Preview

How Far Was Concern Over National Security 1906 Analysis

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1679 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Far Was Concern Over National Security 1906 Analysis
Extended response – Henry Oldfield
How Far Was Concern Over National Security The Real Reason For Liberal Reforms Passed between 1906-1914?

By the early twentieth century the Liberal Government was concerned that Britain was losing its status as a major industrial and military power. Concern over national security played a considerable part in persuading the government that reform was needed. However, this was only one of a handful of factors that influenced the government. As well as national security, the Government was also concerned over the national efficiency of the country. The new Labour party competed with the Liberals and promised the country social reforms, and in order for the Liberal Government to stay in power they had to offer similar reforms in order not to lose votes. Although, the simple change of attitudes within the Liberal party promoted the idea of municipal socialism and ultimately brought about reform. Lastly, the result of poverty in
…show more content…
Since 1884, most working class men had the vote and the Liberals wanted to attract those votes. However, by 1906 a new party, the Labour Party, was competing for the same votes. If the Liberals were seen as unsympathetic to the poor, what might happen at elections in the future? Although the Labour Party was insignificant with relation to the Liberals in 1906, it did give cause for concern as the growth of Labour showed that the workingman felt that they needed representation within the political system, that the Labour party offered them. The threat of Labour as a motive for reform before the twentieth century was not large. However, the threat of Labour grew, and the pressure began to be felt from 1909 onwards due to high unemployment caused by Britain’s recession. It was therefore politically advantageous of the Liberal government to offer social reform, even if they did not fully believe in the principle of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In this paper I will attempt to explain how the depression of the 1890s had effects on the political tensions at the turn of the century. In order to do this, the information as to what caused the depression will also need to be provided. Many citizens rebelled against the elected leaders and dissatisfaction spread widely throughout America during this time period because of political stalemates. New political factions rose up during this era. Economic depression dominated the 1890s and reshaped political positions and attitudes.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government could not fumction without money so the issue was put to the voters to decide. The Conservatives had to win a large number of seats in order to justify their rejection of the budget, however they did not and ithe election was therefore a defeat for the Conservatives. However, the Liberals no longer had an overall majority in the commons so they could only get their bills passed if they got the support of the Labour party and Irish Nationalists. The Irish Nationalists would only give their support in return for granting of Home Rule for Ireland, so the Liberal party had to include Home Rule in their policy. The Liberals were reliant on the Labour Party as Labour would only support them in return for favourable legislation for trade unions, assistance for working class candidates to become MPs. This allowed the Labour Party to develop links with uniona and allowed them to field more candidates at future elections, enabling them to challenge the Liberal Party; weakening the Liberals. After the election the budget was re-introduced into parliament and was passed by both…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The liberal’s victory in the 1906 was a very significant one due to how they won it with such an overwhelming majority; it was the biggest electoral victory since 1832. In the 1890’s the liberals were suffering from a crisis identity and they were lacking in money and morale. In the 1906 election the liberals won 49.4% of the vote and that amounted to 399 seats which was such a large margin compared to in 1900 where 45% of the vote was only 183 seats. There are four main reasons arguably why the Liberals won the1906 election and these are through Conservative faults such as the massacre in the Boer war. The education act in 1902 and Chamberlain’s tariff reform campaign also lost the conservatives a lot of support, which meant people turned to liberals just due to disliking the conservatives. The most important reason was Arthur Balfour getting involved and not making the right decisions for the conservatives and losing a lot of the voters they had before. The liberals also used a very negative campaign in order to get voters to realise the flaws in the conservative’s ideals and make them vote for the liberals just through dislike of the other parties.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How successful were the Liberal government in years 1906-1914 in bringing about political and institutional reform (24)…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By the early twentieth century the Liberal Government was worried that Britain’s military capability and general military power was not as strong and it once was. Therefore, the Government’s concern over national security definitely influenced the decision for the reforms. However, there are three main factors that also need to be taken into account when deciding if concern over national security was the real reason for the reforms: the Social reasons, concerns for Britain’s Empire and the Political motive. The Social reasons played a large part in persuading the Liberals to reform. The detailed reports of Booth and Rowntree, and the evidence which was brought to light, highlighted that nearly a 1/3 of Britain’s population lived in poverty. This needed to be addressed by the Government. In addition, criticisms of the Poor Law effectively put pressure on the Liberals. The Boer War shone light on the ineffective and malnourished British Army. Britain’s embarrassing performance and recruitment in the War raised concerns over Britain’s overall military capability and the general health of Britain’s populace. In addition to this, the Liberal Government was concerned that Britain was losing its status as a major industrial power. Political motives for reform include the changing attitudes within the party, New Liberalism, the fear of the ever increasing popularity of the Labour Party and the party advantage which the Liberals would have received from introducing reform.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Labour Party growth was a key factor in the Liberal Governments desire to introduce reforms affecting children as the Labour Part was emerging as the party for the working class, a position that the Liberals had previously held. In the 1906 elections the Labour Party had gained 30 seats where previously they had held 2 after the 1900 election, between 1907-09 they also made some gains in by elections. David Lloyd George summarised the position of the Liberal Government in a speech where he said that the only way to guarantee Liberal support was through reform. This meant that through the years’ jop 1906-08 the Liberal government passed reforms that affected children as it was hoped it would guarantee support from the parents of the working class as it would be clear that the Liberal Government was interested in helping the working class. Growth of the Liberal Party also resulted in the development of New Liberalism in the Liberal Party which also contributed to the reforms for children.…

    • 690 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There was a growing awareness of poverty in Britain, especially in London in early 1900s. According to the research of Charles Booth in London, there were 25% of people that were living under abject poverty and over 35% of people were living under the poverty line of 0.90-1.05 pounds per week for a family with 3 children. The situation was severe and that was not only happening in London, but other cities as well. According to Seebhom Rowntree’s studies, there were 28% of people that lives in York could not afford to buy clothing and food. Social reform was definitely needed. At that time, some other new liberalism were arising, they aimed to give out minimum living standard for needy families. In contrast, the conservative was not doing anything good and the Education Act that did not please the society. As a result, a party that was providing more benefit to citizens and poverty became more successful and gained more voter’s…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Liberals made many social reforms which were not necessarily directly helpful to the individual issues at hand but they did create grounds for the welfare estate to be built upon and highlighted the areas which needed attention for a better minimum quality of life. Areas focused on were free meals and health checks at schools, pensions and insurances. For example, the 1906 School Meals Act allowed children to have a free daily meal. This was effective in 1914 as by then, 14 million were receiving the free meals which duly led to a better economy however the negatives outweighed the positives as the issue with having the act voluntary until 1912 meant that over half of the authorities didn’t provide meals. Furthermore, proving eligibility was very difficult so there were many errors which occurred with the system. Rather similarly, Old Aged Pensioners couldn’t receive their money due to identity proofing issues. Household issues were ignored which was one of the Liberal’s negatives however, this is without taking into account that only so many areas could have been focused on. Although the Liberals never catered for the needs of all people, their reforms managed to always bring some improvement into areas of health, education and the future of citizens, no matter how poor in places they were. The Liberal Social Reforms did improve the lives of the British citizens to some extent, the main achievement being that the existence of the reforms themselves allowed to building of the welfare estate which is a factor that makes Britain as strong as it is today.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Some historians believed the government only took little action against poverty as socials commentators Booth and Rowntree showed it wasn’t the individuals fault. Winston Churchill summed up the aim of the liberals as he said This means that the liberal government provided very little help to the lower class so that they could help themselves escape poverty. Historians alleged that it could be estimated that as much as one third of the population would have been below the poverty line before the reforms and people feel no other government could have handled the issue of poverty any better at that time which shows the liberals were as successful as they could be towards the five social groups. However The Liberal Government largely focused on specific difficulties in society but failed to introduce solutions to deal with issues such as housing or National Health Service that affects everyone. This shows that the Liberal reforms 1906-1914 were only successful on a small scale as it was unable to improve the poverty levels of the whole…

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many reasons why the Liberals introduced reforms. My first and in my opinion, most important reason why the Liberals introduced reforms was the politically motivated, political rivalries. Winston Churchill’s former party the Conservatives had already brought in some reforms, which showed the first signals for the Liberals to do so too. However, it was the newly formed Labour party which were the big competitors for the Liberals. They begun to start gaining votes and were an emerging threat. The Liberals wanted to win over ordinary people so that they would vote the Liberals instead of Labour. David Lloyd George realised that he would gain votes from the working class and would be kept in power if he introduced the reforms, as he makes clear in a speech given in 1906, ‘We must eliminate the widespread poverty which scars this land glittering with wealth, otherwise the working men of Britain will vote Labour instead of Liberal’. This quote makes it clear that one of the reasons the Liberals brought in the reforms was because of their concerns and rivalry with Labour.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It helped farmers, trade unionists, the elderly, the disabled, dependent children, the unemployed and many others who had been passed over in the social and financial shifts that occurred in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. By providing social safety nets, opportunities for work and help for the needy, New Deal not only transformed America’s economic policies, but it also influenced the nation’s political and cultural outlooks. Under Roosevelt’s aegis, Congress unleashed an era of an activist, centralized government, and, at the same time, gave its stamp to a liberal Protestant mindset that sought, unironically, the best of all possible outcomes in this best of all possible worlds. What gave political credibility to liberal forces in American during the quarter-century following the Second Word War was their ability to argue effectively that the expansion of the welfare state and the adoption of the principles of Keynesian economics were not only compatible with economic prosperity but essential to it. The postwar liberal program was based on the interdependency of social justice and business…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Perhaps, the most ‘revolutionary’ reform that Labour introduced was the NHS. Although there was liberal influence and consensus between the parties over welfare, the clear historical fact remains that Atlee’s Labour party introduced this. The public were in dire need of better healthcare – especially those who couldn’t afford it. Unfortunately, the majority of the population after the war were still living on a very small income and not many people in society could afford health services.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There was Industrial unrest, which would effect many things. The government would need to deal this as a collapse of industry would have a huge impact on the country. Another problem the Liberal’s faced was a rebellious House of Lords as a result of a Conservative majority. The House of Lords could reject bills, until 1911, which would cause problems for the Liberals and the changes they wanted to make. Both of these events could be seen as a possible excuse, as to why the Liberal Government hadn’t…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A.J Balfour was an intelligent man yet lacked political skills causing him to make poorly judged decisions leading to a decrease in conservative’s votes. During the Boer War, 1898-1902, Balfour used Britain’s patriotism to help the Tories win the 1900 ‘Khati Election’. By doing this it allowed Britain to stay involved in the Boer war, not knowing that war would last 4 years and cost Britain over 210 million pounds. This highlighted to the British people how the Conservatives neglect poverty and social reform, and by 1902 it was officially reported by the army high command that nearly two-thirds of those who had volunteered to join the services failed to pass their basic medical test. This information was further supported by Charles Booth and Seebohn Rowntree’s research, as Booth published 17 volumes on the life and labour of London’s poor between 1889 and 1903. Rowntree set out to test Booth’s statistics in York and began his investigation in 1899. Their conclusions stated that 30% of the urban population would be classified as ‘poor’ and that about 20% might be classified as ‘very poor’ or as living in ‘primary poverty’. Booth and Rowntree’s research later proved that more than a quarter of the population lived below the subsistence level, highlighting that people where too malnourished and medically unfit to be accepted into the army. Subsequently the Conservatives lost nine seats in the general election 1900, whilst both liberal and labour gained seven and two seats.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Indeed, a major reason for Labour’s victory was because Harold Wilson advocated a campaign for economic modernisation of Britain so the nation did not fall behind the excelling economies of European rivals such as West Germany. Economists raise the significant point that economic modernisation looks at the internal dynamics of a nation while referring to social and cultural structures and the adaptation of new technologies. The Conservatives failed in every social and economic aspect of this theory, as shown in 1963, as unemployment reached approximately 800,000 making a mockery of Macmillan’s, ‘never had it so good speech.’ The inability of the Conservative Party to economically modernise Britain led not only to their downfall in the 1964 election, but also to the collapse of Britain’s economy during this era. Economists point out that as a result of Conservative mismanagement of the economic sectors, Britain faced financial hardships, including a huge balance of payments deficit, which undeniably caused higher levels of inflation, causing the cost of living for ordinary British people to rise. Moreover, the economic boom of the late 1950s and the, ‘Age of Affluence,’ had reached its end, with great saturation in the markets for consumer goods. Inevitably, poor…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics