Preview

How Religious People Perceive Each Other's Points Of View

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
294 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Religious People Perceive Each Other's Points Of View
How do Religious people and Atheist people perceive each other’s points of view? Do religious people accept atheists or see them as enemies of “GOD”? How does not believing in
God create tension and sense of mistrust between religious people and atheist? I would like to investigate and learn what religious and atheists people think of each other using interactionist theoretical perspective. Interactionist perspective mainly focuses on how people interact with each other from simple everyday conversations people have between each other, to them being influenced by those interactions. Another perspective could be used and that is conflict theory.
The conflict theory could also work because most religious people can never accept someone
…show more content…
I do believe that in this case the best perspective to be used is interactionist, as it focuses mainly on interactions between individuals. This perspective applies here as we can learn what influences religious people to be hostile towards atheists, and vice-versa. Do religious people believe that having the belief in “God” gives you morals that can only be acquired by believing in him, and for that reason atheists have on moral values sense they don’t believe in “God”? Do

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Swindal offers four models for the interaction of faith and reason. One of these models is particularly of interest here: the incompatibilist model. This model suggests, “…one can hold faith as transrational, inasmuch as it is higher than reason.” A second tier of this model is that faith can be irrational; hence, it is “not subject to rational evaluation at all” (Swindal, n.d., n.pag). The rationale behind having faith in God is that it binds together the common, or universal values and moral codes that are present in all cultures (Rachels, 1971, p. 621-22). Having said this, though, many who do have faith in God do not think that it requires any reasoning or any proof at all (Clark, n.d., n.pag.). In his discussion, though, Clark refers to…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    if they do not believe this statement, has it in their understanding that if their was a God, it…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Interactionism is an action approach which views society in a micro perspective. It argues that the definitions of deviance and normality are social constructions and are relative, meaning it will depend on a range of factors such as the time, place and social context in which the act takes place whether the behaviour is defined as a crime or deviant.…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Believing in a spiritual entity or a supernatural supreme being can play a role in one’s moral beliefs, but it is not necessary. The argument will start with breaking down what it is to be moral with the definition of moral, which is “of or relating to principles of right and wrong in behavior,” (ethically speaking) “conforming to a standard of right behavior.” (Merriam-Webster, 2011) With that in mind now, one can be moral and not believe in GOD, because it is up to the person to choose to be moral, hence “To be, or not to be…” This argument will consist of a brief history in a few religions, church and state, moral education, ethics, and Plato 's and Aristotle 's take on living morally. Again, believing in God is not necessarily needed for one to be moral; all that is needed is good ethics, belief in oneself, and knowledge.…

    • 2355 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Divine Command Theory

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Morals mark actions as good or evil but the genesis of these morals is an enigma. Some credit God with establishing the morals that must be…

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Assess the view that religious beliefs and practices are changing to reflect a new era of diversity and choice…

    • 190 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some people have different beliefs and may believe strongly about those beliefs. Atheists do not believe in any gods, some, like Muslims for example, don’t call him God, rather Allah. Those who refuse because of their beliefs are subject to ridicule. And even then, some people who have different beliefs may be too shy because of this, and give in to the peer pressure and do something they don’t think of as right.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As a young child I blindly accepted what I was told and believed that to be moral and to be a good person I needed a higher being in my life to guide me, but as I got older I learned that to be a good person and to be moral all I had to do was be a good and moral person.…

    • 2862 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Craig objects to grounding morality in the natural world because in the natural world it is more about survival of the fittest. Craig compares humans to animals, who only act on animal nature.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Christian Worldviews

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Competing worldviews are breaking out everywhere especially throughout North America. Two sides with vastly differing and incompatible worldviews are being locked in a bitter conflict that permeates every level of society. On one side of the battle is the Christian worldview, and on the other is the Humanist worldview divided into three branches: Secular Humanism, Marxism/Leninism, and Cosmic Humanism. It’s in this essay that we will seek to understand all of the three Humanist worldviews while presenting a strong, honest, truthful, intelligent defense of Biblical Christianity. As believers in and followers of Jesus Christ, we need to consider how our commitment to Him affects not just our political and ethical convictions, but also the way…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nietzsche: Morality Essay

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Have you ever asked yourself where your conscience comes from? The feeling that takes a hold of you when you do what you feel is wrong. This feeling is almost like a consequence when you tell a lie or commit a crime. Your conscience helps you sort out the good and bad and feels your mind with sorrow when you see a sad story on the news or gives you the initiative to donate money to a contribution. But where does it come from. Is it something you are naturally born with, taught over time or given to you by a higher power? This argument leads to the existence of moral values by many philosophers including William Lane Craig. One of his excerpts argues that if there is an existence of moral values, which some people agree, then there is the existence of God. He explains, "God provides the best explanation for objective moral values in the world. If God does not exist, then objective moral values do not exist." Craig says that even the most influential atheists of our time agree with this argument but then in order to avoid God's existence they deny that objective moral values exist. One of these atheists is J.L. Mackie who along with others explains that moral sense is a natural product of biological and social evolution. And the great philosopher Nietzsche is also one to disagree with Craig's argument. However, even though Nietzsche and other philosophers provide many examples that help go against this argument, William Lone Craig has proven that the existence of moral values exist and therefore proves the existence of God.…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Youth Crime

    • 1863 Words
    • 8 Pages

    According to McClelland (2009), interactionists focus on the subjective aspects of social life, rather than on objective, macro-structural aspects of social systems. Unlike functional theorists, Interactionists focus on the human being rather than the society as a whole. Functionalist and conflict theorists focus mainly on a macrolevel analysis, while symbolic interactionist approaches are based on a microlevel analysis. George Herbert Mead and Herbert Bloomer are accredited thinkers in contributing to this theory. They believed that society is the sum of interactions of individuals and groups and that symbols are created to represent something meaningful. Understanding these symbols that are created will help understand human behavior. This perspective focuses mainly on our actions as human beings and how those actions can be interpreted in society. This is explained further by, the process is further aided by our ability to think about and to react to our own actions and even our selves as symbolic objects. Thus, the interactionist theorist sees humans as active, creative participants who construct their social world, not as passive, conforming objects of socialization ( McClelland, 2009).…

    • 1863 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mba Erp Notes

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * Interaction with other areas of the system, gives you a 'clear' view of the customer…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Surrendering to the torment of daily encounters with the mind, along with being open to transforming experiences for increased options for the experience of life, threw open the door to the world of deliberate, inter-religious dialogue. At the time, the excitement of participating in inter-religious dialogue was similar to passing under the Golden Gate Bridge and casting that first glimpse at the vast expanses of the Pacific Ocean, the curvature of the earth, the horizon, and the infinite spaciousness. Very simply, my inter-religious dialogue reflections were nothing short of awesome, and the vision was of limitless occasions for learning from another and for self-knowing and self-seeing. The initial experience of inter-religious dialogue during…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Inter-Religious Relations

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Religion and faith are an essential foundation of life for many people around the world. It provides them with strength and optimism in difficult times as well as self-peace. Religion also assists in creating self-discipline and boundaries. Religion also happens to be a powerful contributing factor in violent conflict, sometimes due to misunderstandings of religious differences; therefore it is essential to include religion and religious individuals in diplomatic efforts. Interfaith dialogue is an extremely prevalent response to religious conflict and religious freedom. It is not intended to be a debate, but instead it is aimed at mutual understanding and problem-solving. Interfaith dialogue brings individuals of diverse religions together for extensive discussions about various religion-based topics. These programs serve peaceful objectives within the perspective of religious faith. There are countless interfaith dialogue programs worldwide with different settings, agendas, methods, participants, and outcomes; however, they all generally have the same common goals of inter-religious communication, tolerance, and peace.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays