In 1850 Britain was extremely far from being known as a democracy. This was due to the fact that the great reform act only extended the power of the vote from wealthy landowning men in 1832 to the wealthy middle class men. This meant that the majority of the population still were unable to vote. For a country to be democratic it entails to have certain circumstances which would include the majority of the population, every adult, having the right to vote for their country. There should also be an equal amount of seats distributed. All elections that take place should be run fairly and be restricted from intimidation and influence. Every adult should also only be entitled to one vote whereas at this time some individuals who went to university could vote in their university constituency as well as when they owned a property. It should be allowed that a person from any background is able to become an MP. By 1918 many of these circumstances had been met although not all. Although improvements had been met in Britain some aspects that would make the country fully become a democracy where not in place, therefore it can be argued that Britain was not fully a democracy by 1918.
When the 1867 reform act was passed it gave the vote to every male householder living in a borough constituency, the working class men in the towns. Even though is increased the amount of individuals able to vote in Britain it was still very restricted as it was explained that the vote was only passed to men that owned a property over the value of £10 a year. This did double the amount of men able to vote although women still had no right to vote for their country. The 1884 reform act extended the vote to the working class people in the countryside; this managed to increase the electorate by 50%. However the undemocratic feature of this which still remained was that men who owned a property in a different constituency although they could also vote in their university constituency therefore plural voting was still in place and this wasn’t abolished until 1948 so therefore this was also a feature that kept Britain from being a democracy. Historian TC Smout mentioned “unfortunately, due to the continued existence of groups who were not enfranchised… the act left some 40% of the adult males in the UK sill enfranchised in 1911, clearly concentrated in the poor and younger working class. The representation of the people act did not occur until 1918, this gave the vote to all men over the age of 21 and also introduced to giving the vote to women over the age of 30. Although 22 per cent of women of 30 years were still unable to vote due to the fact they were not property owners and it wasn’t until 1928 that all adults over 21 including women got the vote. Therefore it can be argued that by 1918 had become a lot more democratic than previously due to the fact women were now able to vote although it can also be brought forward that they were still somewhat not democratic due to the fact the for women was not equal to men as it did not manage to supply them all with the right.
Having an equal distribution of seats is another important part to democracy. In the 1867 reform act the redistribution of seats was made fairer due to the fact boroughs which had become depopulated in time lost their right to send MP’s to parliament, while growing towns were able to gain the right to send more MPs. Even though in 1832 rotten boroughs were removed this made it fairer. However it was still not totally reasonable due to the circumstance that landowning interests in the south of England were still over-represented in parliament and the growing towns were somewhat under-represented. The aim of the law that was passed in 1885 was to try to reflect more accurately on the changing population of Britain. This law made changes such as 79 towns whose population had fallen lost their right to elect an MP. Another 36 towns also with falling populations had the number of MPs representing them reduced to one. Whereas at the same time, growing towns were given the right to elect two MPs and also larger towns were divided into several different constituencies where each separate one where given an MP. This helped on making Britain a democracy as it made the situation fairer. In 1918 this area improved as it was recognised so that each MP represented 70,000 people. This marked the end of the old country borough distinction. Even though this was progress towards Britain becoming a democracy it was still not fully democratic.
For a country to be considered as a democracy there should be a fair voting system in place that every person to be authorized to. Corruption was a serious problem even after the 1867 reform act was passed in British politics. Despite increasing the electorate from eight per cent of adults to twenty eight per cent, the newly enfranchised men found their independence limited by the system of open voting and by the excessive spending activities of well-off candidates at the election. Changes were made when the secret ballot act was passed in 1872. These changes included allowing voters to vote in secret in the polling booths which certainly helped remove the evident examples of bribery and influence that occurred towards the voters. This helped towards the growth of democracy as it allowed people to have their own personal opinion and vote without intimidation from others.
In 1883 more changes were brought forward to tackling corruption and intimidation. The corrupt and illegal practices act was passed. This brought changes involving limiting how much candidates could spend during election time. It also banned activities such as the buying food and drink for votes to persuade them to vote for what they believe. This would have helped the growth of democracy as it meant the voters had their own say and couldn’t be bribed to vote for a certain candidate. It also made the voting system fairer as it gave each applicant the same amount of time during the election.
In democracy it should be acceptable for any person to become an MP regardless of their personal background. For most of the nineteenth century MPs where unpaid and had to own land to be able to get a place as one. Minus the fact property qualification’s to become an MP ended in the 1850s, the working class men who had to work all day for their living for very low wages could not afford to give up it up to become an MP. For Britain to become a democracy, the chance to become an MP would have to be opened to everyone and not just the wealthy. In 1911 MPs began to be paid. This allowed ordinary people who didn’t make or own a property over a certain amount to participate more in the political process.
The parliament act of 1911 was also a large contribution to the road towards democracy. It reduced the power of the House of Lords so that they had no say over the budgets and could no longer veto bill passed by the House of Commons. The only say they had was that they were able to delay them for up to two years, and later by 1949 it was reduced to one year. This made Britain more democratic due to the fact it meant things were fairer.
I conclusion by 1918 some progress was made towards Britain becoming a democratic country. Although there were still many factors that had to be considered before it could be fully known as a democracy. This included areas widely involving fair votes for women which weren’t completed until 1928. Therefore at this time the country was somewhat becoming a democracy although many steps still had to be accomplished before it was considered in this way.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Being that England was a traditionally more liberal and reform-minded country, it had some of the best success in creating a substantial shift in government policies to become more caring (specifically within Parliament). Those of the London Workingmen’s Association petitioned the English Parliament in 1838 for increased male suffrage (Doc 4) among other electoral reforms. They did, in fact, find success with the passage of the “Great Reform Act,” which was a law that guaranteed male suffrage, a more fair distribution of the electorate, and the requirement that members of Parliament needed to own property. Of course, the chartists of Doc. 4 were very one-sided in their petition and failed to see that the passage of the Charter would practically allow those exact workers to obtain high seats in government. Nevertheless, the reforms did improve the overall livelihood of the British masses enough to allow John Stuart Mill to assert that “the general tendency [of…
- 1031 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
I believe that some people did not want women to vote partly because of the fear of the unknown, but also because they believed that women to be made to stick to household duties, getting married, and having kids. They were expected to take care of the kids as well as the father went out for work.…
- 332 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The Source shows that towards the end of the 19th century there is an increase in both school boards and poor law boards which involve women in their political sphere. This was seen as just an extension onto their Angel in the House role and to give them the national vote would be pointless because women were needed within local politics and also it would give husbands two votes. Therefore it did seem possible that the national vote was further away than ever because women already had their place in…
- 751 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Reform of the electoral system finally arrived with the 1832 Reform Act, which increased the proportion of eligible voters in England and Wales to 18 per cent of the adult-male population and 12 per cent in Scotland. Although the working classes had high hopes for the Reform Act, they eventually felt betrayed as despite the new legislation, the poor ultimately remained voiceless in the way their country was run. In the years following the Reform Act, the Chartists would begin to plan their campaign to try to effect real electoral change in Britain.…
- 1203 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
There were many people who argued that because women had worked so relentlessly during the war, it would be impossible to deny them the vote, especially due to the fact that working class men got the vote that were on the frontlines. Source 5, a letter from Lord Selborne to Lord Salisbury argues this point, and claims that it would not only be unjust to the women; it would also be “dangerous to State”, as it would be a gross corruption of morality and standards, because of the “the steadying influence…
- 1048 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
"Describe the steps taken between 1832 and 1918 to extend the suffrage in England. What group and movements contributed to the extension of the vote?" Several groups, movements and reform bills passed between 1832 and 1918 extended the suffrage in England. The process took many years and the voting rights were first given to the wealthier and more distinguished men, then later to the less wealthy men, and finally to women. The major reform bills that extended the suffrage in England were the Reform Bill of 1832, 1867, and 1884, and the Qualification of Women Act in 1917. (Mazour, Peoples) The suffrage movement began in 1832 when the Reform Bill of 1832 was passed by parliment. The Prime Minister since 1830, Earl Grey, authored the Bill and it was introduced to the House of Commons in March of 1831 by John Russell. The bill was put down several times between 1831 and 1832. These decisions sent the English people into frenzies and riots broke out in many British towns. Finally the bill was passed in 1832 when it was brought to parliament for the third time. The bill gave men who occupied homes with an annual value of 10 pounds the right to vote, but left out large sections of the lower middle class. Although some people were dissatisfied with the new bill because it only gave one in seven males the right to vote, it was a step in the right direction for the British. (Spartacus Educational Website) After the Reform Bill of 1832 was passed a group of citizens formed the Workingman's Association, supporters of which were called chartists. The chartists believed in universal manhood suffrage and the secret ballot. The proposals were made known in the People's Charter, which was denied by the Parliament. The chartists attempted to achieve their goal of universal manhood suffrage by using moral force, petitions, general strikes, physical force, public meetings and chartist newspapers which spread propaganda. These tactics proved to be useless because the parliament would…
- 1429 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
(c) Is pressure group politics in the UK better described as pluralist or as elitist?…
- 4329 Words
- 18 Pages
Good Essays -
Up until 1832 the right to vote had split the country. Only male members of the aristocracy, and land or property owners had the right to vote, making up 3% of the population. By 1867 voting rights were extended to those men who rented property rather than owning it dramatically increasing the size of the electorate. The middle classes were on a mission as they entered the political arena coming with demands of civil and religious liberties. The rising middle class saw themselves as pioneers for change, and believed in a society based of merit and nor on birthright.…
- 99 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Public pressure had a large part to do with the passing of the 1867 reform bill in many ways. Most working class men at this time felt they were ready for the vote, this lead to the creation of pressure groups these would campaign for enfranchisement. In 1864 the national reform union was set up, this was mainly aimed at bringing the interests of the working and middle class men together in politics. Also created in 1864 was the reform league, although similar to the national reform union this was much more radical, it mainly aimed towards having universal male suffrage and a secret ballot. These groups would hold rallies of over 100,000 to try and put pressure on the government and get the bill passed, these groups doing this is significant evidence that public pressure could have been a large contributor to the passing of the act.…
- 738 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
This leniency started with the drafting of the Carter of Liberties. Foner states “the charter required that elections be held every three years among male property owners and the freemen of New York City; it also reaffirmed traditional English rights” (Foner, p. 93). The English liberties that were establish allowed more individuals to vote, and gave some power back to the lower class colonist. Forer states “it is estimated that between 50 and 80 precent of adult white men could vote in eighteenth century America” (Foner, p. 150). More of the lower class having the availability to vote make the statement that the upper class had more power in government less persuasive. This is because the lower class had more power of choosing who would control the power of their respective…
- 833 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
These criteria changed in the 1828 election; most requirements got dropped, meaning that the majority of white men could vote. In turn, this raised the number of people who voted from 356,038…
- 1015 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
17.2%3"( see bibliography # 5). Also, women had just recently won the right to vote,but many females were the breadwinners in their families rather than the men," married women working outside the home to help support their families. Black women especially found it easier to obtain work than their husbands, working as domestic servants, clerks, textiles workers and other occupations. This employment increased their status and power in the home, gaining them a new voice in domestic decisions." ( see bibliography # 4).The amount of people who voted declined as well,"Percentage of Eligible Voters Who Cast Ballots in General Elections in 1920: 43.5%in 1924: 43.9%in 1928: 51.9%in 1932: 52.5%in 1936: 57.0%in 1940: 59.2%in 1944: 52.9%" ( see bibliography #…
- 1302 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Probably, this change was especially true for women’s position. They acquired the voting right by the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment, which brought a great deal of freedom for them. This was the time when they made the greatest efforts to break away from the traditional norms of womanhood, and I assert…
- 1390 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The right to vote is one of the fundamental rights that serves as an indicator for freedom of a people, and can be seen in the history of every nation. Before Australia gained sovereignty in 1901, only male British subjects over 21 years of age were allowed to vote. In 1902, the Commonwealth of Australia uniformly passed into law the right of women over 21 years of age to vote, but deliberately excluded ‘native’ women and men from doing so. During this period, both indigenous men and women were excluded from voting in federal elections unless already registered within a state government, which was very difficult to do. In addition to the policy barring Aboriginal peoples from voting, there was a lack of inclusion in society that discouraged…
- 184 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
In most modern governments, such as the United States of America, give the right to vote to almost every responsible adult citizen. There were limiters on the right to vote when the US Constitution was written, and the individual states were allowed to setup their own rules governing who was allowed to vote. Women were denied the right to vote until the Nineteenth Amendment to the Constitution which was passed in 1920. In order to understand how women struggled to obtain the right to vote, some key factors must be looked at in further detail; why suffrage rights were not defined in the Constitution, the efforts that women put forth to obtain the right to vote, why there are present-day restrictions on voting, and the implications of Suffrage in current political policy.…
- 2809 Words
- 12 Pages
Powerful Essays