Preview

What Lincoln When Was The United States A House Divided

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
552 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Lincoln When Was The United States A House Divided
Professor’s name:
Subject code:
Student’s name:
Due date:
What Lincoln meant when he called United States “a house divided” and how the country was at odds over the economic systems of the south and the principles of the nation?
The origin of the phrase is the Bible, in the gospel of Mark 3:25 and Mathew 12:25Jesus said the house divided speech was given by Abraham Lincoln in 1958 in Illinois state capitol in Springfield during campaigns. In this metaphor “a house divided” the house stands for the union (to the United States of America) and that the house was divided slave and the Free State. Either the opponents of slavery will arrest the further spread it of it, and place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in the course of ultimate
…show more content…
Lincoln believed that the recent Supreme Court decision on the Dred Scott case was part of a Democratic conspiracy that would lead to the legalization of slavery in all states. Referring to the court's decision which permitted Dred Scott to live in a free state and yet remain a slave, he said, "what Dred's Scott's master might lawfully do with Dred Scott, in the free state of Illinois, every other master may lawfully do with one thousand slaves, in Illinois, or in any other free state”. Abraham Lincoln’s “house divided” speech was a response to the political situation in the United States in that he would achieve his goals of stopping the spread of slavery into other territories, by arguing that Douglas was acting to spread slavery across the nation. Douglas told Americans that Lincoln was completely irresponsible in saying that a house is divided, Douglas was forever against Lincoln ideas and speeches. Lincoln lost elections to Douglas but his eloquence in politics kept him the national limelight and opened way to his

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lincoln’s poisition on slavery differ from that of Stephen Douglas. Abraham Lincoln believed that the slavery was very uncommon and scary that it scared the supreme court to declare that the Constitution can not extend slavery in the new states. Lincoln was scared to spread slvaery in the new territories which was connected with the Dred Scott decision of 1857. Stephan Douglass on the other hand argued for the popular sovereignity. Mostly advocating the territories that the people could extend slavery by not following the law, he supported the Dred Scoot deciison of 1857.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    ADD TO THIS SECTION ABOUT SLAVERY - Lincoln countered Douglas’s claim that slavery was a state’s rights issue. He insisted that slavery “is a part of our national life”; therefore, it must be eliminated on a national level.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “A house divided against itself cannot stand.” Abraham Lincoln uttered these words on June 17, 1858 at the Republican state convention in Illinois. Three short years later, the first shots of the Civil War would be fired at Fort Sumter. Brothers fighting brothers, killing 620,000 of their own. This would be the start of the bloodiest war in American history. The debate over popular sovereignty, the conflicting opinions on slavery, and the publication of Uncle Tom’s Cabin all lead to the inevitable declaration of a civil war.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 27, 1858, there was an argument called the “Lincoln-Douglas Debate.” Lincoln said, “I confess I would be exceedingly glad to see Congress abolish slavery in the District of Columbia, and, in the language of Henry Clay, "sweep from our capital that foul blot upon our nation."” (Lincoln 1). This is proof he was against slavery. In this debate, he speaks on his beliefs on the Fugitive Slave Law, the end of slave trade throughout states, and the abolition of slavery in D.C.(District Columbia). Two years later, he was elected the 16th president of the U.S., which was the start of the civil war.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The main causes of the Lincoln-Douglas Debates of 1858 were great in number. The first was Abraham Lincoln claiming that Douglas was encouraging fears of amalgation of the races with enough success to drive thousands of people away from the Republican Party. The second was that Stephen A. Douglas was claiming that Lincoln was an abolitionist for saying that the American Declaration of Independence applied, in fact, to both blacks and whites. The third cause was Lincoln arguing that in his "House Divided" speech that Douglas was part of the conspiracy to nationalize slavery. Lincoln also expressed fear that the next Dred Scott decision would end up with Illinois as a slave state.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lincoln is remembered as being the president to abolish slavery, however the truth is different. He was in favor of segregation. On september 18, 1858 at a debate at Charleston, Illinois Lincoln said “I will not say then that i am not, nor have ever been. , in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the whites and black races”. Continuing on that, Lincoln voiced his opinion that blacks should not have the right to vote, serve on juries, be in government, or marry into a white family.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many times during our class discussions and lectures we tried to examine the stages leading up to the succession and Civil War in America. During the critical time period of the middle 19th century, the Dred Scott v. Sanford decision of the Supreme Court was one of those major treads on the pathway to secession. The man Dred Scott was taken to Missouri with Peter Blow as a slave from Virginia and sold. His new master from Missouri then moved to the free state of Illinois for a while, but later moved back to Missouri. Following his master 's passing, Scott asserted that since he had resided in a free state, he was inevitably a free citizen.…

    • 2271 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scott V. Stanford was going on at the moment. It was talking about how African Americans weren’t citizens, they were just slaves, and Lincoln did not like that. Lincoln disagreed with what they said, and that when the Inalienable Acts started. Abraham wanted to see if Stephen Douglas would take a challenge to fight for the senate seat. Abraham gave a nomination acceptance speech, and to the Supreme Court, Stephen Douglas, and President Buchanan. Abraham Lincoln stated, “A house divided cannot stand”. In 1858, the Senate Campaign had seven debates in cities across the state of Illinois. Douglas and Lincoln did not disappoint. Douglas soon won the election. Lincoln then moved to national politics. In 1860, the political operatives made a campaign. On May 18, there was a Republican National Convention in Chicago. Lincoln’s nominated due was on the views of slavery. In a general election, he had to face his friend and rival, Stephen Douglas. Lincoln didn’t get forty percent of the popular vote, but he did get 180 electoral votes out of 303. Lincoln had made a strong cabinet, and his cabinet contained some political rivals. His cabinet was one of the strongest assets on the first term. On April 12, 1861, the guns were stationed as a symbol the war has begun. Lincoln gave out $2 million for Treasury for war material. He wanted at least 75,000 volunteers for the military. He even suspended the writ of habeas…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1850 Dbq Analysis

    • 1684 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Stephen Douglas made a remark about compromise in his speech in Alton, Illinois,”… Our fathers knew, when they made the government, that the laws and institutions which were well adapted to the green mountains of Vermont, were unsuited to the rice plantations of South Carolina.” In order for those laws of Vermont to be suite to South Carolina, Vermont has to give up something and South Carolina has to give something back, like obeying those laws for instant. The government was built upon compromise. Before the Civil War and in Lincoln’s First Inaugural Address, Lincoln repeatedly said, “I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so…” Lincoln was being persuasive in getting the South states to stay in the Union. He knew that slavery will be abolished soon but it was not the time yet. Lincoln went about winning the Congressmen seat by figuratively trapping Douglas; he cornered him with questions during the Lincoln-Douglas Debates on slavery. Lincoln thought it was wrong but wanted to leave it alone, but Douglas had been tied to the Kansas-Nebraska Act which almost allowed slavery in an anti-slavery North but didn’t thanks to popular sovereignty, which is a decision that is decided by its people. Lincoln claimed he was going against the North by letting slaves in the Northern Territories, Lincoln (Republican) went on to lose the Congress seat to Douglas but later beat him for the Presidency of 1860. Again, in an attempt to save the Union, this time by Lincoln, failed because the South knew Lincoln would abolish slavery one way or another. They knew he would do so because of his speech given at the Republican state convention in Springfield, Illinois. He said, “…I believe this Government cannot endure permanently half slave and half free…It will become all one thing, or all…

    • 1684 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dred Scott argued that he had been freed as a result of living with his master in the free state of Illinois and in federal territory. The Missouri Compromise forbade slavery there. In the slave states, slaves were considered valuable property; Mrs. Emerson did not want to lose the Scotts. Her main argument was that they were depriving her…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    a better chance at connecting with the audience there. Lincoln was disappointed to realize, that most people seemed to be for slavery and not against it which only helped Douglas in the debates. In Charleston, Lincoln knew he had to work even harder to come back from Jonesboro. Lincoln took this opportunity to show his support to the Fugitive Slave Law and to break away from the idea of him being an abolitionist. Lincoln made sure that all he spoke was truth and to accept that fact that sometimes he was wrong. Lincoln stated in this debate that he believed that slavery was being protected by the Constitution, and although it was a bold statement, it seemed to move in his favor. Also, Lincoln stated, “Now, my opinion is, that the different States have the power to make a negro a citizen under the Constitution of the United States, if they choose. The Dred Scott decision decides that they have not” (Holzer, 226). Lincoln began to regain his confidence in the fifth debate at Knox College. Lincoln spoke more aggressively and firmly attacked Douglas’ points. Lincoln believed that no one should be able to take away an individual’s God-given right to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness,” blacks were “our equals” (Holzer, 236). If Lincoln had one belief that could never be taken away from him, it would be that everyone was equal and that slavery was “morally and politically wrong.” This debate was a very important mile…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Was Pro Slavery Wrong

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages

    From the 1830s to 1850s there was a battle to expand slavery all the way to the south and west. The question of slavery grew forming pro-slavery and anti-slavery movements in the American states. Americans who were pro-slavery formed an ideology of which may seek benefits for both slaves and masters. On the other belief system anti-slavery Americans stood where they desired to prove that slaves were held in a violent system and seemed to be unable to escape the system. When we examine slavery, it is beneficial to see the people’s viewpoint from each side because it gives a complete outlook, not just one side.…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The House Divided Speech was addressed by Abraham Lincoln on June 1958. He delivered the speech upon his acceptance of Illinois Republican Party’s nomination as the senator of the state. Thus the speech became a very important launching campaign for his success in politics thus giving him a national limelight that saw him in the elections to the presidency in 1860.The speech primarily addressed on the issue of slavery in America. Abraham Lincoln delivered his speech aimed at establishing his strong beliefs towards the acts of slavery. The speech was also meant to point out a differentiating factor of beliefs from Stephen Douglas and the rest of the top governmental officials who seemed to practice corruption in their transactions.…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the long run the debates were favorable to Lincoln and fatal to Douglas. Lincoln gained national status from his performance and became a serious contender in the presidential election. Douglas, however, having argued during the debates that slavery in the territories could be prohibited by local motivation. It helped to split the party and thus virtually destroying his fervent Presidential…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lowance Jr., Mason I. A House Divided: The Antebellum Slavery Debates in America, 1776-1865. 1. Princeton University Press, 2003. 60.…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays