Preview

How a Ruler Ought to Govern His State

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1017 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How a Ruler Ought to Govern His State
Francesco Petrarch (1304-1374) was an Italian scholar, poet, and early humanist during the reformation of the Renaissance period. He was one of the greatest poets of the 14th-16th century, and is regarded as the father of the humanist movement. Petrarch was a prolific writer. Not only was he known for poetry in Italian and Latin, but also hundreds of letters, essays and histories. Like Dante, a generation before Petrarch wrote in a vernacular style to bring Italian a literary language. In this letter, Petrarch offers advice on how to rule as an effective leader. He uses various examples and sources to support his theories of how a good ruler should rule by laying out a good model. Petrarch emphasizes the first quality of a good leader should be friendly to the good citizens. He believed that nothing was worse for the state than to use fear and cruelty to maintain power. He used the case of the barbaric emperor by the name of Maxminus, claiming that it is far better for a lord to be loved than to be feared. He also advised the ruler to love the subjects like one’s own children. Next, Petrarch emphasized justice so that each person gets what is due, and no one is punished without a good reason.

He uses the Apostle Paul from the Bible and how the sword should only be used if necessarily and not foolishly. He stresses the strengths and gratitude that can be gained when one presents himself as friendly and not terrifying. The author goes on to use Caesar Augustus and Nero, two men that fell under the title “father of your country “even thou only Augustus can truly hold the title honestly, all the while Nero was both enemy of his country and his religion. The author also uses God, the Heavenly Judge and Eternal King of all. He expresses how we all can have sin in our lives and are weakened by our own self-willingness and all are in need of mercy. Petrarch uses the Aristotle, a great philosopher, to give advice on how one should govern or rule

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A Machiavellian society is ruled by a princedom in which peasants worked most of the occupations. Nobles did not perform any physical labor. And the military is strong and follows the prince. In a Utopian society there is a community of senior phylarchs who discuss state issues. Everyone spends time in the farmlands for two year periods. The Utopians despise war and at all costs do not get involved in war.…

    • 514 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Francesco Petrarch: father of humanism. He learned Latin to study classical works, especially those of Cicero. He coined "Dark Ages".…

    • 1950 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leaders of countries or Princes must make decisions that not many will agree with, but are the best for the populace and he must make them, no matter the cost. Niccolo Machiavelli uses logos, ethos and distinct clear diction to prove the necessity for a ruler to be able to make unpopular decisions, in an excerpt from his book “the Prince” (1532).…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Emperor of China and Rome’s Augustus Caesar both helped shape their kingdoms into great empires, but their tactics in doing so are every different. The First emperor of China took a more direct approach to his leadership. He concurred all the land around him and changed many laws to restrict his citizens from freedoms. Augustus Caesar was considered a peoples person and often attended live shows and plays. He believed that thru peace and harmony his country would be able to thrive. These great leaders both achieved dominance and power throughout their leadership but only one of them died as a hero while the other died as a hated man. In this paper I will compare and contrast the ways these leaders shaped their countries and the effect it had on the way their people viewed them.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Life experience, culture, language, time of living and many other factors affected Lao Tzu’s and Niccolò Machiavelli’s views on how an ideal leader ought to govern a country. These views, expressed in their texts, reflected on how these writers perceived the fellow men. Lao Tzu is a Chinese philosopher and founder of Daoism. He is the author of a philosophical document called “Tao-te Ching”. Niccoló Machiavelli, is a 15th century aristocrat and a writer, mostly famous for his political treatise, “The Prince”. This essay will attempt to analyze both authors’ views on human nature and the way these views affected the types of government supported.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What is justice? Today, where it is common for people to only look out for themselves, justice is an extremely important tool. But what exactly is justice? What is right, what is wrong, and who decides that? To find an accurate definition, we as a society should not just focus on one opinion, but the views of many. Similar to how our society is today, the society in The Republic, lived the same, struggling to determine what the correct definition of justice was, and how to pursue the right answer. In the paper, I will be discussing all aspects of Plato’s Republic, including the Philosopher King and his nature, and justice in that time.…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nacirema Research Paper

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As a supreme monarch I, Frederick William the Great Elector, should be the active leader of Nacirema. In my times I was the best ruler and I made many of accomplishment in my life. Besides all the other candidates that is running against me, I believe I will be the only one who can make Nacirema the best of nations in the world. There are many of reasons why I would be the best ruler of this nation and I will highlight two accomplishments that I completed that should allow me to obtain the position as a ruler. One reasons why I should receive the job as a ruler is because I have past experience of ruling over countries. Equally important, while being the ruler over Brandenburg, and Persia the people declared it as the best times of their lives because of the new things I have brought into their lives.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Poop

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages

    2. What made Petrarch aware that a renaissance, or rebirth, of classical learning was necessary in his time?…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Legacy

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The citizens’ power to elect representatives for the Senate, originated during these leaders’ reigns. A strong President, much like a Greek king or Roman Caesar, must provide the stability and leadership required during times of crisis. While Alexander espoused democracy for the people he conquered, Julius infused western civilization into the territories he acquired. Thus combined, they provided a new form of supremacy to the people that served as a basis for many leaders. In this case, the more powerful and effective leadership is portrayed by Julius Caesar not only because of his redesign of politics, but also his advances in military and cultural achievements.…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Qualities of a Prince

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Machiavelli’s “The Qualities of the Prince” gives the idea of what makes an all around good ruler. He wrote guidelines touching several topics such as war, reputation, generosity, mercy, and cruelty. All of these topics preach words on how to avoid being hated but still keep power.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Enlightened Despots

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Enlightened despots believed that political change could best come from above, from the ruler. However, they were encouraged by the philosophers to make good laws to promote human happiness. How did these monarchs differ from earlier unenlightened monarchs of the past? The difference lay in tempo. These new despots acted abruptly and desired quicker results. They were impatient with all that stood in the way of their reforms. In addition, they justified their authority on the grounds of usefulness, not divine right. These new monarchs were rational and reformist and they regarded political change as possible and desirable.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the chapter assigned, Machiavelli asserts that it is not only acceptable, but necessary for a ruler to go back on his word if his previous promises place him at a disadvantage. In this paper, I will argue that the purpose of this passage is to persuade readers of the notion that being a good leader many times involves actions that would not be considered “good” as such. Then, I will use examples from the text to explain how this falls into Machiavelli’s overall themes of efficiency and pragmatism, and how this makes for a logical method of ruling.…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    A decent ruler must understand that it’s better to be feared than loved. With fear comes control, and rulers can use the fear they installed into their subjects to keep them in order. Just like how Robespierre terrorized the French to keep them under his control, a ruler must be feared, so he’ll have his subjects dreading the punishment to come after committing a crime. Cesare Borgia, for instance, was seen as a cruel ruler, but this cruelty united the people of Romagna to make the kingdom more peaceful and orderly (Machiavelli, 77). Being loved by the people should be a ruler’s last concern because then he’ll find himself being seen as a friend rather than a ruler.…

    • 1353 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Perfect

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the republic, Plato tried to imagine and make a most perfect just society. He argues that wisdom, which is based on truth, judgment, and reasons of a person, would make a just person and a just society, which would bring peace to the world. In his ideal society he believed that people would live harmoniously and there would no be violence. He divided the population of the society into three divisions or levels – the producers with bronze sash, the soldiers with silver sash, and the rulers with golden sash. And for each level he designated different types of education. The people were given their appropriate rank through the process of examination. He believes that, each person has his or her own area of expertise, which they can focus on. In his view a society is just in this manner, where people does only their designated roles and they do not interfere with the roles of the others. They keep their own boundaries in the society. His ideal government was an aristocracy. He believed that both men and women have the same souls and interest. The rulers with the golden sash are the philosophers, who have the wisdom to rule in order for a society to survive. They are the ones who have the knowledge to direct the society for benefit of all. The soldiers with the silver sash, upholds the authority, they are educated in both physical training and culture. And the producers with the bronze sash provide for themselves and for others. The people in that society, does not know who are their biological parents. He argues that they must treat one another as a family. They must look after each other as brothers and sisters. Having that argument for him means that there would be no violence among the people.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Securing power and order of a state has been the focus of ancient political philosopher Niccolo Machiavelli’s writings. His most famous writing “The Prince” fortified his untraditional views on how to successfully rule a state. He recognizes through his realist views, that human nature causes a need for any degree of violence required to maintain power, and order in a state. This paper will expose how Machiavelli viewed violence as a necessary, yet moderated tool in order to rule a successful state. The paper will prove this by examining Machiavelli’s approaches to acquiring, maintaining, and defending a state, in his book “The Prince.”…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays