How Is Life Affirmation

Can we consider this silence as his affirmation? This is an issue that should be explored separately. I think it is ultimately difficult to attain a totally empirical or totally virtual and exhortative reading of eternal recurrence in Nietzsche's thought. But, our focus is on the consistency of this doctrine, life affirmation and life meaningfulness in this eternal return. He emphasizes that if the eternal recurrence is a thought experiment, one can and should affirm the life and life affirmation is not inconsistent with the eternal recurrence. Life affirmation offers the possibility for meaning of life in such a world, with no metaphysical-theological supports. I noticed that determinism is the very fundamental problem of this doctrine, which
I would say that every repetition may be meaningful for admonition and instruction, but is it the same for the participants/agents? One would respond that if there is a purpose hidden behind it, then it is meaningful. Nietzsche opposes the very idea for it causes that all actions and life per se, be defined as the means of ends, that go beyond the life are nothing but thinkers' and philosophers' revenge for their comprehension of the inevitable submission to the past. Not only philosophers, but also artists have ultimately perceived the necessary incapability of pushing the boulder of the past; thus, they cling to the meanings beyond life that resulted in missing the life it-self, including all its joys and pains. If we think of good and evil in each of our deeds, we find actions as means that will result in postponing our real life for the sake of a truthful hidden life behind the actual one. Our objection to life as a mean will give meaning to the eternal return and if we can speak of the meaningfulness of eternal return, then we can also speak of life affirmation. The problem still exists in the meaningfulness of eternal return, as such. If it appears convincing and have a meaning, the life affirmation would be coherent with