Preview

How Does Antony Use Ethos In Julius Caesar

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
156 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Does Antony Use Ethos In Julius Caesar
In the script Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the characters Antony and Brutus both give the roman citizens a speech. The purpose of the speech is to persuade the citizens to “elect” who is going to be the new leader of Rome. Antony and Brutus both are genuinely strong at manipulating the citizens of Rome. Antony uses pathos and Brutus uses logos, but the speech that had the best effect was Antony’s. Antony was furtively trying to convince the people that Brutus was wrong and Caesar did not deserve to die. Brutus enters the forum with a crowd of plebeians. He then takes action and tells the audience that he is a extremely honorable man and that they can trust that. He explains to them that he did not kill Caesar because of lack of love,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Robber Barons was the negative term for the titans of industry or, as Professor Donald Miller calls them, the capitalist conquistadors. These were the guys like Andrew Carnegie, Cornelius Vanderbilt, Gustavus Swift, Philip Armour, John D. Rockefeller and others who rose to the top and ran monopolies or near-monopolies in the Gilded Age (1870s-1900ish). They were seen as bad because they employed ruthless methods to run competion out of the market, but on the other hand, weren't breaking any laws or rules in this laissez faire timeperiod. These guys also gave a lot of money away: Carnegie built tons of libraries, and Carnegie Mellon University got a lot from him,…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Literature naturally comes to mind as a rich resource for the study of persuasion. To persuade someone completely, one must use rhetorical devices to overcome one of the three key decision making factors: Logos, Pathos, and Ethos. One major concern of Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar is about rhetoric, the skill of persuading people with words. Appeals to logos, pathos and ethos are effectively made to reveal the characters as seen in Cassius, Brutus and Mark Antony respectively throughout the play.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Soon after the last breaths of one of Rome’s most popular general, Julius Caesar, Antony and Brutus were speaking in front of the people of Rome. Both cunning leaders were nimble in the art of persuasion and manipulation. The beloved leaders used the Ethos, Pathos, and Logos methods of persuasion to sway the crowd to his respective view of the actions of the night and their former general Julius Caesar.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus and Antony both use different rhetorical techniques to persuade the crowd at Julius Caesar's funeral. However, the arguments can be very different and one speech can be more persuasive than the other. Brutus's and Antony's speech have a different base on the same topic and both have a valid point in each. Brutus lectures about how Caesar is a courageous person. Antony, however, discourses about how Caesar is determined and how Brutus transferred captives home to Rome. Antony also speaks about how Caesar was a faithful man to Rome and to what degree he paid for his fault. Brutus talks about Caesar's honor and if Caesar was dead, then Rome would be complimentary.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comparing Brutus and Antony's funeral speeches from Act 3, Scene 2 of Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar" offers a profound insight into the art of persuasive oratory. Both orators possess distinct styles and objectives, making it a compelling exercise to evaluate which speech is superior in terms of effectiveness. Brutus, driven by his noble intentions and adherence to republican principles, delivers a rational and logical speech. He employs rhetorical devices such as ethos, pathos, and logos to sway the crowd to his perspective.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Antony’s funeral speech is more convincing and effective. Antony uses rhetorical questions to make it seem as though Caesar’s ambition was for the good of Rome. He states, “Did this in Caesar seem ambitious? . . . was this ambition?”…

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar’s Mark Antony prevails as the master of persuasion through language. In a eulogy speech for the recently deceased Caesar, he expertly employs repetition, reverse psychology, and flattery to manipulate the minds and hearts of his audience.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In society, we often look to those in authority for guidance or clarification in times of darkness and distress. In these situations, we look to the most righteous and trustworthy of them all to be our candles in the darkness. Julius Caesar was murdered because a collection of conspirators assumed that he may in the future abuse his power. The conspirators were Cassius, Metellus, Ligarius, Cinna, Casca, Trebonius, and Brutus, Caesar's close friend. People who are used to being public speakers, such as public leaders are able to sway their audience in any direction they want with the assistance of logos, pathos, ethos. Antony and Brutus were equally honorable and well-respected, but after comparing the two funeral speeches , there’s no debate that Antony had the most effective speech because his excellent range of logos, ethos, and pathos.…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sometimes, Brutus’s speech is considered to be the better of the two speeches. Yes, Brutus does use a lot of pathos to move the crowd. But Brutus doesn’t use a lot of other aids like ethos and pathos. Antony uses pathos, ethos, and even some logos to appeal to the crowd.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scheming, manipulation, and backstabbing are common in almost every society in this day and age. As seen on many occasions in Julius Caesar, the conspirators spend a lot of the play plotting against Caesar,because they fear what he might do if he comes to power. Brutus is portrayed as the tragic hero, and he gives numerous speeches to convey his opinions and feelings about the subject matter. In William Shakespeare’s play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, the character Marcus Brutus makes many appeals to rhetoric, specifically ethos and pathos, in order to get his point across to the audience.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Decius Brutus and Mark Antony, both Roman Senators, eulogize Julius Caesar, each using a different technique and approach. Brutus, in a somewhat arrogant, to the point, eulogy, attempts to sway the people. He justifies conspiring against Caesar by stating that Caesar's ambition would have hurt Rome. However, in Antony's eulogy, he focuses on Caesar's positive traits, and cunningly disproves Brutus' justification for killing Caesar. The fickle Romans waver between leaders, responding emotionally, rather than intellectually, to the orators.<br><br>Brutus seeks to explain why he conspired against Caesar. He begins his speech with "Romans, countrymen ...", appealing to their consciousness as citizens of Rome, who,…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare’s, “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar,” a group of conspirators plot to kill the ambitious Caesar. Their plot is successful and Caesar is murdered in the Capitol while his right-hand man, Mark Antony, flees. Antony returns and asks the conspirators if he can speak to the public about Caesar’s death. Brutus grants Antony’s request, but on the requirement that Brutus gives a speech first. Brutus uses Ethos to make the Romans believe he’s one of them, Logos to give reason for killing Caesar, and Pathos to show he did love Caesar. Meanwhile Antony uses Ethos the same as Brutus, to convince the people he’s one of them, Logos to show Caesar wasn't ambitious, and Pathos to portray his true liking for Caesar.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony loved Caesar and was completely against his murder, so he used rhetorical strategies to persuade the Romans to be against the perpetrators. For example when Antony says “Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man” he is using the mix of sarcasm and logos. Antony repeats this same thing over and over again until the Romans start questioning if Brutus truly is an honorable man. His sarcasm and repetition were both great rhetorical tactics that were used to manipulate and confuse the Roman’s minds. Antony brings together the perfect amount of ethos and pathos when he states, “ ‘Tis his will. Let but the commons hear this testament- which pardon me, I do not mean to read- And they would go and kiss dead Caesar’s wounds And dip their napkins in his sacred blood,” (III,ii,127-132). This is essential because it shows that Antony is credible and trustworthy because he has Caesar’s will. This also appeals to the people’s emotions because they become saddened over Caesar’s death. Antony used his tactics to make the Romans trust him and his views, which led to them rioting against the perpetrators. His use of ethos, pathos, and logos convinced the people that the assassination of Caesar was a cruel act and that Brutus, Cassius, and the other perpetrators are…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1976 I was diagnosed with Steven-Johnson Syndrome. I was two weeks shy of my third birthday. I developed a sore throat and was given my first penicillin injection. My parents tell me that, several days later, I spiked a fever and complained that my arms and legs hurt. I was refusing to move and didn’t want to eat anything so my parents took me back to the doctor. I had swollen joints and blistered areas noted in my mouth. I was admitted to the local hospital with a tentative diagnosis of measles. By the next day I had blisters and sloughing tissue in my mouth, genitals,…

    • 3032 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Poe vs. Hammett

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It is my belief that although Poe's Dupin, in The Purloined Letter, and Hammet's Spade, in The Maltese Falcon both have very unique qualities, they both share very similar moral codes. These codes of morality, they would like to believe, have no bearing on the world or society around them. They both follow their own moral standards and do not follow what is expected of them. As Spade repeatedly suggests that honesty and loyalty are not what he is concerned about. As it occurs in both cases, Dupin and Spade act as investigators, but to do their eccentric moral standards, they must mysteriously work around the men in uniform. They are unconventional. Unusual investigation tactics that were used such as bribery, which Spade tried against Cairo were not uncommon for characters like these (chapter 5). Likewise, Dupin, solves the theft by putting himself at risk politically. Unlike the uniformed investigators, Dupin is able to solve the case by detaching himself emotionally. It is clear, however, the both Spade and Dupin are driven to solve the cases due to personal revenge or personal motive. In the end, both of these characters become the hero of the story. In Spade's case, although his motives might be self-righteous, he is able to find and turn in the killer. Dupin solves most of his cases on personal intuition; however, he as well becomes the hero as he solves the theft of the letter.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays