Preview

How Did The US Constitution Interpret The Language Of The Constitution?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
526 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did The US Constitution Interpret The Language Of The Constitution?
Even though the Constitution was drafted by exceptional men with divine help from Heavenly Father, people of all ages have interpreted the language of the Constitution differently than others. This difficulty caused many different groups to form their own opinion on what they thought the Constitution was saying. This was especially evident when our country was first formed and during the Civil War.

It all started with the Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist campaign in the 1790’s. (John Adams and Jefferson) were running for president. The Federalists wanted a strong central government with more power than what they had at that time. The Anti-Federalists were the exact opposite. They wanted a small central government with minimal power, that gave most of the power to the states. These two ideas would then become the main topics of debate for future government campaigns. It would also affect some critical situations in the 1850’s, such as the Mormon Saints in Missouri and the conterserary of slavery.
…show more content…
Because of this, they forced the leadership of the church to sign a document that would force the Saints to leave Missouri. Even though the Saints tried defending themselves, they were still forced out of their land and forced to flee to Illinois. Joseph Smith and other leaders of the church petitioned to the federal government about the unlawful expulsion, but since there was not an amendment in place at this time that could have the government help the Saints, all the President could say was, “I’ll lose the vote of state of Missouri if I help

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Throughout the early days of the United States of America, when the nation was beginning to take structural form, the power of the national government increased greatly. Much of this is due to the Federalist ideas present by our first President George Washington, and other prominent founding fathers such as Alexander Hamilton and John Jay. The Federalist position, which supported a strong central government favoring power to the national or federal government, was very prominent in the early days, however it was not unopposed. With the growing power of the national government, those known as Anti-Federalists entered the picture. Anti-Federalists favored power to the states, and sought a weak central government in order to ensure the right of individuals in the nation. Later Anti-Federalists formed the Democratic-Republican Party headed by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. It was through the actions of the members of the Democratic-Republicans, through events including The Whiskey Rebellion of 1794, and the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions of 1798, that they were effective in decreasing the size of the federal government, ensuring individual rights to the people of the U.S. and stealing power away from the Federalist Party.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the State of Missouri Staff, the Old Settlers took this as a good excuse to take the “law into their own hands.” Since the Old Settlers were supporters of slavery, they feared what might happen if their slaves heard about the Mormons and got ideas about freedom and equality. They did not want to face the retaliation of their slaves. In addition, with the missionary efforts of the Mormons on the Native Americans, the Old Settlers feared what might happen if the Mormons grew mad at them and decided to use the Natives against them. This constant flow of fear only increased as more Mormons showed up.…

    • 1732 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “How did the Federalists and the Antifederalists differ in their visions for what the federal government should be? The American Revolution ended in 1783. Along with the war, as in any war, a large debt has been incurred. Other issues stymying the newly independent confederation government were relationships with the Indians and the western settlements and trade development and monetary values.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson’s (president through 1801-09) political party, the Jeffersonian Republicans, believed in a strict interpretation of the Constitution, while Jefferson’s opposing party, the Federalists, believed in a loose interpretation of the Constitution. In order to comprehend the clear distinction between the two parties it is imperative to analyze the events during Thomas Jefferson’s presidency and James Madison’s presidency. The Democratic Republican Party solidified their values in various instances: James Madison’s letter to Congress, the resolutions of the Hartford convention, and Jefferson’s letter regarding religious freedom. Likewise, the Federalist Party upheld to their values when they created a national bank and to an extent when Jefferson criticized the federalist Parties values. However, both parties contradict their values many times. The Democratic Republican Party contradicted their strict approach, when Jefferson imposed the Embargo Act (creating many political cartoons emphasizing the hypocritical Democratic Republicans), the Louisiana Purchase, criticism from own party members, and controversial and contradicting views by Thomas Jefferson. Similarly the Federalist Party contradicts their own party values when they criticized the vague conscription bill of the Democratic Republicans. Even though the Federalist Party followed their loose values to an extent, while the Democratic Republican Party followed their strict values to an extent, both of the parties became hypocritical and contradicted their values for personal party gain.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is evident in the design of the Constitution itself. It is clear to see that it was the framers’ intention to create a Constitution that is purposefully vague, as James Madison states the reasoning behind the document’s language in Federalist #37. Madison states, “All new laws, though penned with the greatest technical skill and passed on the fullest and most mature deliberation, are considered as more or less obscure and equivocal, until their meaning be liquidated and ascertained by a series of particular discussions and adjudications.” This means that Madison believed that all laws, although written with deliberation, are purposefully kept ambiguous until the meaning is discussed by a group. It is very likely that he believed that the Constitution, the supreme law of the country, should be written the same way.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution was written a little over 225 years ago. The authors had the best in mind when penning it, but with changes in time come changes in culture.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constitution Controversy

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the 1850's, there was much controversy and tension over the constitution between the states and the people. It did contribute to the failure of the union because of the different interpretations of the constitution, the conflictions of other documents, and tensions of the states and people.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States of America is a shining example of a country that is rooted in the principle of liberty. Liberty is the power to act as one pleases free from the restrictions of others. Liberty is the ultimate principle which Americans must adhere to. However, the United states has fallen away from its founding principles over time. It is losing the spirit of its founding.…

    • 1610 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    After declaring our country is free from Great Britain, our founding fathers wanted to create a democracy based government where tyranny would essentially be diminished. The founding fathers soon find themselves agree to disagree, divided in different opinion on how the government should be created, so they separated themselves into two political groups: the Federalist and the Antifederalist. The Federalist Party believed in a strong central government. According to the Federalist point of view, the government should be powerful enough to provide protection against external and internal threats but also is limited enough to prevent tyranny. The Antifederalist favored a strong state government and a weak national government. The Antifederalist was also opponents of the constitution proposed at the American Constitution Convention of 1787. They opposed the Constitution because they thought the constitution would give the country an entirely new and untested form of government. The fact that our Constitution is still effective function after two hundred years has proven that the Federalist’s beliefs are what is best for the people of the United States. The Articles of Confederations, the Supremacy Clause, and the Fourteen Amendment are some of the few tenets that provide the best examples of why the Federalist is a better party for the people of the United States than the Antifederalist.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Ever since its inception, one of the High Court’s primary duties has been to interpret the Australian Constitution. There have been many methodologies used to do so and many schools of thought (have been adopted by different judges) in approximately the last hundred years, but so far there still isn’t one consistent and cohesive way of interpretation . In this essay three types of options or methodologies that have been more commonly used by High Court judges will be discussed. They include: literalism/legalism, originalism and progressivism. Other options that may be considered by the High Court will also be examined in this paper.…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution of the United States is one of the pivotal documents in history. Besides the mere fact that it is, largely, an embodiment of the ideals promulgated during the enlightenment, it represents the hopes, dreams, and ideals of many people from countless generations before us. It is the culmination of decades and centuries of controversial and untested ideas and theories. It was, at its very core, a shot in the dark, a hope against all hopes.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalists Advantages

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Federalists had several advantages in promoting the Constitution over the anti-federalists. The Federalists were for the Constitution because they wanted a more conservative government, where as the anti-federalists were against it because they didn't want the government to be in control of everything.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution should be interpreted based on the current times and events. The interpretation of the Constitution in the past was unlawful in so many ways. There are still unratified amendments pending right now because they are unconstitutional. The method of interpretation might frame how political elites and the public at large view the court’s decision, as well as influence the court’s ability to avoid charges of judicial activism (Nardi, Jr., 2014). There were a lot of Jim Crow laws that prohibited minorities and women from exercising certain rights. The Constitution was not intended to remedy future issues and problems. Therefore, it should be interpreted based on current events and used as a guide to prevent unethical laws and…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Their backgrounds might explain the reasons behind their differing points of view because federalists were people with money and there were very few of them during this time and believed that they could benefit from a strong central government. On the other hand, anti-federalists favored a weak central government because they were the farmers and slave owners that feared that a government with too much power would reflect a monarchy…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The argument that ensued between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists might have ended many years ago, but their philosophical ideals shaped the foundation of our beliefs as a country. These beliefs can be whittled down to two men named Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. Both men fought assertively for a government based on their ideas, believing that their respective ideals would create an outstanding government. Hamilton, like the Federalists, valued a stronger national government, opposite of that which Jefferson believed in. Hamilton also spent many years of his life advocating for the Constitution and for federalism. He even favored the creation of a national bank that would control the U.S. currency,…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays