Preview

How successful was Lord Liverpool's government in responding to Popular Discontent in the years 1815 to 1820?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1025 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How successful was Lord Liverpool's government in responding to Popular Discontent in the years 1815 to 1820?
How successful was Lord Liverpool’s government in responding to Popular Discontent in the years 1815 to 1820?
Lord Liverpool’s government faced popular discontent in the years 1815 to 1820 due to various social, political and economic factors which led to the majority of the British Public wanting a change. A change in government, government policies and a change to overcome the mass unemployment they were suffering from as a direct result of the end of the Napoleonic War, industrialisation and urbanisation. However, despite the widely held view that amendments – in favour of the working class – were needed, no such change came about in the years 1815 to 1820. Lord Liverpool’s government was partly responsible for this as it introduced a number of repressive policies to prevent the people from revolting; however it is argued that the main reason for the lack of change was due to the disorganisation of the radical opposition.
At the end of the Napoleonic War, Britain began trading with Europe once again. This worried the farmers who were afraid that the importation of foreign corn would lower prices. As a result, the British landowners put pressure on the House of Commons to take action and protect their profit and were successful, resulting in the Corn Law being introduced. This applied a tax to all foreign wheat imports unless they reached the domestic price of 80 shillings and was viewed by the industrial class as a way in which the government was protecting the rich landowners – and paying no regard to the working, industrial class majority. The introduction of this law made things incredibly hard for the poor who were already struggling to feed their families and suffering from unemployment, furthermore manufacturers were affected by this law as their workers began demanding higher wages. As well as strikes, the Corn Law led to food riots all over Britain and was the reason many middle class moderate reformers began joining in to the call for change.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Radicalism from 1812-22 was a serious threat to Lord Liverpool’s government. However, due to draconian legislation and fiscal policies Liverpool was able to counter and contain the radical threat that proved to be a constant thorn in the side of a government fresh out of one of the biggest wars Europe had ever seen.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    parliament thought that they had the right to tax the American colonies. “The Sugar Act was an extension of the Molasses Act (1733), which was set to expire in 1763”. In 1756-1763 Great Britain had a 7 year war with France and after the war ended Great Britain had high war debts so they started taxing the colonies. The American colonies got upset about the extremely high taxes so they revolted against Great Britain.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1846, Britain repealed the Corn Laws, which made sure that the wheat and flour shipped into Britain from Canada had low taxes. This decision was made because Britain wanted to create an environment of free trade to reduce the cost of importing goods from other countries. Due to the Corn Laws being repealed, the British government became less reliant on Canada for their exports of raw resources. This led to a depression caused by the Canadian economies focus on exporting instead of manufacturing goods. People thought that if they created a government between all the Canadian colonies, it could make a policy that solves their economic crisis.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1812, after the Napoleonic wars, Britain was left in a state of great economic depression and was in debt of around £834 million, despite moral being high after Victory against Napoleon. Lord Liverpool and his government faced the momentous task of carrying Britain through a time of depression but also keeping up with the vast industrialisation that was spreading across the country.…

    • 755 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is argued by some that Peel was greatly successful up to 1841 due to the fact that he brought the Tory Party from being a “beleaguered minority” (Adelman, 1989) to being a strong, relevant power once again. However, this ‘low point’ of 1832 is often greatly exaggerated by admirers of Peel. Arguably the high levels of support that the Whig’s received in the election of 1832 was predominantly down to the fact that they advocated the issue of Parliamentary Reform, meaning that it can be argued that the period of unpopularity that the Tory party suffered in 1832 could only ever have been temporary. Arguably even if Peel had not advocated the policies which many consider to be very ‘successful’, the fortunes of the Tory Party would have still recovered, as many of the newly enfranchised voters, far from punishing the Tories, enjoyed the exclusivity of Parliament and wanted to retain that exclusivity through conservative policies. Although the skills of Peel as an orator did contribute to the Tory revival to a certain extent, the Whig majority in Parliament was so fundamentally fragile that it hardly needed exploitation by Peel. Although Peel did contribute to disuniting the Whig majority by, for example, exploiting the Whig difficulties in the management of Anglican Church funds in Ireland, the opportunity to do so arose spontaneously, and merely needed to be…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Corn Laws Dbq

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    cheaply abroad), agreed with the farmers about the probable results of free trade while disagreeing about their desirability. Industrialists wanted to repeal the Corn Laws to increase foreign consumption of British manufactured products; if foreigners were allowed to sell grain to Great Britain, they could earn the foreign exchange to buy British manufactured goods. Agricultural elites, by contrast, saw repeal of the Corn Laws as a direct threat to their interests because the trade barriers kept the price of the grain they produced artificially high. The Anti-Corn Law League was the first modern and national-level political pressure group to emerge in Britain. It began in London in…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The French and Indian War put the British crown in debt. In order to increase revenues for the costs of defending the expanding British Empire, Britain taxed the colonies. It imposed the Sugar Act in 1764, and, one year later, it added the Stamp Act. Colonists protested the added taxes. The Stamp Act was repealed.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government’s economic policies had also caused discontent. First of all the Corn Law was introduced in 1815 which was to block all foreign corn from being imported into the country, this was done to protect the price of wheat in Britain, as in the time of war farmers did very well and they had lot of demand but not enough supplies to give out. The government simply wanted the landowner to have the same profits as they had during war. There was discontent because of the Corn Laws as there were riots and petitions against it. Another policy introduced was that Income Tax (pay tax on how much you earn) was abolished which did not affect the poor but the rich instead however and the…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The French and Indian war brought an economic despair for Great Britain, they were in were in debt due to war expenses. Prime Minister of the time, George Grenville, started applying acts which made life for the people harder. The first act was the Sugar Act, which made a bigger demand on the sugar imported from the West Indies, and an increase on taxes on sugar, wine, etc., this caused the colonists to boycott and smuggle good. Also along came the Currency Act, which prohibited the colonies from issuing paper money. The currency act angered the colonists because they already had a trade deficit with Britain, and this just made it worst for them. Another act that caused economic problems was the Boston Port Act, which closed the Boston harbor, and ships were not allowed to come in for any business. Many colonists were deeply affect by the economic problems in the colonies, it made some poor and disallowed others to flourish in their economic status.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Some historians believed the government only took little action against poverty as socials commentators Booth and Rowntree showed it wasn’t the individuals fault. Winston Churchill summed up the aim of the liberals as he said This means that the liberal government provided very little help to the lower class so that they could help themselves escape poverty. Historians alleged that it could be estimated that as much as one third of the population would have been below the poverty line before the reforms and people feel no other government could have handled the issue of poverty any better at that time which shows the liberals were as successful as they could be towards the five social groups. However The Liberal Government largely focused on specific difficulties in society but failed to introduce solutions to deal with issues such as housing or National Health Service that affects everyone. This shows that the Liberal reforms 1906-1914 were only successful on a small scale as it was unable to improve the poverty levels of the whole…

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sugar Act of 1674); which was to repay the loss of money from the French and Indian War (when the British showed major weakness; why did they need the money.)]. In the Colonies, the taxes were opposed due to its negative economic effects and also increased enforcement, which did hurt smuggling activities. In 1675, Grenville enforced the Stamp Act (stamp taxes levied on documents, paper goods, and similar items.). The reaction to the Stamp Act wasn't pleasant. People formed the Stamp Act Congress, repealing the Stamp Act (which eventually repealed the Stamp Act in 1766.). At this point I thought the British would stop this nonsense, but as usual I am wrong. It was then the Townstead Act, taxing everything (including tea). I was at the signing…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The 1790’s wasn’t the easiest of times for Britain. Revolution overthrowing the monarchy in France caused working-class civilians in Britain to entertain the idea of revolutionizing. This, among other aspects such as the war with France and food supply, meant that Britain, led by Pitt, had to fight off the threat of revolution. It would be a fair statement to make that although Great Britain had big enough threats and factors for revolution to actually happen, the threat lacked a certain spark that could have ignited the revolution, spreading into a full-blown fire across the whole country, helping end the monarchy.…

    • 2322 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    1867 reform act

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It could also be argued that not only was the government being pressured into reform by these groups but it was scared of the repercussions and outbursts that could follow if the act was not passed. During this time Britain had gone through many difficult times such as , economic depression, a cholera epidemic and quite high unemployment. This would make the government anxious about the current temper of the general public and therefore wouldn’t want to upset them. An example of the public unrest would have been the Hyde park riots of 1867, where railings were ripped off windows were smashed and there was great uproar. This is then…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Great Corn Laws Debate

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Great Corn-Laws Debate presented interesting view points between the protectionists and proponents of free-trade. The protectionists argued that Corn Laws would help stabilize commodity prices which in turn would help Great Britain continue to prosper and provide security to their citizens. By protecting the agriculture industry through protected prices the thriving manufacturing sector would have customers to buy their output. Given their numerous wars with France, Protectionists also argued that Great Britain had some public debt that would need to be repaid and this would be done primarily through taxing the farm land. Since the landowners taxes would be going up the stabilized commodity prices…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Italian Unification

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages

    rulers would still have been opposed to greater unity. In the 1820-21 and 1831 revolutions they did not…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays