshevik Revolution. In this same year, Lenin had gone through a stroke, and had died in 1924. The two people that had been fighting for power once Lenin is gone is Joseph Stalin and Leon Trotsky. Lenin had a feeling in his gut of Stalin being a threatening and deadly man. Before long, Lenin had said, “Comrade Stalin . . . has concentrated enormous power in his hands, and I am not sure that he always knows how to use that power with sufficient caution.” This had showed how even Lenin being a Communist, knew that if Stalin

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Over the period from 1855 to 1964, Russia saw various reforms and policies under the Tsars and the Communist leaders that had great impacts on its economy and society both positive and negative. Lenin definitely implanted polices that changed society and the economy for example with war communism. However whether his policies had the greatest impact is debatable and in this essay I will be assessing the view whether Lenin had the greatest impact on Russia’s economy and society than any other ruler between the period from 1855-1964.…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1922, when Vladimir Lenin died, someone needed to step up and the Soviet Union. As he was slowly dying, a power struggle emerged between Leon Trotsky, and Joseph Stalin. Even though Trotsky “had been widely viewed as the heir of Lenin, it was relatively easy for Stalin to combine with the other Bolshevik leaders in order to head off this threat” (Paley 10). In Lenin’s “Final Testament”, Lenin could already see that Stalin was quickly and surreptitiously gaining power. Stalin’s position of General Secretary gave him the ability to appoint people to important positions. Lenin was also reluctant to see Stalin as his successor because he thought that Trotsky could do a much better job. Lenin believed that Trotsky was the best man in the central…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Also, in 1924, Stalin wanted to keep the NEP going, even though it went against Marxism as the NEP meant that a mixed economy in which there were features of capitalism. The main reason Stalin did this was because it was a measure brought in by Lenin, and at the time, Stalin wished to make himself seem as loyal to Lenin as possible, to appear to be the natural heir.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The 1917 Bolshevik Revolution was the seizure of power by the radical Marxists led by Vladimir Lenin and was one of the pivotal moments of the 20th Century. The ramifications of the event, and the subsequent establishment of the world's first Communist regime were immediately obvious, but also had continuing repercussions for decades. This essay will argue that although Lenin and Stalin seemed to have conflicting views, in reality they shared very similar policies; Stalin just took these policies to an extreme.…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin Dbq

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1917, Russia was crumbling into pieces. The World War I was draining all of Russia’s resources. There was shortage of food throughout the country, which left people starving. At the battlefront, millions of Russian soldiers were dying, they did not possess many of the powerful weapons that their opponents had. The government under Czar Nicholas II was disintegrating, and a provisional government had been set up. In November of 1917, Lenin and his communist followers known as the Bolsheviks overthrew the provisional government and set a communist government in Russia. However, in 1924, Lenin died and Josef Stalin assumed leadership of the Soviet Union, which was the name for the communist Russia. Stalin was a ruthless leader who brought many changes to the Soviet Union. Stalin’s goal was to transform the Soviet Union into a modern superpower and spread communism throughout the world, and he was determined to sabotage anyone who stood in his way. He used many methods such as collectivization, totalitarianism and five year plan’s to achieve his goals. Stalin’s rule brought both harmful and beneficial consequences to the Soviet Union; however, the negative factors were so terrible, that they overwhelm the positive factors.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1800 and 1939 Russia underwent through a severe regime change. The people of Russia were in a state of great economic disparity, and the lower class faced hunger, poverty, etc. The lower class had very little of the grain, land, and fiscal control that was available in Russia, such pretext of large income disparity gaps and unbalanced control of GDP were the pre-requisites se in place for the takeover of socialism. And such is what happened. Within this time period Russia went through a proletariat revolution of communism aiming have the workers of the world unite and free themselves from capitalist oppression to create a world run by and for the working class. However even though they underwent this major social-economic change, conditions in Russia stayed around the same. We still saw that Russia was under leadership of a Totalitarian authority. And maintained the same economic conditions where the consumer-based market never developed and the population was largely rural and the economy was agricultural based.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lenin a Red Tsar?

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Lenin went on to say that based on the disproportion between economic development of the monopoly stage, which is the beginning of full socialism, and capitalism, which is the meaning of a private life and freedom from others. The only problem with that theory is that a Monopoly and Capitalism are complete opposites of each other, and were bound to cause problems. Lenin knew of this problem, but considered it a stepping stone in the right direction. He predicted problems, but thought in due time his economic machine would operate with great success, and make Russia into a world mega power. Lenin’s plan of communism for Russia was supposed to be great. People were supposed to get free education, free medical care, everybody makes the same amount of money, working equally as hard, and everybody was supposed to get the same advantage in life.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Vladimir Lenin was a Bolshevik Leader for the 1917 October Revolution, and the first Head of State for the Soviet Union. His contribution to political science, Leninism, was developed from his interpretations on the Marxist theory. After the revolution, Lenin headed the new Soviet government that formed in Russia. He became the leader of the USSR upon its founding in 1922. Lenin held the highest post in the Soviet government until his death in 1924.…

    • 5832 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American Revolution resulted in a representative government. The Senate, House of Representatives, and the Office of the President were made up of elected officials, giving the people a way to influence change in government. However, a liberal provisional government took control of Russia after Nicholas II abdicated. Another body, the Petrograd Soviet of Workers' and Soldiers' Deputies, wanted more radical change in Russia. Some members were socialists called Mensheviks, while another group of radical socialists were called the Bolsheviks. The socialists called for peace, while the provisional government continued to war. Lenin emerged as the leader of the Bolsheviks, and in 1917 he went to Russia calling for "peace, land and bread." Lenin was a Marxist and wanted to train the working class to become a revolutionary force. On November 7, 1917, the Bolsheviks overthrew the provisional government in what is called the October Revolution. In 1918, the Bolsheviks renamed themselves the Communist Party. After the war with the Whites, the Communists renamed the lands they ruled to the Soviet Union.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Remember, Lenin had taken land from wealthy landowners and had given the peasants their own small farms. In 1928, Stalin announced that all family farms would be abolished. They would be replaced by collective farms, or large farms worked by hundreds of families. The government expected that these collective farms, with the help of modern technology, would produce more food with fewer workers. The members of the collective farm worked the land together. They owned the machinery together. They divided what the collective farm produced according to the work each had done. The Communists liked the collective farms. The government could control the peasants better on collectives than on millions of small farms. The Communists also thought the family farms were too small and poor to use machinery. On the collective farms people were supposed to have tractors and machines. Fewer people could do more work and produce more food. This would free up people to work in the new mines and…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the soldiers pillaged the towns, the people had no more belonging or money and so poverty became an even larger problem in Russia. Throughout these events, the people had no say and no way to change their position. Their rights were stripped from them and the common people were forced to live as slaves for the bolshevik party. During the Russian Revolution, there was a great amount change. The Leadership and the ideas and goals of the country changed but the issues and rights of the common people did…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    During 1917 the political system of Russia, and the political opinions of its public, began to change. The First World War was deeply taking its toll, with the casualties running into millions, and food shortages were reaching crisis levels across Russia. Presided over by the Provisional Government, who had little support and even less real power, the people of Russia became restless. In October, the animosity between Government and populace came to a head, and a revolution put Lenin’s socialist Bolshevik party in power. This essay will show that, while the Bolshevik party was dedicated and driven in the values they believed in, it was only the seizing of opportunity, and a lot of luck, that they succeeded in taking power.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the 1930's the Soviet Union found itself in a incredibly difficult position. Following Lenin's death in 1925 Stalin was able to consolidate his power base and break with Kamenev and Zinoviev. And by then end of the decade he emerged as the supreme leader. In 1928 Stalin introduces his first Five-Year Plan, the “revolution from above” to help develop the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union had fallen behind, Stalin remarked, “We are fifty to one-hundred years behind the advanced countries....…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just like Hitler, Lenin used terror to maintain and strengthen the state. His individual influence that appealed to the masses not only encourage people to follow his lead, but also allowed the bolsheviks to take control of the country. Lenin gained and maintained power by destroying opposing sides and engaging with the lower class of Russia. By persuading a substantial amount of the Russian population, with their mindset of craving equality, Lenin gained support in large numbers while maintaining his role as a pivotal leader. Unlike Tsar Nicholas II, Lenin was eager to lead and with his ideology of equality and communism his attraction was inevitable. Although Lenin did not fulfill every citizens hopes and dreams, his strive to give minorities a better quality life helped him gain the support he needed to maintain power: “Peace, land, Bread.” After finally negotiating peace with Germany- Treaty of…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adolf Hitler (Germany)

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Leader and founder of the Bolshevik division of the Russian Communist Party, Lenin seized power in Russia during the October Revolution of 1917, thanks partly to the actions of others. He then led the country through civil war, starting a regime called “War Communism” to deal…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays