Preview

Human autonomy as inconsistent with the belief in the Christian God

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
340 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Human autonomy as inconsistent with the belief in the Christian God
Hampson defines autonomy as “self-law”, and as inconsistent with belief in a Christian God (Hampson, pg.1). She makes the case that autonomy is dependent on the ability to “live in one’s own time, think one’s own thoughts, and come to one’s own conclusions” (Hampson, pg. 14). She argues that Christian’s are unable to do so because of the historical nature of the religion. However, if one considers autonomy as defined as exerting “free will”, then there is room to believe autonomy and a Christian God are not at odds.

Hampson’s premise focuses on letting one’s own law rule, while obedience to another implies heteronomy. She bases her argument on origins of one’s thought. She notes that because of its structure, Christians come to know God through the revelation, which serves as a normative reference point. Because of the culture of the time of reference, a patriarchal influence is imbued on both the structure and message, which by default, leads to a dependency.
I believe Christians can exert autonomous thought. While Hampson argues that self-law comes from within an individual, she also acknowledges God, as she defines “God is one with all else that is” (pg. 16). Christians espouse The Holy Spirit indwells. Hampson would suggest that God’s voice is but one, of equal value to one’s own. Christians would argue it is superiority to own. Both suggest the ability of a power to influence us.

In Hampson’s model, individual’s “truths” guide choice; in Christianity, faith in beliefs do. Cobb (pgs. 64-65) points out, “the Bible depicts God as having great power, but it does not deny some power to creatures as well”. Christianity does not imply the lack of “free will”. Cobb states, “the indwelling does not replace or displace something of the self what would otherwise be there. It enriches the whole” (Cobb, pg. 73). Autonomy in this case isn’t about questioning the value of God’s Word or its influence, but that a Christian God does not remove choice.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    David Entwistle's (2010) Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity appears to be a text with a primary audience which appears to be conservative evangelical Christians. The basic ‘meat’ of the book is the premise that "weaving together perspectives from psychology and Christian theology can help us understand and appreciate humanity more fully than we could with either perspective alone" (p. 3). Entwistle’s view is that in faithful reading of both the book of God's work (nature) and the book of God's word (theology), this textbook seems to be the work of an individual whose true request is for a form of psychology that is aimed at the treatment of the total patient, mind, body and soul. "Christian understandings of personhood, the purpose of human life, our need for God, and the ethical teachings of Christian faith," Entwistle argues, "are integral to psychology, not merely parallel to it" (p. 199). By making his opinion clear throughout several sections within the text Entwistle is projecting his position on the subject of integrating theology and psychology very clear.…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    including “psychologist and neuroscientists” ( Tierney 1), deny free will and concludes that they believe that as “an excuse to behave as one likes” ( Tierney 2). Moreover, he states that there are believers, who believe that people have control over their actions. Tierney uses life examples…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Damned Women: an Analysis

    • 1820 Words
    • 8 Pages

    this chapter, I will explore the underside of covenant theology in both the perpectives of men and…

    • 1820 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Worldview Analysis Paper

    • 1682 Words
    • 7 Pages

    [ 3 ]. Gregory A. Boyd and Paul R. Eddy, Across the Spectrum: Understanding Issues in Evangelical Theology, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, MI.: Baker Academic, 2009), Pg. 112…

    • 1682 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    73 Evans, Manis). However the argument itself if just a mere introduction into what “God” is or rather who “God” might be. Evans and Manis hint to this in their final paragraph. McCloskey’s version of the argument is misguided in the notion that each individual argument is to be pulled apart singularly or that they cannot relate to form an over arching theme that “Gods” existence is dependent upon many facets. One may look to the “The Absurdity of Life Without God” article when defending this frame of view. That without “God” and the necessity of existence humanity is just a happy accident that is riddled with a meaningless purpose. Though personally the purpose of life and the existence of “God” are not relatable other than the fact they are ideas and existential questions asked only to attempt to “prove” the cause of unexplainable events or…

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human beings are creations from God, created from the image of God. Humans are formed as temples of Gods. Humans are controlled by their minds, and they daily emotions. Humans do have free will, life after death will depend on their own free will choices. “ quote here “…

    • 1071 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Frankfurt, H. G. (1971, January 14). Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person. The Journal of Philosophy, 5-20.…

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Cone

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Christian theology is a theology of liberation. It is a rational study of the being of God in…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Reston, James. “A Russian at Harvard,”. . Solzhenitsyn at Harvard : The Addresses, Twelve Early Responses, and Six Later Reflections .Ed. Ronald Berman. Ethics and Public Policy Center, 1980. 36-38. PDF…

    • 1651 Words
    • 48 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Integrative Approaches

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The foundation of our worldviews is based on how we were brought up and the society we were raised in. Our worldviews affect everything, the way we live, the way we think and the way we react. This book helps us understand our worldview assumptions and provides a roadmap to determining what we base our assumptions on. We need to have an understanding of Psychology and Christianity if we want to effectively integrate the two. (Entwistle 2010) discusses epistemology, which is the study of knowledge and belief. Epistemology introduces 4 ways of knowing: Internal Dialogue, Interactive, Investigative and Interpreting God’s Word. Epistemology allows us to keep questioning that which we think we know.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Christian Worldview

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages

    References: Cosgrove, M. (2006). Foundations of Christian thought: Faith, learning and the Christian worldview. Grand Rapids: Kregel Publications. Samples, K. (2007). A world of difference: Putting Christian truth-claims to the worldview test. Dartmouth: Baker Books.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther’s contributions to the Reformation and to the field of psychology influence society even today. His emphasis on personal experience over institutional practice not only changed Christianity but also encouraged understanding one’s self and one’s personal experience. While I personally disagree with Luther’s position on free will, I greatly appreciate his momentous contributions to Christianity and psychology as I, as a Christian and psychology major, wholeheartedly embrace the evangelical Protestant…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An example for both Autonomy Thesis and Divine command Thesis would be “Can God make…

    • 231 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Christian Leadership

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Human “character”, is the pattern of thinking and acting which runs right through someone, so that wherever you cut into them, you see the same person through and through [1]. The transformation of a person character is their virtue. Virtue is what happens when wise and courageous choices have become “second nature [2].” Wright differentiates a biblical framework from a Greek moral framework in that Jesus and his followers are offering the three-dimensional model toward Aristotle two-dimensional points [3]. Wright gives us excellent contrast between biblical and Greek moral framework and I agree with his positions. For example, Aristotle felt for someone to establish character they have to continually practice their strengths, he saw that the ultimate aim was to become the kind of character who would be able to act in the right way automatically, by the force of long training of habit. Jesus and Paul agreed; but they proposed a very different way by which the relevant habits were to be learned and practiced. Also Aristotle saw that for one to be completely happy they needed moral strength called virtues, whereas Jesus and his followers highlighted qualities that Aristotle didn’t rate highly such as love, kindness, forgiveness [4]. Evaluate Wright’s position and note where you agree and/or disagree with him. Defend your positions.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Open theism is a theological movement that develops within post evangelical and evangelical protestant Christianity as a response to certain ideas in relative to the formation of Christian theology and Greek philosophy. I concur with McCormack assessment. Open theism is a belief that God doesn’t exercise timid control of the universe instead He leaves it, open for human to make choices that are meaningful and that affect their bonding with others and God. Open theists in addition believe that this would mean that God does not know the future entirely. Proponents concur that the Lord is Omniscient but refuse that this means that the Lord knows everything that will happen. McCormack argues that open and classical theists have a problem namely inadequate Christology thus offering Barth as a counteract. McCormack concludes, ‘’There is absolutely no winner in the debate between classical theists and open on the basis of the Old Testament scriptures. Progress can’t be made until each side start to take Christology more seriously. It’s time for evangelists to more seriously take their declaration of the deity of Christ and commence to think about God on a complete Christology basis.’’(McCormack)…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays