should be indicated as a suitable literary text that enables to relate with the various theories. Feminism, post-structuralism and structuralism are especially possible to exclusively implicate in the way that Philip forms the text. For structuralism, it is evident that the poem wavers between legal language, that involving Gregson v Gilbert, and poetry in order trigger meaning, emotion and history; thereby implying structuralist view about signified and signifier. In addition, connectedness with post-structuralism also reveals itself: The assertion by Philip, “There is no telling this story; it must be told” (Philip 195) is enough to paint the reader decentering the author from being the subject inquiry, in deriving meaning. For feminism, the way in which she structures movement by the words, without introducing a pronoun (he or she) allows her to support the feminist movement of making writing gender
should be indicated as a suitable literary text that enables to relate with the various theories. Feminism, post-structuralism and structuralism are especially possible to exclusively implicate in the way that Philip forms the text. For structuralism, it is evident that the poem wavers between legal language, that involving Gregson v Gilbert, and poetry in order trigger meaning, emotion and history; thereby implying structuralist view about signified and signifier. In addition, connectedness with post-structuralism also reveals itself: The assertion by Philip, “There is no telling this story; it must be told” (Philip 195) is enough to paint the reader decentering the author from being the subject inquiry, in deriving meaning. For feminism, the way in which she structures movement by the words, without introducing a pronoun (he or she) allows her to support the feminist movement of making writing gender