Human

Human development is a response to globalization, recognizing that it has affected the whole human society. In that sense, it is essential to understand globalization as a process integrally bound and transformer. From this fact, the human development paradigm is evolving is an option that links the person in the center, consequently establishing an inseparable relationship with full human rights and opens the space for the construction of citizenship based on ethics as central to development thinking. This raises the ethical responsibilities. Under this context, policy analyzes, read political class, the role of the media from the perspective of an ethic of citizenship. Finally, we present the final remarks aimed at elucidating the road to development ethics.
Equity and equality are two principles closely related, but different. Equity introduces an ethical principle of justice or equality. In short, equity forces us to consider the objectives that we get to move toward a more just society. A society where equality of a society is absolutely unfair, since it does not account for differences between individuals and groups. And at the same time, a society where people are not recognized as equal, neither may it be fair.

Today, the growing inequalities in our planet in access of countries and people to use and enjoy the resources, leads to raise equity objectives as substantial development.
The behavior of societies and the living standards they reach are increasingly affected by the performance of both large corporations as programs arising from policies carried out by the State. In the task of achieving the common good begins to discuss the traditional view of the social contract, it would be not only the state but also the corporations that would address social problems.

This scenario raises the need for the applicability of ethical standards for those who make decisions that have a high impact on the common good, whether in the context of private and public institutions. The impact of the activities of large corporations in economies where out their activities creates a new demand to socially responsible behavior for both companies, and the government should encourage it

Ethics and Globalization
Globalization "is a buzzword. Almost every step of talk about it. That if the international financial flows, international trade if that if multinationals, that if immigration. Many of the social phenomena that affect us maintain a more or less close relationship with globalization. Often we hear of the globalization as a promise of new opportunities. And often, too, we hear about it in a critical way, and even angry.
Globalization, as we know, has raised much criticism of many social movements, known under the name of "anti-globalization movement."
This name is rejected, by the way, many of the protagonists of these movements, which aim to remedy the negative effects of globalization, but not are against the very idea of globalization. In the words of Susan George, a qualified representative of this movement, in an article published in the journal Dissent
(Winter 2001, vol. 48, n.1): "I reject the word globalization means that communication on us. The combat is given, in fact, among those who want a inclusive globalization based on cooperation and security, and those who want to all decisions being taken by the market. "
It is not, therefore, to fight against globalization, but against this form globalization concrete. Thus, some speak of the need for globalization social rights, other than the need for planetary ethical values, other than a theory on planetary justice help balance the growing inequality, the other supranational agencies need to monitor financial market flows
Overall, other than promoting participatory democracy. In short, all suggest a globalization conducted from greater global solidarity. This seems to be a struggle must polarize much of the efforts of our time.
1. The necessary utopia
Changes are always preceded the reality of the fact that someone, or some have dreamed. New forms of human relations in the political, social economic and can only be built if we recover the ability to imagine alternatives, new ways of living and organizing our world. Are needed, therefore, new utopias to emerge from pessimism, the "nothing to do ..." Recall some proposals of philosophers: Marxist paradise, the ideal community of communication, the natural state, the hypothetical stage with the veil of ignorancia1. Utopias that have served mankind to improve living conditions, to address social problems time. Christians must recover the "heaven", not as an escape, but as "horizon eschatological "horizon critical of present realities and at the same time horizon hopeful that attracts us. Imagine a better world is the first step to improve world. However, despite the essential force of utopia, we should not discard the factor "fear" as motive for these changes, or as pre sensitizer changes. Not a "fear" crippling, but a "fear" that is prudence, which impels us to deal with the problems. Like it or not, major ethical statements have been set after major disasters. The Declaration of Human Rights, 1948 took place after World War II, or statements on research ethics medical humans, after realizing the atrocities that Nazi medicine conducted in the camps.
2. Structures bad
In our world, we find evil structures that promote injustice. Such structures often surpass us, they appear as large "monsters" who are not know where to attack. I say "monsters" because these structures remain blurred, without a visible head and clear, but with countless "tentacles" that reach everywhere. These large structures perpetuate injustice and seem to have power over people. They are like new forms of "divinities of evil." This perception, rather widespread, leading to a radical pessimism: "there is nothing to do." This structures idolatry causes must be addressed not know how to change them. This is the time to remember the fact that these large "monsters" that have escaped our control are creatures built by people of flesh and blood like we. Hence, structures are not absolute, almighty.
And yet, small acts of solidarity and justice done in one day day, they build solidarity structures where it tends to perpetuate and increased. What we do, however small, has an impact, whether aid to build justice and solidarity as if going in the opposite direction. We wonder: is important to recycle household waste? Maybe it is a small act isolated, with little impact on global ecology and current planet but helps us make consciousness and others do, too, the same thing that helps governments to see that the people take the problem seriously ... In our world, it takes gestures, prophetic signs that break with the dynamics contrary to solidarity. So important are that detect movements and dissatisfaction, while proposing concrete alternatives to address specific problems. However, many of these movements lack comprehensive proposals to change the prevailing models social, economic and political.
3. A change of mindset
However, in order to build a more caring world, where there is no exclusion ever, it is important first, a change in mentality. This new thinking will go operating, perhaps, only in some people, but it will become a seed that will solidarity multiplying everywhere, showing that things can change. Furthermore, very important that we realize that we are not alone on this journey, and that the small changes are possible, because it is possible to detect that things begin to change, to
Despite contrary dynamics.
These changes begin to appear as small seeds in the middle of a world realities marked by a total lack of solidarity and injustice. First reaction to this, many simple facts are created inside our minds societies. At the same time, we find, in our society, forces opposed to greater solidarity and seize every opportunity to stoke the logic of insolidaridad. For example, the events of 11 September in the United States, if at first time raised concrete gestures of solidarity with the victims, then have led to a defensive reaction by the West. And so, the press and governments fill their mouths with the terrorist threat and measures to combat it, forgetting to
Often, that terrorism is a sign that our world does not work well.
Another example: the arrival, to Western Europe, a large contingent of people from Africa causes fear reactions, outbreaks of xenophobia, but not seems to seriously question ourselves about the fact that the African continent has been marginalized by globalization, and its population reaches the North seeking that of which that the North already has, as vested in the social field.
Thus, solidarity is appearing within a structure unsupportive.
It should be way to overcome the inertia and "inevitabilities" that the system created to perpetuate itself. It is building a "new mentality". and ethics
However, when we talk about "globalization of solidarity", becoming socially effective all those values, we should consider the need to seek some agreements between all men and women, in order to implement measures and social policies to achieve greater global solidarity. The world of values is the world of ethics. Therefore, we should consider the need for a
Overall ethical frame or, in other words, a minimum shared ethics beyond ethics particularistic. How can we understand, in a world that has become small, without an ethical framework that is common to us all?

How to provide citizenship education
Citizenship education in building peace and peaceful coexistence in our society, based on the conviction that the current world evolves and changes at a rate previously unknown, so constantly educating ourselves and learning is a necessity, individual and social. Consequently, renewing content and knowledge of the world, especially in Peruvian society, lifelong learning is necessary to recharge the spirit and morale. Unfortunately, despite the advancement of science and technology, continuing wars and structural violence which is no stranger Peru. Refresh and revive the commitment to teach values, build competence as peace and peaceful coexistence has to be a compromise and not to lose task force, requiring the concurrence of wills of citizens in the search for solutions to violence and inseguridadpública growing perception now.

Households and public and private schools have an inescapable obligation to become involved as decisively assimilate that Education is the action and effect of giving optimal parenting, teaching and instruction for children and adolescents to become impregnated with the elementary and basic rules of courtesy, civility and securities, whose end result is to obtain future citizens with the critical capacity, autonomy and rationality in social ethical conflict situations, in this sense, the State dedicated to promoting policies and reforms consistent, plausible and logical that satisfy future citizenship education.

It is important for our community regain strength and moral in homes and schools to educate regardless of gender from kindergarten, primary and secondary, future citizens, with duties and with rights, with emphasis on both poles, committing ourselves to know pass on to our children and students that they need for meaningful social transformation of life, convinced that our commitment to their society is a factor of personal growth and fulfillment. Actually, from the stage corresponds paternal family educator support conceptual knowledge and attitudinal plant to achieve a culture that supports and promotes civic peace processes and peaceful coexistence in every geographical spaces of the country.

Education in our country is in charge of the executive branch through the Ministry of Education. It is free and compulsory in educational institutions and public universities. Children and adolescents are an educational process according to evoluciónfísica, affective and cognitive, in their different educational levels established by law for each case. Despite the time elapsed and educational policies and reforms promoted and implemented by the State, has not had the desired effects arising in the minds of Peruvians the question: who or who are the real and true responsible for sustaining citizenship education for peace, prevent violence and values education for development in our society?

We must remember that during the Millennium Summit (18SEP2000) and World Summit 2005, representatives from 191 countries, including Peru, reaffirmed as Millennium Development Goals: "Goal 2: Achieve universal primary education. Ensure that all boys and girls complete a full course of primary schooling. " "Goal 3: Promote gender equality and empower women. Eliminate gender disparity in primary and secondary education preferably by 2005 and in all levels of education by 2015."

However, currently we are silent witnesses that education in our country has lost its way, has fallen into the indefinite and forgot their primary objective: the formation of the moral ethical personality. Initial and permanently, this formation are principal and inescapably, to the family, without avoiding responsibility to the school, the media, the public space in its entirety. Therefore, premium, return to values as respect, coexistence, effort, equity or fair use of freedom, allowing main purpose is to promote the development of free people and integrity through the consolidation of esteem, personal dignity, while it is vital that home and family-school professor, responsible future citizens to form their own judgment, respectful, participatory and supportive, incidiéndose assume their civic duties and develop habits for citizenship effectively and responsible, and also they know their rights.

Values education is a priority to prevent violence, corresponding to the home and school and the authorities responsible for the national Education Sector, regional and local levels, make proposals that enable transformative curriculum work from the family and in the classroom, with children and adolescents in essential respects as: mediation, solidarity, dialogue, respect for difference, equality, justice, learning to live together and resolve conflicts peacefully, and learn to be conscious citizens, responsible, active and solidarity on the coast, highlands and jungle of Peru.

We must also include the Peruvian public and private universities throughout the national territory and, in the teaching of values, believing in my humble opinion in two respects: 1. - The academic, scientific training gives college vocational training for students of the Peruvian population, and 2. - Persuading and instill in training the concept of values.

Finally, it is at the highest level of education (Ministry of Education, Regional Education and Educational Management Units), design and run from the challenge posed by the size of the country, Peruvian cultural politics of education in values, putting special emphasis on socioeconomic and demographic differences between disparate regions and communities of different ethnic and cultural roots, in this sense, I believe that this would be an appropriate way of democratic development based on participation, equality of opportunity, fairness, Learning should not be relegated to a subject or limited their practice within the classroom. Only then would build a more just and fraternal society.

Values education to build peaceful coexistence and civic school

Inevitably images observed daily television appearances how elated parents accompanied by their children and young children preventing the normal academic school, threatening to take local and vandalism attacks against the school property and the lives and safety of teachers, should not be met their demands. These parents violate the constitutional duty to "educate their children and to participate in the educational process" within the channels of understanding, respect and enforcement. Another of the images, work stoppages and strikes are prolonged and unending by teachers affiliated to SUTEP, who under pretext of labor demands and economic-times mostly intolerant and away from all prudent and reasonable context, frustrated and hurt by weeks and / or months of teaching, training and continuity of the academic school year, events that most of times the media magnify, alienating our educational community's use of mechanisms for peaceful coexistence, social communicators forgetting his undeniable obligation as participation "in the moral and cultural formation of the State".

These images that are experienced daily in many of our schools, public educational institutions generally, illustrates and reflects the culture of violence that is prevalent throughout the country. We see, hear and read daily variety of social phenomena intimately connected: firearms trafficking, rape and sexual harassment of minors, sale and consumption of drugs and alcohol, gangs, family violence, in particular, a widespread climate of polarization, intolerance and hostility, but we do not want or do not realize that we have gradually entered a growing globalization of violence, the same that prevails today and wildly lacerates our social nerve. Faced with this dilemma are woven proposals to implement and promote a repressive and punitive response, not preventive. As you see our schools do not escape this violent reality, being rather a micro universe of this crisis, therefore, we have a joint-government training work, home, school, community and civil society in the search-live peacefully together.