Preview

Hume Vs Descartes

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
175 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hume Vs Descartes
Another marked difference between Hume and Descartes’ approaches to knowledge is a matter of existence. As specified by David Hume, a person can know that they exist because they use their senses to become aware of their bodily state. Their senses relay information to the brain that can be processed to form thoughts and conclusions. On the other hand, Descartes rationalizes that a person can know they exist because they are a thing that thinks, not because their “deceitful” sense told them so. Descartes’s Cogito philosophy translates to “I think, therefore, I am.” However, Hume calls to attention the point that thinking is, in a sense, a sense. Thinking is a type of feeling; Hume associates it with the senses. Descartes wanted to strip away

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    1. Business Decision; that compares the costs and benefits of manufacturing a product or product component against purchasing it. If the purchase price is higher than what it would cost the manufacturer to make it, or if the manufacturer has excess capacity that could be used for that product, or the manufacturer's suppliers are unreliable, then the manufacturer may choose to make the product. This assumes the manufacturer has the skills and equipment necessary, access to raw materials, and the ability to meet its own product standards. A company who chooses to make rather than buy is at risk of losing alternative sources, design flexibility, and access to technological innovations.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Powerful Ideas, An Introduction to Philosophy, aesthetics means "coming from the senses" which is a derivitive of the Greek word, aisthetikos (241). David Hume's believed that emotions are significant in both aesthetics and ethics. In addition, he stated that aesthetics involves both contemplation and judgment. He strongly believes that not everyone is suitable or qualify to judge art.…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes’s best work is “Meditations on First Philosophy” which is where most of his investigation on the questions of knowing takes place. In meditation I Descartes accepts that he has learned throughout his life with his senses…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume’s version of empiricism begins with his distinction between analytic propositions “relationship of ideas,” which he considers to be a priori and true by definition, and synthetic propositions, which he considers to be a posteriori (“matters of fact”), and which are opposite of analytic propositions because they’re derived from our senses.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fact that Descartes is even considering the mere question of his own existence just proves that he indeed exists and that is certain. Further, he argues that we are essentially thinking things (res cogitans) that can know our minds clearly and distinctly. Descartes pitches a tent for himself firmly in the rationalist camp, as opposed to the empiricist camp. He constantly emphasizes that the clear and distinct perceptions of the intellect are the only sure means of securing knowledge, and ultimately concludes that the senses are not designed to give us knowledge at all, but are rather meant to help us move through the world in a very practical…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    David Hume is a renowned Philosopher that has shaped the ideas of cause and effect (causality) as we know them today. He suggested that true cause and effect relationship has to be the result of A causing B. The occurrence of B happening is contingent on the fact that A occurs before B, thus causing B to happen. Since he holds that this is the only rational way to conclude that one thing causes another to happen, he goes as far as to say that human beings will never know the exact cause that takes place in order for B to be the result. Hume comes to this conclusion because he maintains that there are secrete causes that cannot be observed by the human eye, thus it is impossible for humans to rationally conclude that one thing caused another…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes vs Locke

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Descartes and Locke both agreed that there were things in life that exist that we can be certain of. For Descartes, human experiences did not provide sufficient proof of existence. He indicated that through his Dream Conjecture and his Evil-Demon Theory (Paquette 205). Descartes stated that we cannot be certain if reality is a dream or not, thus questioning our existence (Paquette 205). In his Evil-Demon Theory, Descartes claimed that for all he knew, an evil demon could be putting thoughts into his head, making him think that reality was true when it was in fact false (Paquette 205). Ultimately, all this thinking resulted in Descartes coming to the conclusion that the one thing we could be sure of existing is the mind (Newman 2010). This can be seen through his most famous quote, “I think therefore I am (Kaplan 2008).” Descartes claimed that since he was able to doubt and think using his mind, his mind must exist (Paquette 205).…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes v Hume

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The concept of self identifies the essence of one’s very being. It implies continuous existence having no other exact equal, i.e. the one and only. Whether or not the specific characteristic(s) used to define self are objectively real, i.e. physical attributes, or purely subjective, i.e. imaginary traits, the concept makes distinct one entity from another. Rationalism is the theory that truth can be derived through use of reason alone. Empiricism, a rival theory, asserts that truth must be established by sensual experience: touch, taste, smell, et al. Rene Descartes, a philosopher and rationalist concluded that one self was merely a continuous awareness of one’s own existence; one’s substance was one’s ability to think. On the other hand, David Hume, an empiricist refuted Descartes conclusion and claimed that the concept of self was nonsense, the idea could not be linked to any sensual experience. Ultimately, Hume concluded that there was no such thing as self, i.e. self does not actually exist and that the concept was an illusion. Overall, Descartes theory of self is more reasonable than Hume’s.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Cottingham, J. 1976. Descartes on ‘Thought’. The Philosophical Quarterly. Vol. 28, No. 112: pp. 261-263.…

    • 1981 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes vs Hume

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the history of philosophy, two of the most prominent philosophers were Hobbes and Hume. Both made important contributions to the world of ethics. One of the main important things they differed on is reason. Hobbs felt that reason is way to seek peace but Hume felt the reason is only a slave to passions. In the following paragraphs, you will see how Hobbes and Hume explain their different views on reason the theories of the two philosophers are analyzed in depth, so that we can have a comprehensive understanding.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While many rationalists such as René Descartes support the notion that the concept of Inception is not possible, empiricists such as David Hume may think differently. Hume was an eighteenth-century Scottish philosopher known for his system of radical and philosophical empiricism, skepticism, and naturalism. In one of his works, Hume stated that one cannot create completely new ideas without either prior knowledge of those ideas, or experiencing those ideas. Put differently, he believed that the ideas of an individual are derived or inspired by other ideas that the individual has observed, because there is no such thing as an “original idea.” Taking Hume’s theory into account, in the movie Inception, the protagonist Dom Cobb teaches his new architect, Ariadne, how dreaming works. In their shared dream, Ariadne comes across Dom’s wife, Mal. While this…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This could mean memories, thoughts and or beliefs. Hume also demonstrates an argument for the idea of God. I personally think his argument about God worked much better than Descartes’. He says that the idea of God can be determined by the impressions we have of “wise” and “good.” When referring to how we get from one idea to another, Hume explains how it corresponds.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    With this idea in mind, Descartes’s conception of knowledge would not allow him to know anything at all because of the idea that he has been feed false information his entire life. The conclusion that Descartes comes to was…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Yweah

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Have you ever felt that you didn’t know what your purpose was in this world? Or if you even exist at some times? Well by even questioning the idea of existence, by definition of Descartes and David Cunning, you do exist. Descartes came up with this notion of “I am. I exist,” which means if you are doubt, ponder, think or judge then you exist (THC 224). Before we get too far into Descartes beliefs we need to understand his two conjectures of the res extensa and the res cogitans, which respectively means extended thing and the thinking thing (THC 223).…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He explains his opinions on this matter in his second meditation, in which he attempts to clarify what “I” is, this “thing that thinks.” Descartes asserts that he is not only a thinking thing, but he is also capable of imagining and sensing. Descartes continues by questioning how he came to know this “I.” He explains how it cannot be due to our senses through his wax argument, and that it is not due to our imagination either because of the possibility of deception. This knowledge of “I” does not depend on any of the things he stimulates in his imagination because it cannot depend on anything that he doesn’t yet know. He explains that everything belonging to the nature of the body could be nothing more than dreams, so he realizes that nothing he can know by means of imagination involves the knowledge that he has of…

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays