Preview

Convict Leasing In The Early 1900's

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1203 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Convict Leasing In The Early 1900's
After the Civil War ended, the abolition of slavery created a controversy in the economic motivation of the South over work force and the penal system. However, during the 1800's a new found free labor force known as convict leasing became most popular. Convict leasing allowed wealthy families who bid the highest to lease the convict and use their labor in exchange for food and clothing. The lessee could force the convict do whatever he pleased. Even though the convicts were paying the price of their crime, they were treated very inadequately and did not deserve such harsh punishment in some circumstances. As long as the South accepted that convicts deserved to maintain this level of work just as slaves did, they would never be able to fully …show more content…

While also maintaining their agrarian status, they were able to do so through convict leasing. What convict leasing allowed the South to do was maintain free labor to citizens while not violating the new slavery laws and creating a new penal system that was cost efficient. Farmers were able to continue having a work force to uphold their land and keep production going. Slaves were freed, in which most either migrated north or became criminals because of their lack of knowledge about the free world. This eventually got them into many a predicament. The majority of slaves that did not become convicts ended up working for their previous owner. Sharecropping also became popular as a contrary to convict leasing. Ex-slaves would care for and live off of a certain amount of the land lord's crops. In return they would give the land lord a measurement of the crops as payment. This system still gave whites the superiority of the mainly black ex-slave population. Another goal of the South was to not let the new population of freed slaves to become of equal social status as the public. Land lords often created a system where the ex-slave would have to give them so much of the crops grown to pay for essential needs, for example clothing or books. The unfortunate situation was that the share croppers never made enough profit to sustain themselves and once again ended upon the street and/or in debt. This resulted in a higher possibility of them becoming

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    At first the Bureau had gave 850,000 acres to the freedmen but President Andrew Johnson later took it back and the land in turn were given to the Confederate landowners giving the blacks no choice and forcing them to work in the plantations. At first the white landowners wanted to restore gang labor but the freedmen wanted to maintain their freedom refused to sign the contract ultimately forcing the white owner to come up with sharecropping as some sort of compromise. Under sharecropping, the land was divided into a 20 to 50 acres parcel that allowed a single family to farm it. The deal is usually half of the crop to be given to the landlord in exchange for the land, housing and…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many believe that with the thirteenth amendment brought the abolishment of slavery and involuntary servitude. However, there was a loophole in the amendment, thus allowing slavery to continue. This very loophole was called the Convict Lease System. The Convict Lease System came to be in 1846 and was officially terminated on July 1, 1928. Due to the Convict Lease System, the African Americans were arrested for any type of crime, no matter how major or minor. Because they did not have much money, the African Americans would be sentenced to prison. Once the African Americans were sent to jail, they would be further sold to whoever was the highest bidder for the time of their sentence.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sharecropping was just a step up from slavery, but it allowed newly freed slaves to "somewhat" have something of their own. I say somewhat because their former master still had control over them because they had to sign a sharecropping contract. This sometimes required them to work 10 hours a day and also in harsh conditions. If the sharecropper went against the contract then it would be deducted from their pay. However, through this they were not land owners. They got paid for their work, but some of that money went to taking care of their family and the rest went to paying back debt they owe. They would ultimately in this cycle of owing because they do not make…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary: The New Divide

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages

    But, the views of both the north and the south were drastically different. It was a new life for former slave owners as now they have lost lots of their property. Also, it was a whole new experience for former slaves who now were free for the first time ever. Many former slaves had no idea what to do now because they were used to the forced labor they had to do every day. The racism in the south still lived so it was not easy for the former slaves to find new jobs. Some of the new free slaves migrated up north to find better opportunities to support themselves. Theothers still had to face hardships they faced while being property. The new practice the former slave owners used was called peonage. This new way of slavery was a way for former slave owners to try to achieve the former way of life they…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the civil war ended, the freedmen of the south needed a way to get back into the fields and rebuild the southern economy. The Congress tried to give freed slaves their own little farm, but they were not ready to run one after working only in the fields all their lives. The way this problem was solved was with tenant farms. Freemen and former slaves were allowed to work in the fields of a landowner, and in return, they were supplied with food, shelter, clothes, seeds, and equipment. I don’t think tenant farms and sharecropping was a wise way to run the farming industry after the civil war. Though sharecropping was bad for many, it did benefit some people. It benefitted landowners for several reasons. Reason number one being they didn’t…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that health care and safety are two significant changes that have occurred during the 20th century. We now have more advanced technology and more income coming into the prisons to provide efficient care for the inmate’s health issues or accidents that may occur within the facilities. Before the 20th century the death rate of inmates was extremely high, due to the fact of overcrowding and not having the means and resources to efficiently take care of any diseases, illnesses and wounds that passed through.…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Civil War ended in December 1865, and the slaves were free. They hoped to be treated as equal citizens who could vote, gain an education and live peacefully and equally with the whites. Many former slaves did not want to work for wages because they would still have to do what they were told by the whites. The solution seemed to lay in sharecropping, but that proved wrong. Plantation owners broke up their land into small pieces upon which the former slaves could grow their own crops. In return for seed and equipment, the sharecropper would give the plantation owner a third or a half of his crop. This was just like slavery. This would still make the African Americans go back to work at plantations. Even though slavery was abolished sharecropping was just a loophole. This was another way to force blacks back into plantations.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This became a new of form of slavery in the South. Many problems emerged from sharecropping. Freedmen were forced into an unending cycle of debt. They had no money to buy tools or seeds, which caused them to borrow supplies from the landowners. The plantation owners got to pick how much they charged for the supplies and what crops they would plant. This took away their economic freedom, freedmen were no longer allowed to decide what they produced to make money. The plantation owners had control over their lives because they owed them money. They influenced their decisions and limited their ability to participate in society. If the plantation owner told them that they could not vote, then they would not. This shows how their lack of economic freedom contributed to the loss of their political freedom. Therefore, this proves that It is not possible to be politically free if you are not economically…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Black slavery in the South created a bond among white Southerners and cast them in a common mold. Slavery was also the source of the South 's large agricultural wealth, which led to white people controlling a large black minority. Slavery also caused white Southerners to realize what might happen to them should they not protect their own personal liberties, which ironically included the liberty to enslave African Americans. Because slavery was so embedded in Southern life and customs, white leadership reacted to attacks on slavery after 1830 with an ever more defiant defense of the institution, which reinforced a growing sense among white Southerners that their values eventually divided them from their fellow citizens in the Union. The South of 1860 was uniformly committed to a single cash crop, cotton. During its reign, however, regional differences emerged between the Lower South, where the linkage between cotton and slavery as strong, and the Upper South, where slavery was relatively less important and the economy more diversified. Plantations were the leading economic institution in the Lower South. Planters were the most prestigious social group, and, though less than five percent of white families were in the planter class; they controlled more than forty percent of the slaves, cotton, and total agricultural wealth. Most had inherited or married into their wealth, but they could stay at the top of the South 's class structure only by continuing to profit from slave labor. Planters had the best land. The ownership of twenty or more slaves enabled planters to use a gang system to do both routine and specialized agricultural work, and also permitted a regimented pace of work that would have been impossible to impose in free agricultural workers. Teams of field hands were supervised by white overseers and black drivers, slaves selected for their management skills and agricultural knowledge.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    African Americans enjoyed little personal freedom or security once the civil war ended due the criminalization of African American life and the violence committed against African Americans as a reminder of their inferior status. Law enforcement arrested African American men, women, and children on frivolous charges and sold them into slavery to work for the new industrial industries of the South. Also, those arrested worked on chain gains. Once held in captivity, it was near impossible for the prisoners to escape or even survive some of the ill-treatment and abuse received by prisoners from the overseers. Moreover, There is the perception that pre-Civil War slavery was better than post-Civil War slavery. During pre-Civil War slavery, masters had invested in the slaves and would not punish their slaves as severely, whereas with post-Civil War slavery, there was no issue to arrest an unsuspecting African American to replace a dead prisoner.…

    • 190 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Treatment and punishment towards prisoners during the 1900’s for their beliefs was extremely unfair and some unnecessary. Men chose to fight for what the belief in and do what they thought was right but received endless jail time and cruel punishment. Three men specifically whose names are Philip Grosser, Robert Lipscomb, and Morton Sobell. They all had their way taking action in what they believed in but were punished. Standing up for what you believe in should never come at cost where you lose your rights as an individual.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Populism In The 1890s

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The blacks were free, but very few could own lands. The white masters had landed but lack power over labor. To keep their ex-slaves, they came up with sharecropping. In this case, the black was given lands to rent and payback in the form of production share to the landowners. In this scheme, it was of importance to the landowners since almost all the Blacks wanted to tenant farmers while they were politically weak and economically unstable hence the landowners dictated them as demonstrated by Zieger.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the United States, the Black Codes were laws passed by Democrat-controlled Southern states in 1865 and 1866, after the Civil War. These laws affected and restricting African Americans' freedom, and of compelling them to work in a labor economy based on low wages or debt. Secondly sharecropping was stopping them from being truly free. After the Civil War, former slaves sought jobs, and planters sought laborers. The absence of cash or an independent credit system led to the creation of sharecropping.High interest rates, unpredictable harvests, and unscrupulous landlords and merchants often kept tenant farm families severely indebted, requiring the debt to be carried over until the next year or the next. Laws favoring landowners made it difficult or even illegal for sharecroppers to sell their crops to others besides their landlord, or prevented sharecroppers from moving if they were indebted to their landlord. This is why slaves weren't truly…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Not only were they the driving force of the southern plantation, some slaves were even allowed to produce some of their own produce to consume, or even sell in some circumstances. Some of the crops that they grew were tobacco, and indigo. Slave owners typically didn’t mind letting slaves tend their own crops, some slave owners felt that if they were spending their free time growing plants for personal use, then they aren’t conspiring to flee, or cause trouble. African Slaves became strong traders in Louisiana, many slaves were sent from their plantations to sell goods on their owner’s behalf. They would go to towns such as New Orleans, and mobile to sell meats, vegetables, and milk.…

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The foundation of correctional law and the start of the correctional system goes back to the seventeenth and eighteenth century in England. In the seventeenth and eighteenth century it began as hospice facilities which were institutions that promoted the idea of isolating offenders from each other. There were also had houses of correction which emphasized the importance of hard work at disagreeable tasks. The 1779 Penitentiary Act found that prisoners should be housed in secure and sanitary facilities and that those facilities need to meet a specific set of standards. These standards begin with having fees for basic needs and services, should be abolished, the discipline should follow the reformatory regime.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics