Preview

How Does Lincoln's Constitution Reflect The Ideals Of The Constitution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
444 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Does Lincoln's Constitution Reflect The Ideals Of The Constitution
Brennan asserted, “Each generation has the choice to overrule or add to the fundamental principles enunciated by the Framers; the Constitution can be amended or it can be ignored.” Ignoring the principles of the Constitution directly conflicted with Lincoln’s reverence for the founding documents.
Brennan maintained, “Protection of human dignity of such citizens requires a much modified view of the proper relationship of individual and state.” The progressive ideology envisioned a society where every person’s r where resources were equally distributed among the people. The powers of the state and federal governments would come secondary to the rights of the people. President Woodrow Wilson described government as, “not a machine, but a
…show more content…
“It is almost exactly true to say they framed it, and it is altogether true to say they fairly represented the opinion and sentiment of the whole nation at that time.” Lincoln shaped his views on American government on the consent of the governed. The Founders made necessary concessions to create a perpetual union. The values expressed in the Constitution reflected the will of the people.
ADD TO THIS SECTION ABOUT SLAVERY - Lincoln countered Douglas’s claim that slavery was a state’s rights issue. He insisted that slavery “is a part of our national life”; therefore, it must be eliminated on a national level. LINCOLN’S AND BRENNAN’S VIEWS ON THE SUPREME COURT
Lincoln and Brennan’s views on the importance of the Supreme Court differed greatly. Brennan believed the Court was “the last word on the meaning of the Constitution”, while Lincoln asserted the people had a duty to review decisions made by the Court. If the people blindly followed rulings of the Court, “the instant they [Supreme Court decisions] are made…the people will have ceased to be their own rulers…practically resigned their government, into the hands of that eminent

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Excluding slavery from Stephen Douglas's argument I do believe that Douglas made some good points about state rights. He proposed that true freedom came from a local self-government. That a diverse nation needed to be respectful of its states in order to survive. Douglas uses the constitution to support his ideas. H says the constitution gives, "each state of this Union has a right to do as it pleases on the subject of slavery.…

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apush Chapter 6 Ids

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Believed that power came ultimately from the people. Constitution created a supreme law that no state could defy.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For anyone who has taken Civics or an American Government class in high school, should know how important the Declaration of Independence, the U.S. Constitution, and the Bill of Rights are to this country. “When in the Course of human events”, “We hold these truths to be self-evident”, “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness”, and “We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union” should be some of the most recognizable phrases written in some of the most significant documents in history (www.LOC.gov and www.Archives.gov). In the book Judicial Tyranny: The New Kings of America by Mark Sutherland, readers are able to understand what the true role of government should have been and should be for the future as intended by our Founding Fathers. With chapters written by some of the most prominent and notable judges, attorneys, politicians, authors, theologians and most importantly, Christians, readers see the…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    APUSH Ch 15 Essays

    • 971 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In this document, Lincoln argued that the Founders in 1776 created a single nation and not thirteen independent sovereign states. This did not give any state the legal authority to leave the union on its own. His adversary on this point was John C. Calhoun. Calhoun took the opposite position by declaring that the Declaration of Independence created thirteen “free and independent states”. This stated that the states having created the union therefore had the right to nullify unconstitutional laws. This also gave them the right to even secede from the union. Both sides of the argument could find justification for their points in the history of the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation, and the U.S. Constitution. This is part of the reason why it took a civil war to settle the issue. Lincoln saw both sides of the argument, but he still believed that the Founders wrote the Declaration of Independence with the idea of a single growing nation. This did not give states the right to leave or secede from the Union on their own will.…

    • 971 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Babbbit Ranch Case Study

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Any other family members, thus making Billy Cordasco a unanimous vote, did not desire the current position of president.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Abraham Lincoln’s core values were derived from The Constitution, The Declaration of Independence, and the ideology of the founding fathers this is evident from the phrases that President Lincoln used in Source C.…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lincoln believed that the recent Supreme Court decision on the Dred Scott case was part of a Democratic conspiracy that would lead to the legalization of slavery in all states. Referring to the court's decision which permitted Dred Scott to live in a free state and yet remain a slave, he said, "what Dred's Scott's master might lawfully do with Dred Scott, in the free state of Illinois, every other master may lawfully do with one thousand slaves, in Illinois, or in any other free state”. Abraham Lincoln’s “house divided” speech was a response to the political situation in the United States in that he would achieve his goals of stopping the spread of slavery into other territories, by arguing that Douglas was acting to spread slavery across the nation. Douglas told Americans that Lincoln was completely irresponsible in saying that a house is divided, Douglas was forever against Lincoln ideas and speeches. Lincoln lost elections to Douglas but his eloquence in politics kept him the national limelight and opened way to his…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Constitutional interpretation has been among the foremost politically pressing issues since the moment the ink from the founder’s pens dried. The vague, broad wording – originally intended by the founders to allow the constitution to grow with our fledgling democracy – has led to intricate disputes arising over issues such as the true meaning of the word “commerce” and the intended extend of federal jurisdiction in Marbury v. Madison. After over two centuries of contestation, the court has organically settled on two basic methods of interpretation, each championed by leading Supreme Court justices: Originalism and Non-Originalism. Despite arising from individual personal ideologies of justices, they have come to be the defining methodologies…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lincoln starts his argument about the 13th amendment with the story of Melissa Goings being said that she murdered her husband. In Lincoln’s statement he says that the court decided she had enough justice done. After this story, he makes the argument I decided that the constitution gives me many powers. Using the argument allows him to show the cabinet members how much power he has during the war. While also saying that is why he decided he needed the powers to exist to uphold my oath to protect the constitution. This argument shows Lincoln’s decisions are based on the oath he took when taking office and doing his duties while there. Also, that he needs to protect the people’s constitutional rights. Because he knew the men would use the facts…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Lincoln believed that the nation cannot exist forever haft and haft free because he believed that all people are equal. In the article, He said “there is no reason in the world why the negro is not entitled to all natural rights enumerated in the Declaration of Independence, the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Then, he also said that blacks American should have the same rights as the white man. With Lincoln, he expect that every man will have the change and black man is entitled to it which he can have a better condition. Lincoln also believe that if slavery were allowed to expand, “love of liberty” would be extinguished and with it America’s special mission to be a symbol of democracy for the entire world. In contract, Douglas believed that the nation can exist half free and half slave. In his view, he assumed that “this government was made on the white basis.” It means all laws that were made by white men and for their own benefits. Yet, he claimed that “’the signers of the Declaration of Independence had no reference to the negro whatever when they declared all men to be created equal.”…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The progressives believe in a large central government because the market and civil society alone are inadequate means of solving nation’s problems. Therefore, they believe the federal government must exercise its power to protect the people. “Progressives believe that the government must step in to correct the failures of markets, restore efficiency, maintain full employment, and promote public needs and equity in society,”(Teixeira and Halpin, 5). Persell believes that the three should be equal; progressives believe that the government should be large and the others will follow. Progressives also believe that a stronger government is necessary to advance the good of the nation and to promote growth while protecting workers from problems like exploitation. Unlike Jefferson they believed that small government is not effective enough in a time where inequality is rising. Fredrick Douglas would disagree was Persell as well. Fredrick Douglas was an abolitionist and he would agree the civil society could be bad. Civil society is what shaped the government to keep slavery alive, so Douglas believes a larger government would abolish slavery and squeeze out the destructive influences. Douglas would also disagree because he would need a larger economy and new policies to help the south after abolition and help former slaves get a good economic…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He firmly believes that the Constitution should only be interpreted in a way that does not go against the original objective the founding fathers had about a particular affair. On the other hand, Justice William J. Brennan was a liberal judge who believed that the Constitution was adaptable and it was possible to conform it to serve current society. His philosophy is that laws and restrictions can never violate a person’s dignity and self worth. Brennan also believed that the ‘majority rule’ system is unfair because it imposes its ruling over the minorities which he considers political imperialism. A judge who believed the exact opposite of this philosophy was Justice William Rehnquist. He considers himself a conservative but his actions show him as a moderate. Rehnquist said in one of his speeches that, “political majorities are entitled to enact positive law and impose their moral view on the minorities”(Lanahan 300). He believed that the law is backed by “moral goodness” and cannot be corrupted. As we can see, the judicial philosophy of each justices depends on their individual perspective of the Constitution and…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Answering this question will force students to pay attention to two things that Lincoln say that this nation is “conceived in Liberty” and “dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal; students need to grasp the structure of the sentence: these two phrases modify and describe the “new nation.This is a hard question to answer without moving on to…

    • 180 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus discusses the time in United States history where the public was called to make a right decisions. This decision would impact their liberty along with that of future unborn generations to come. The ideal of ratifying the constitution in the distant past. In this case, this anti-federalist analyzes whether to adopt the constitution. Brutus warned that there were insufficient protections against the expansion of government in the Constitution. In the past, when individuals part with power, the only manner in which to obtain it back is through force. Thus, these occurrences must be prevented by Americans and their choices. In fact, Brutus points out that in several occasions individuals voluntarily provide their ruler with power. However,…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The passage came to represent a moral standard to which the United States should strive. This view was notably promoted by Abraham Lincoln, who considered the Declaration to be the foundation of his political philosophy, and argued that the Declaration is a statement of principles through which the United States Constitution should be interpreted (cite). It has inspired work for the rights of marginalized people throughout the world. Freedom is the oldest of clichés and the most modern of aspirations. At various times in our history, it has served as the rallying cry of the powerless and as a justification of the status quo. Freedom helps to bind our culture together and exposes the contradictions between what America claims to be and what it sometimes has been. American history is not a narrative of continual progress toward greater and greater freedom. As the abolitionist Thomas Wentworth Higginson noted after the Civil War, “relutions may go backward”. Though freedom can be achieved, it may also be taken away.…

    • 3052 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays