How Does Tomi Lahren Use 'SOB'?

Part One: Tomi Lahren uses “SOB” when referring to Mohammad Abdulazeez, which is a euphemism. This type of language creates misunderstanding for the audience. I had never heard “SOB” before and had to google it, she used it to cover up her saying a bad word. Instead of using that she should've just not called Mohammad Abdulazeez anything. A jargon that she used was “B-1 bomber,” this is a word not everyone can understand since it's specifically referring to a type of aircraft that is used in America.
Part Two: An empirical/factual claim she states is about telling her friend that is deployed in the Middle East that it is safer there than in the United States. A policy claim she asserts is that the people from America should “bring the fight to them, full force” referring to the Middle East. An example of a value claim is when she mentions that yesterdays moderate is today’s terrorist. These claims harm her argument, because they aren’t necessarily true. She didn’t prove any of them with facts. They are based on induction because they have to do with her own observations, so they are just opinions.
Part Three: She uses red herring when she mentions that military men and women being attacked is an American problem, right after she changes the subject to how she comes from a family of marines.
Another fallacy she uses is begging the question, she claims that someone needs to be a leader and fight back to solve this problem. These fallacies do work, because people get persuaded into doing what she says and agreeing with her. The red herring fallacy she used creates emotion, by letting the audience know about her many family members being marines. Begging the question creates inspiration, it persuades people into wanting to help
solve Rios 2 this problem.
Part Four: An example of bias by omission she uses is in her opening line, mentioning how things like lack of free community college, wage inequality, gay marriage, and white racism didn’t kill these marines. The reason she states those is to pretty much imply that those things aren’t that important as most liberals make it seem. Another example is when she mentions that she doesn’t care if Abdulazeez was quiet or smart, or any of the traits that can imply there is another reason why he did, what he did. The purpose of reporting news in this way is to not allow liberals to have anything to say, but agree. It doesn’t serve the people because they aren’t getting the full story.