Preview

Humanities Exam 4

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1634 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Humanities Exam 4
Humanities 101: Exam 4
June 11, 2012
1. Johann Sebastian Bach (J.S. Bach) is considered to be the father of music for many reasons. He was the greatest Baroque composer, arguably the greatest composer of all times. He developed the modern piano lessons we use today, and developed helping book to strengthen both hands equally to play the piano. He wrote thousands of compositions, and simplified the way we compose music. He is the reason the piano became popular over the harpsichord. He was brilliant and innovated the way we read and see music today.
2. An oratorio is the musical setting of a long sacred or epic text; it is performed in concert by a narrator, soloists, chorus, and orchestra. Like operas, oratorios are large in scale and dramatic in intent but, unlike opera, they are produced without scenery, costumes, or dramatic action (72). This is comparable to the “Baroque sensibility” because the purpose of Baroque composers music was to create visual pictures in people’s minds through the music, and that’s what you would have to get from an oratorio.
3. The Catholic Counter Reformation had a vast impact on the arts. Art now, instead of focusing on the content of the picture, it became important to focus on the style in which the subject was painted. You now have sculptures like “The Ecstasy of Saint Theresa”, which vies on the cusp of sensuality, something not allowed in the Catholic Church at that time.
4. It was very important in the African and Native American cultures to maintain a balance between likeness and resemblance in a figure because they believed that if it resembled a person too much that it could capture and trap their soul. They believed that a likeness to the subject was okay, it could be known it was a male or female or animal, but you should not be able to tell who exactly it was.
5. Absolutism is the divine right handed down by God for someone to rule as king/queen through birthright. Versailles was the embodiment of Louis the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    To make a long story short, Louis XIV tried to have power over everything and everyone possible, including the clergy. Absolutism became a well-known term during this period and basically was a political theory that sought to ? encourage rulers to claim complete sovereignty within their territories.? As an absolute monarch you could ?make laws,…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolute Monarchs were eithere kings or queens who controlled the complete way of life in the country they ruled. Absolutism is the rule of one person over any given thing. The two rulers that showed absolutism in the documents are Louis 14th and Peter the Great. They were both absolute monarchs and both ruled over large territories.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    7. Which of the following pairs correctly identifies the subjects illustrated on the Royal Standard of Ur?…

    • 494 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ on Absolutism

    • 553 Words
    • 2 Pages

    European monarchs in the seventeenth and eighteenth century viewed themselves as absolute rulers, or kings and queens that believed that they controlled everything within their state's borders. The people that were ruled by the absolute rulers believed absolutism had a different aspect than was being used by the kings and queens. This practice is known as absolutism. The people that were being ruled and the ruler or absolute monarch viewed the role of the absolute ruler differently.…

    • 553 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Humanities Module 5

    • 539 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kublai Khan was a ruler during the thirteenth century. He was a Mongol dreamer, visionary, and had the desire to unite different nationalities, religions, and cultures together under the Yuan Empire. Kublai Khan was a great sympathizer for the Chinese people, even though he was Mongolian by birth. He didn’t necessarily always trust the Chinese people, but he was fascinated with their traditions, culture, and arts. Conservative Mongolians would get offended and would repeatedly cause Kublai Khan problems because conformed so well to the Chinese ways. Kublai’s grandfather was the infamous Genghis (Chinggus) and the fourth son of Toluia and Sorghagtani. From the day he was born on 1215, his mother, Sorghagtani, raised him because his father was away on military campaigns. Kublai’s mother had one ambition for all of her sons, and that was for someone to regain the throne that had been taken by her husband’s brother. Consequently, she groomed Kublai and his brothers for the throne. She was a fervent Nestorian Christian and saw that plundering a nations resources would soon backlash, and she knew it would not be helpful to anyone. She obviously had a great effect on Kublai. When Kublai Khan’s eldest brother, Mongke (Mangu) gained the throne, his mother’s life dream was fulfilled. She never lived to see Kublai become khan as she died a year after his brother ascended the throne. While demonstrating his military brilliance during several battles he caught his brother’s attention. His brother recruited and gave him a job in his empire. Same years later Mongke died during a battle between the Buddhists and the Taoist. At the time there was a bloody power struggle between Kublai and his younger brother Arigboge that lasted for two years. Arigboge was defeated in 1264 and Kublai became khan shortly thereafter. Kublai Khan did some amazing things during his reign including extending the Grand Canal all the way to his new capital in Ta-tu, what is now modern day Beijing.…

    • 539 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. No. He stated, “ ‘Progress’ is merely a modern idea, that is, a false ideal. The European of today is vastly inferior in value to the European of the Renaissance: further development is altogether not according to any necessity in the direction of elevation, enhancement, or strength.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Johann Sebastian Bach in my opinion was one of the best composers in the Baroque era. Sebastian had many complex songs. He was considered a master of polyphonic music. He knew how to blend the different voices together and how to make them both distinct.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    absolutism - a form of government in which all power is vested in a single ruler or other authority…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    a. Absolute monarchs were rulers who had all the power within the land they ruled.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Humanities Test

    • 4627 Words
    • 19 Pages

    1. ( T or F ) Aristotle considered plot more important than character or thought. True…

    • 4627 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is hard to imagine going back in time 500 years ago, however, I’m sure how so many 500 years ago from right now felt too, hard to imagine, right? There is so much that has changed in the last 500 years, it is nearly impossible to imagine what life was like there on the ground floor of 2013. They say that hindsight is 20-20, and I think that a couple words that would describe the current age would be hedonism and selfishness. 2013 was time where people wanted to do whatever pleased them most without any consequences. They cared less about other people than they did the environment and protecting their own feelings from every little thing. It was a time when everyone felt as though they either were or should’ve been an exception to the rule, which rule? Basically any and all of them. It had become a very partisan time, and those who didn’t fit into the liberal mold were cast aside, ridiculed and thusly their integrity was stripped from them unduly. It was a time where up was down and down was up, people were venerated for bad behavior and those who chose to do the right things were treated like criminals. Everyone wanted to take from the system and upon receiving it would turn around and bite the hand that fed them. People are wanting more and more from their government and giving less and less back to it. This is becoming dangerous close to a serious financial breakdown. This was a time of entitlement; so many people seemed to feel that they were due something from just about everyone regardless of whether or not they deserved it, or earned it. This is just perspective from a humble historians opinion, but 2013 was definitely backwards in time.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cultural Studies 1st Exam

    • 1576 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Identifications (Write the correct terminology or name in the space provided by each statement. Some terms may not be used.…

    • 1576 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Is The Baroque Era?

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The counter-reformation was The Catholic Church’s response to the Protestant Reformation. The church fathers emphasized art rather than textbooks since most of the faithful were illiterate. Church leaders believed that the purpose of religious art was to teach and inspire the faithful.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Exam 1 Philosophy

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages

    John Hospers is a twentieth century philosopher who believed that man’s actions are not determined by freewill, but by the unconscious mind. Hospers believed that man was not free to make choices, but predestined by his past experience and it’s influence on our unconscious development.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Philosophy Exam 2

    • 1455 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Earnestly, Descartes ponders over the course of Meditation IV how an all-powerful and seemingly benevolent God could allow man to believe errors and falsehoods. In Meditation IV, Descartes compared God to a master craftsman, so wouldn’t it seem that his craft would be without mistake. Undoubtedly, Descartes is befuddled by the concept of sometimes believing in falsehoods although he was created by an infinitely perfect being, isn’t believing in falsehoods supposed to be a bad thing? If that is the case then who is to blame? However, Descartes perceives that it would be impossible for God to deceive him and would neither desire too because God is simply perfect in all ways. God had given a faculty that would not lead man to error as long as it was used correctly, thus it is the fault of man for believing in falsehoods. In my notes, the understanding is summarized as when one chooses to believe a claim that does not have sufficient evidence then one is to blame for rushing to judgment. In a perfect world, it would seem that man should never fall to error because of the faculty given by God, but continuously we give rise to an infinitude of imperfections. Descartes further presses on to understand why God allows falsehoods or flaws innately within man that lead to error; he attributes it to two things: faculty of understanding and faculty of free will. Because we can choose to question, seek answers, believe in what we want to believe, that is the reason for error. Descartes says that he does not question the mysterious ways of God, although he does seem to ponder his actions for these faculties alone testify to the tenacious and insatiable curiosity of man. At the end of Meditation IV, Descartes comes into an understanding about his perceptions since he had discovered the source of falsity and error that for as long as he is diligent of will and restraint within the bounds of his own knowledge, he will never be deceived. I do…

    • 1455 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays