European monarchs in the seventeenth and eighteenth century viewed themselves as absolute rulers, or kings and queens that believed that they controlled everything within their state's borders. The people that were ruled by the absolute rulers believed absolutism had a different aspect than was being used by the kings and queens. This practice is known as absolutism. The people that were being ruled and the ruler or absolute monarch viewed the role of the absolute ruler differently.
As document number one states, Frederick II of Prussia said, "The sovereign stands to his people in the same relation in which the head stands to the body." This quote means that absolute ruler, Frederick II of Prussia, believed that the absolute ruler was the head or leader of the group of people he ruled. This means that he believed that the absolute ruler was the one making the decisions like the head of the body and the people would be following like the rest of the body. This stands for the way he views absolutism should be practiced.
As document 3 says, St. John Bayle stated that King Louis XIV "took great pains to be well-informed of all that passed everywhere; in public places, in the private houses, in society and familiar intercourse. His spies and tell-tattlers were infinite." This quote defies the character of Louis XIV as a spy to his people. This meant that he could not trust any of his people do anything without his knowledge or consent. He believed that absolute rulers had the power to not only tell the people what to do, but also had to tell him what they were doing. If not tell him, he would still know.
As document 4 determines, the nobles that were ruled by the absolute rulers did not like the way they were treated. As the report of the Commission of Enquiry states, the peasants believed that the absolute monarchs were destroying the empire and countries by taxing the peasants and keeping them on leashes. The kingdoms were falling due to its base, which are the peasants since the entire kingdom is built on their foundation. They are the ones that pay the taxes and work for the higher classmen. The absolute rulers tax them and the kingdoms foundation crumbles due to this.
As document 6 points out, the people, in this case Russians, are enslaved and worked as animals on a farm. They do not complain out of the respect and love to their masters. Yet, there are people that believe that the absolute rulers do not have the power and authority to control their native people in such manners. They do not have the right to overwork their people and not pay them or feed them. Many peasants and people believe that that sort of actions should not be allowed and the absolute monarch should not perform these actions on his own people.
The above documents and arguments lead to one and only one conclusion. That conclusion is that absolute rulers or absolute monarchs and their subjects or people view the proper role of an absolute monarch very differently. The absolute rulers believe that they are allowed to do anything they please because of the fact that they are absolute rulers and the people believe that the absolute rulers have to be limited.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
To make a long story short, Louis XIV tried to have power over everything and everyone possible, including the clergy. Absolutism became a well-known term during this period and basically was a political theory that sought to ? encourage rulers to claim complete sovereignty within their territories.? As an absolute monarch you could ?make laws,…
- 455 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Write a short paragraph that summarizes the opinions of the pro-absolutist group of documents. Pro-absolutist believe the king should have no limits to his power and all the focus of the monarchy revolves around him. “His qualities are incomparable.” The king doesn’t need Parliament consent to make or declare a law. All the respect and honor goes to him alone; he was like a hero figure.…
- 311 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
In addition to asserting greater control over the nobility, monarchs of the 17th and 18th centuries also took initiative to consolidate their power and secure absolutism by fielding large standing armies. The security presented from these armies ensured that the rulers had a higher chance at consolidated political absolutism. Rulers such as Frederick William the Great Elector of Prussia and the Habsburg ruler Maria Theresa both built large standing armies to defend against foreign militaries, which both of them were challenged by throughout the earlier years of their reign, and consequently, to stabilize power through the absolutism an efficient army presented. The need for a powerful military was evident to Frederick William of Prussia since the start of his rule in a disjointed kingdom. From 1655 to 1660, Sweden and Poland fought each other in the second Northern War across the Great electors' holdings such as East Prussia, however; Prussian defense was not adequate to confront this…
- 2606 Words
- 11 Pages
Good Essays -
in what they want to. In absolutism everything that was done revolved around the king and…
- 573 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
They hoped to gain power by sanctioning the monarch. Bands of fighters, led by nobles, terrorized and plundered the lower classes around the country in an effort to deteriorate the king's authority. Eventually, they hired Spanish troops to carry on their fight, even though Spain and France were presently at war. Although the movement failed, it left an enduring imprint on the general public as to the worth of having a commanding monarch to safeguard them from things in analogous nature to the revolt. When the Cardinal died in 1661, Louis XIV, whom Cardinal Mazarin had been governing for a while, took supremacy. Louis XIV became the absolute, resilient ruler that France had been looking for to reestablish order in France. Louis XIV took hold of the country and put himself at the head of government. An excerpt from Politics Drawn from the Very Words of Holy Scripture states, “Without this absolute authority, the king could neither do good nor prevent evil. His power must be such that no one can hope to escape him”. It also states that, “Royal power is absolute”, and, “All the power of the individual subjects is united in the person of the king” (Bishop Jacques Bossuet). The Estates General was never called together, and most of the…
- 949 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Absolutism is the idea that one ruler is responsible for an entire empire for everything. More simply, they have control of everything. Absolutism became especially popular in the 1500s with events that were caused because of it. Absolutism has social, political, and religious effects on every-day lives of people and governments, not to mention the unhappy nobles. Absolutism has always been something tha t leaders try to achieve, but either it doesn’t last long or the leader does not achieve full absolute power.…
- 729 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
During the 16th and 17th century Europe, political views on the government varied in Europe. After the Catholic Church’s downfall, absolute monarchs dominated Europe. An analysis of the documents clearly shows that mostly kings favored absolutism and have superiority over their people. On the other hand, some viewed absolutism as a power that made people inferior to the government.…
- 875 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
There were many forms of government through the 17th and 18th century. Two forms of government that were mainly used; were democracy and absolutism. Both of these government types were affective in their own ways, but also had various similarities and differences. Philosophers also helped with changing 17th and 18th century Europeans way of thinking; and view the teachings of the Catholic Church.…
- 447 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Absolutism has a great power that monarch, monarchy is the type of country that tends to be reported to the awe and respect.…
- 240 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Many monarchs, particularly those of European descent, employed the flourishing absolutist philosophy during their reign in the seventeenth century. Defined as the "absolute or unlimited rule usually by one man," absolutism is virtually equivalent to the philosophy of despotism. A ruler incorporating the absolutist philosophy has complete control of his subjects and the highest authority with which to govern. With origins dating back to the Ancient Greeks, absolutism found root in some of Aristotle's theories: "Aristotle despotic government (nearly convertible with tyrannical) is that of a single ruler that rules, not for the public good but for his own." And from Roman political theory "regarding the power of the monarch, there had survived, particularly, a legacy of ideas associated with the position and prestige of a ruler which greatly strengthened the power of a dynasty.” Based on this Greek foundation in Aristotelian thought and Roman political theory, absolutism rose in other schools of philosophy as it gained prominence in the political world.…
- 1029 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Absolutism was considered the most effective government during the time by giving the rulers unlimited power. Machiavelli, who wrote The Prince, felt that the best way to rule was to be feared by the people. He stated, “Men have less hesitation in offending a man who is loved than one who is feared, for love is held by a bond of obligation which, as men are wicked, is broken whenever personal advantage suggests it” (Document 1). In this quote, it explains how if you were a ruler that was feared, you would receive more respect from the people then if you were loved. King James I also believed that absolutism was the most effective way to rule. In his opinion, kings were Gods and he strongly supported the Divine Right. Divine Right is the belief that kings get their authority from God. "The state of monarchy is the most supreme thing upon earth; for kings are not only God's lieutenants upon earth, and sit upon God's throne, but even by God himself they are called gods" (Document 2). This quote explains how King James I believed he gained his authority from God and if you were chosen to rule, then you must be treated as if you were a god.…
- 528 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Catherine’s vision of Enlightened Absolutism would serve the people’s needs through her “Proposed Code of Laws”, and in return the people would support her policies of military expansion and the widening of the country’s borders to ensure economic growth and commerce for the future. In addition, the planned equal distribution of the countries tax burdens would equally inform the masses that the Monarchy was making an attempt to bring about change. This change, along with newly granted rights and freedoms would hopefully instill a feeling of allegiance in the hearts of those Catherine ruled, thereby securing the Monarchy’s…
- 892 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The idea of a single person holding dominion over all others to form an independent state is the driving force in state consolidation in 17th century Europe. Political development in this concept led to different methods of operating a government two prominent models being absolutism and constitutionalism. The first one centers on a strong centralized monarchy and the dominating royal power and the latter is based on a limited monarchy where the ruler is confined to the law and parliament. Theoretically, England planned to follow the constitutional model but the Stuart monarchs thought otherwise of this and conflicted with the Parliament throughout the century. This conflict centers on the evolution of England to becoming a world power.…
- 717 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Some of the ideas of the Enlightenment were used to challenge absolute monarchy. One example is given in Document # 1, Montesquieu who was a French philosopher during the Enlightenment, states, “There can be no liberty with the executive, legislative, and judicial powers are united in one person or body it a persons, because such concentration is bound to result in arbitrary despotism.” In this statement, Montesquieu is stating that liberty cannot exist where three powers of government are held by one person or body of persons. This is because then the people would not have rights for themselves. The idea was used to challenge an absolute…
- 1171 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Europe’s nobility saw absolutism as a complete loss of political power and influence. Absolutism was the governmental principle that the reigning monarch has a great, divine power, which is hindered by no one else within the country they rule. The 17th and 18th centuries was period in which nobles once held power and influence over government was diminished to the precipice of oblivion. King Louis XIV in France, the Hohenzollerns of Prussia, and Peter the Great of Russia all sought complete control of their territories. Although their economic statuses remained, the power of the European nobles had weakened.…
- 550 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays