Preview

Human Cloning Is Wrong

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
450 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Human Cloning Is Wrong
Human cloning is the creation of a copy of another human being without involving sexual reproduction. It is sometimes called human reproductive cloning. Human cloning is one of the serious problems in this world. Actually, this problem is prohibited by the law and God because its process against God’s will which is creating human without eggs and sperms. Moreover, it brings a lot of disadvantages and bad effects for us as the human. Those are the reasons why human cloning is wrong.
First, there are many reasons why the law does not allow the people to do human cloning. Human cloning will make this world crowded by the identical human. You can imagine that if human cloning is allowed then the people around you are cloned. You will find a lot of same people in your life. Then, there will be many misunderstandings and problems about the same thinking because the copies of the human will have the same characteristic, appearance, and the way of thinking. Furthermore, it is not proper by God’s will. Based on the bible, babies are born from men and women and it means babies are born from the reproduction between men and women with their eggs and sperms. So, human cloning is prohibited by the law and God.
Second, there are a lot of disadvantages and bad effects of human cloning such as emotional risks and improper wars. For example, a baby is born by cloning without parents, after going to school and being in class with his classmates who were born normally, then imagine what the child fell about himself. He will ask why he does not have parents and how he could be born. This is one of the disadvantages of human cloning as emotional risks. There is a small group of people who want to destroy a country such as terrorists. Because they do not have enough people, they just clone themselves couple times in order to get enough people to destroy the country. Then, you can imagine that will be many copies of same human who are used for war. I call this an improper war which is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    On the other hand, there are quite a few cons that potentially outweigh the pros of cloning humans. The first con is that human cloning is unnatural. According to Lombardo, “many feel that interfering with the natural process of pro-creation would lead to other attributes of life being altered” or displaced from society. Many people are opposed to this issue due to their religious beliefs, because they feel man will be replacing the higher being as the creator of creatures on this Earth. In a scientific point of view, using an older cell to create a new organism could possibly cause an “imprinted age [to] be place on the growing embryo”, resulting in faster aging (“Pros and Cons of Human Cloning”). Lastly, because human cloning is a roughly…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cloning is a process in which an organism or cell is replicated. Cloning should stop because it is not natural, it is wrong to force specific results. Cloning causes animals to live a shorter amount of time or be born with LOS causing permanent damage. What is not natural should not be forced especially if the results are…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    · Cloning would also deal with killing embryos. You might not have known, but Dolly, the sheep that was cloned in 1996, was one of over 200 sheep embryos and hers was the only embryo that survived. The rest died or were thrown away. Imagine if the failure rate was that high when we started to clone humans. More than 200 embryos, the start of 200 human beings, would die for the sake of just one embryo that would have the same DNA as some one else (LiveScience.com 2009).…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the years, science and technology have expanded to make it possible to create identical creatures. While new cloning technology is a great advancement, it raises a plethora of moral and ethical questions. Cloning may bring about new ways to find cures for babies, according to Philip M. Boffey, but cloning also “could usher in a new eugenics”. The problems produced from the prospect of cloning greatly outweigh the benefits.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cloning is a procedure conceived to notion in the late 1960s, but it is only recently that it was fully understood and that scientists have started to figure out how to successfully copy the genetic composition of one organism to another. Since science already knows how to do this, the only problems and obstacles that remains is efficiency and the success ratio of each operation. The cloning process consists of taking the nucleus of an organism, and placing it, along with the DNA that contains all the genetic material, in place of the nucleus of the host egg. The egg then forms an embryo and matures into the same exact "copy", at least genetically, as the original organism. Already done on mammals, cloning is something that can be extended to utilize humans as subjects. In the future it will be wholly possible to create human clones to serve whatever purpose they were conceived for. However, presently there are numerous ethical issues surrounding cloning and there are problems about the implications of the use of cloning for the purpose of medicine. This issue plagues us so much that the constant objections of bioethicists and political and religious leaders have caused the US Government to propose a ban on all research concerning human cloning until a conclusion is reached on the moral and ethical aspects of the process. (Macer, 2)…

    • 1585 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Human Cloning? Don't Just Say No," written by Ruth Macklin, a professor of Bioethics, discusses the negative responses people have regarding human cloning. As the title says: "Human Cloning? Don't Just Say No," Macklin believes that cloning deserves a chance to be developed in humans. Though there may not be any substantial benefits to human cloning, nobody has presented a persuasive case that cloning is harmful either.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Animal Cloning

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cloning is useful on a bacterial level for doing all sorts of science related to DNA. Bacterial clone libraries are kept with every gene we find. Cloning on a larger scale would allow us to produce an organ transplant without worry of rejection from the host. Whole animal cloning is only useful for people who want the same looking pet they had that died or maybe you had a good steak and you wanted to clone that cow. The possible impact of cloning is improving the overall standards human beings. Cloning will do a lot for medical research. It will also challenge people’s ideas about life and about themselves. Disadvantage of the use of cloning are adding clones to the population would make things worse, world would eventually explode. Benefits of the use of cloning such as medical emergencies for an example if someone needed a heart or someone needed something donated or replaced. Cloned genes are also used to produce drugs, insulin, clotting factors, human growth hormone, and industrial enzymes. In 1952 scientists transferred a cell from a frog embryo into an unfertilized egg, which then developed into a…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    revloution

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I think cloning is bad because if we genetically alter clones and develop people to be perfect beings then there will not be diversity and there will be problems because people will be choosing selected genes to make the perfect child. Everyone will have the same bodies and diseases will kill a lot of humans because they are all the same. Cloning is also a big moral issue because the concept of making people could interfere or disrupt people’s beliefs and religions.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The question shakes us all to our very souls. For humans to consider the cloning of one another forces them all to question the very concepts of right and wrong that make them all human. The cloning of any species, whether they be human or non-human, is ethically and morally wrong. Scientists and ethicists alike have debated the implications of human and non-human cloning extensively since 1997 when scientists at the Roslin Institute in Scotland produced Dolly. No direct conclusions have been drawn, but compelling arguments state that cloning of both human and non-human species results in harmful physical and psychological effects on both groups. The following issues dealing with cloning and its ethical and moral implications will be addressed: cloning of human beings would result in severe psychological effects in the cloned child, and that the cloning of non-human species subjects them to unethical or moral treatment for human needs.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Science Gone Wrong

    • 936 Words
    • 3 Pages

    With so many enhancements in medical science, cloning is slowly but surely looking like it could be in the near future. However, is it really an option that should be considered as a way to extend human life? There are a number of negatives involved with reproductive cloning. According to udemy.com, “95% of animal cloning has ended in failure due to genetic defects, and cloning is considered unsafe because of it” (Quinonez). Frankenstein or The Modern Prometheus written by Mary Shelley goes along very well with the statement that science can go too far. In the book Victor Frankenstein created a monster that he later regretted creating him. Many believe that cloning is against God’s wishes because the clones would be created by man. Man would be playing God and create people that are unable to feel and empathize. There is also the belief that these clones would be created without a soul. Whatever peoples view on cloning…

    • 936 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cloning could provide many advantages but includes many risks like the possibility to start a whole new war. An army of clones could be created which means other counties would have to follow. Cloning should still be legal because it could help people even this risk.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is Cloning Wrong

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages

    By cloning embryos, it is possible to further medical science, assist people with physical diseases, and doesn't actually focus around cloning a human. To begin with, cloning can be used in the form of cloning embryos to further the field of stem cell research. For example, in the article “Cloning Embryos: Scientific Milestone or Moral Offense?”, it is stated that, “Stem cells taken from adults, though less morally questionable, are less likely to grow outside the body and are not as versatile as embryonic stem cells”. This asserts the idea that although cloning embryos seems wrong, they would not become fully developed humans and instead would be used to help the lives of those with disabilities and medical problems. Stem cells are cells that have the…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Human Cloning

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages

    John A. Robertson's article "Human Cloning and the Challenge of Regulation" raises three important reasons on why there shouldn't be a ban on Human Cloning but that it should be regulated. Couples who are infertile might choose to clone one of the partners instead of using sperm, eggs, or embryo's from anonymous donors. In conventional in vitro fertilization, doctors attempt to start with many ova, fertilize each with sperm and implant all of them in the woman's womb in the hope that one will result in pregnancy. (Robertson) But some women can only supply a single egg. Through the use of embryo cloning, that egg might be divisible into, say 8 zygotes for implanting. The chance of those women becoming pregnant would be much greater. (Kassirer) Secondly, it would benefit a couple at high risk of having offspring with a genetic disease choose weather to risk the birth of an affected child. (Robertson) Parents who are known to be at risk of passing a genetic defect to a…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thesis Statement: Although human cloning is a scientific discovery of great significance which is the creation of a genetically identical copy of a human it has some medical advantages; however, it raises high debates because of its religious, ethical, and scientific disadvantages.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should Cloning Be Banned

    • 604 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A further reason why cloning should not be banned is that thousands of lives are saved from cloning human cells, tissue or organs. Regenerative medicine, a growing scientific field, allows this cloning to take place. Cloning human body parts guarantees a genetic match to prevent organ rejections and doesn’t require drugs that lower the body’s immune response. If human cloning is fully banned, this type of research would be stopped and a lot of lives would be lost.…

    • 604 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays