Preview

How Has Government Intervention Affect The Idea Of Civil Rights?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
868 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Has Government Intervention Affect The Idea Of Civil Rights?
Throughout history, government intervention has been a hot topic. But how has government intervention affected the idea of civil rights? In short, the effect of this intervention is negligible. Has government intervention helped to establish racial equality? It has been minimally, we can see this exemplified through countless acts, laws, amendments, and movements. Has equality been achieved and why has it taken hundreds of years to get to where we are? No, it hasn't, and it's taken so long because the only progress made has been by the people. Government intervention has minimal effect on the equality of the people these acts are being imposed on. We can see this through countless laws and acts passed by the government. Directly after the Civil …show more content…
In Exchange, the North got their candidate elected as president. This fact is unimportant to the main topic though, what truly matters is that the South, when the North withdrew, still held up the North's rules however they made some alterations. They introduced new ways to discriminate against their African American population, imposing grandfather clauses, poll taxes, and literacy tests. All of these factors helped to continue the oppression of Native American people in the South even though there was government intervention present. There are many other examples where, even through government intervention, African Americans are still discriminated against. Even with the removal of slavery, we can see this ever-present theme. The US government outlawed slavery, yet there were still means present in which African Americans could not truly be enslaved. One of these means is sharecropping. After the US government outlawed slavery, plantation owners and other landholders were struggling to find people to work their land, so they introduced …show more content…
In all cases, government intervention has had little positive effect. The government imposing new laws and ideas has always been undone by people finding their way around these laws. Every time any attempt at progress has been made by the government, we see it unwound by the people inside of that government. However, there has still been progress made, but this progress is only made when individual people stand up for their rights and start a movement. The government cannot control what its people do, but the people can control what they do. Racial equality has been strived for in our society, but like many other things, total equality is impossible. There will always be some sort of prejudice or something detracting from the idea of perfect equality. We have countless acts in place to improve upon the equality that is present, but total equality has and never will be reached. This is simply because the government, while being able to impose laws and acts which tell us what we should be doing, cannot force us to think the same way or to act accordingly. As stated previously, the government cannot control what its people do, only its people

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sharecropping was just a step up from slavery, but it allowed newly freed slaves to "somewhat" have something of their own. I say somewhat because their former master still had control over them because they had to sign a sharecropping contract. This sometimes required them to work 10 hours a day and also in harsh conditions. If the sharecropper went against the contract then it would be deducted from their pay. However, through this they were not land owners. They got paid for their work, but some of that money went to taking care of their family and the rest went to paying back debt they owe. They would ultimately in this cycle of owing because they do not make…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the cold war, the Civil Rights activist played a key role in steering the country in the right direction and maintaining the United States reputation. There are some that argue the tension between the United States and the Soviet Union may have hindered the Civil Rights Movement as both competed to become the bigger country, the Civil Rights was shining negative light on the U.S. so the United States tried to halt the movement. The United States was under fire for not giving equal right for its own citizen’s while fighting for equal rights of third world countries against the Soviet Union. Although the United States succeeded in influencing many countries, the racial struggle going on in the United States started to degrade our reputation in those countries as the Soviet Union used the racial issue to persuade the…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jim Crows laws enforced racial segregation in the south of the USA between the end of reconstruction which was during the Civil War in 1877 and also during the beginning of the Civil Rights Movement in the 1950’s. Jim Crow is a minstrel routine that was performed in the beginning of 1828 by its author. In the late 1870’s Southern Legislatures passed laws requiring separation of whites from “persons of colour” in schools and public transportation. The segregation was then extended to parks, cemeteries, theaters, and restaurants. This was to prevent whites and blacks to being equal. In 1887 to 1892 nine states (one was louisiana) which they passed laws requiring separation in public. This included railroads, and streetcars. These laws affected…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The only problem, was that African Americans had no jobs. What were they going to do for money? Where were they going to live? African Americans of all ages felt hopeless because they had no one to turn to for help (Document 2). Some African Americans ran for office. One of the most famous African American politicians was Hiram Revels. He was the first African American congressman. Other African Americans opened businesses while the rest were still looking for jobs. Meanwhile, Southern plantation owners have no laborers and laborers had no jobs. As a result, two systems emerged: tenant farming and sharecropping. Under the system of sharecropping, the plantation owner would divide his land into a certain amount of acres. Each piece of land was given to a laborer. The plantation owner would provide the laborer with food, shelter, and all the supplies they needed to work the fields. All the laborer had to do was pay the plantation owner in 50% of their crops. Between 1860 and 1880, tenant farming spread rapidly throughout the South (Document 4). The second system, sharecropping, was similar however the laborer had to rent the land as well as buy all of the supplies, food and shelter. This was a lot of money that not many African Americans…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Families who had been sold apart during the slave days were reunited. Schools and Churches were built. They acted upon the ability to organize meetings and break into politics. Ownership of land was the primary goal of many freedmen who equated land with true freedom. For the most part, the freedmen lost the battle for land but after searching for a way to live and work together; sharecropping emerged as a cooperative solution. Sharecropping was hardly to the advantage of the African-Americans but it was a chance to succeed and some…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Civil War ended in December 1865, and the slaves were free. They hoped to be treated as equal citizens who could vote, gain an education and live peacefully and equally with the whites. Many former slaves did not want to work for wages because they would still have to do what they were told by the whites. The solution seemed to lay in sharecropping, but that proved wrong. Plantation owners broke up their land into small pieces upon which the former slaves could grow their own crops. In return for seed and equipment, the sharecropper would give the plantation owner a third or a half of his crop. This was just like slavery. This would still make the African Americans go back to work at plantations. Even though slavery was abolished sharecropping was just a loophole. This was another way to force blacks back into plantations.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For many, the former jobs of slave labor of their ancestors only shifted from slavery to serfdom. Tenant farmers - also known as sharecroppers - lived and worked on their plot of land and rented from their owners. High prices for any seeds, tools, and food with half a cut of the harvest kept these farmer on their indebted land. Because of segregation, children of these rural and even urban blacks couldn’t dream of future generations having any better lives.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Having being denied education and wages under slavery, sharecropping occurred and came into wide use in the Southern United States. Sharecropping is a system of agriculture in which a landowner allows a tenant to use the land in return for a share of the crops produced on their portion of land. This affected African American families because many black families rented land from white owners and raised cash crops like cotton, tobacco, and rice. Two-thirds of all sharecroppers were poor whites and one third was black. Both groups were at the bottom of the social ladder, but with full expectations that church will restore their faith in…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While also maintaining their agrarian status, they were able to do so through convict leasing. What convict leasing allowed the South to do was maintain free labor to citizens while not violating the new slavery laws and creating a new penal system that was cost efficient. Farmers were able to continue having a work force to uphold their land and keep production going. Slaves were freed, in which most either migrated north or became criminals because of their lack of knowledge about the free world. This eventually got them into many a predicament. The majority of slaves that did not become convicts ended up working for their previous owner. Sharecropping also became popular as a contrary to convict leasing. Ex-slaves would care for and live off of a certain amount of the land lord's crops. In return they would give the land lord a measurement of the crops as payment. This system still gave whites the superiority of the mainly black ex-slave population. Another goal of the South was to not let the new population of freed slaves to become of equal social status as the public. Land lords often created a system where the ex-slave would have to give them so much of the crops grown to pay for essential needs, for example clothing or books. The unfortunate situation was that the share croppers never made enough profit to sustain themselves and once again ended upon the street and/or in debt. This resulted in a higher possibility of them becoming…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    But so many events in history have proven that we have no completely lived up to this idea of all being equal and having an equal chance at obtaining the natural given rights of being alive. Even today there are still protests of the minorities who do not have an equal chance as they would if they had been born a different race. While many advancements have been made, it seems you can still be discriminated against, no matter who you are. Centuries ago, and even now, the government has more so then not, been against the basic human rights of…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Former owners maintained control over the free African Americans. A Sharecropping Contract stated, “We furthermore bind ourselves to and with said Ross that we will do good work…We further agree that we will lose all lost time, or pay at the rate of one dollar per day,” (Foner 567). The sharecroppers were bound to the land owners by contract. This was not exactly freedom; it was slavery only in a more acceptable form. The land owners provided the sharecroppers with a part of the land and a place to live. These contracts were unfair and would continue to keep African Americans oppressed.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Populism In The 1890s

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The blacks were free, but very few could own lands. The white masters had landed but lack power over labor. To keep their ex-slaves, they came up with sharecropping. In this case, the black was given lands to rent and payback in the form of production share to the landowners. In this scheme, it was of importance to the landowners since almost all the Blacks wanted to tenant farmers while they were politically weak and economically unstable hence the landowners dictated them as demonstrated by Zieger.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The ideal of equality is one upon which the United States of America was built. Americans have long since asked themselves what exactly that means. During the Civil War, to the average Northerner, equality did not quite mean what most interpret it to mean today. To many, it meant only the emancipation of black slaves, not the rejection of segregation and prejudice against their dark skinned counterparts. The extent of prejudice of course did not end at race, but included looking down upon the poor man, thinking a woman was not capable of what a man was, calling Native Americans barbarians, and often valued lighter skinned slaves more than those with dark skin.…

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    People think that it is not possible to achieve equality because they are restrictions on the Amendments but these restrictions are on the Constitution to protect people from harming one another. Based on the Constitution, it is possible for individuals in society to achieve equality because the First Amendment, Thirteenth Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment, and Fifteenth Amendment show that people have the ability to have rights and could not to be enslaved also allowing for everyone to have the same privileges and the right to vote.…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I personally do not think the world will ever com to a point where there is racial and social equality. The world will always have people who do not think that everyone is equal and treat them harshly and get others to do the same, it is a fact of life and sadly they tend to succeed. In fox news there is a report about women who were on a train, ten were black one was white. They had gathered on a trip to Napa so they could discuss a romance novel.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays