Descartes believes that human nature is made up of two substances, one material and one spiritual: the extended thing which applies to everything organic or inorganic and the thinking thing, which according to Descartes, is only humans. He comes to the conclusion that only humans have minds because only humans can wonder and doubt things. David Cunning explains that animals do in fact have brains but they do not have the mental processes that we humans possess, they merely have a brain that receives messages from sensors but no cognitive ability (Cunning 123). Nina Rosenstand continues to add that there are two reasons why humans are the only ones with a mind. First, of the material and mental substances, only humans share in the mental side and secondly you need a mind to be self-aware. Pain is and awareness of a reaction to something so humans can be aware of pain because we have minds. She concludes that yes animals do have nerve reactions to stimuli that we humans would consider painful, but since animals have no minds, they experience no pain (226).
Now that we know humans are the only ones with minds that can think we can look at Descartes’s method of doubt. Even as a young man, as explained by Rosenstand, “Descartes felt that he was destined to change the course of science and philosophy. One night he had a persistent dream: he was going to invent a new science” (THC 223). He came up with six meditations of philosophy which is why we call him the “father of modern philosophy.” Descartes apples his method of doubt to things we seem to be true and evident like senses and consciousness and even logic such as math. He plays the devil’s advocate to show how his method works and to prove his point. Decorates asked “can I trust my senses? Not completely, because they have been known to mislead me sometimes, then can I ever trust them” (THC 223)? He states that since your senses have deceived you before then they can deceive you again therefore you can’t trust your senses. Same goes with consciousness and your sense of reality and time and place. If you are sleeping there are no indicators that you are asleep so you can’t trust if you are in a very real dream or actually reading this paper. Math has to be true right? According to Rosenstand, we could not be in control of our own mind. Some “evil demon” could be giving us false ideas and making you think they are true. “This demon might convince you that 2+2=5, and nothing in your reality would contradict it because the demon has already fixed that!” (224). So know that we can’t trust our senses and our consciousness and our logic of what we seem to be very clear and evident, Descartes asks us then we can believe in? His answer: our minds. He came up with this notion of “I am, I exist.” He states that “I am, I exist, is necessarily true each time that I pronounce it, or mentally conceive it” (THC 224). Descartes says that our questioning makes our mind real, which in turn makes our body real, but we can’t tell if the person standing in front of us is real or it this paper is real but we know that our mind is real.
The movie The Matrix illustrates a Cartesian plot because Descartes method of doubt asks us not to trust our senses or even our logic because for one we could be dreaming, and two we could be tricked. The movie illustrates an evil demon plot where the subjects believe they are moving in a real 3D world but it is really their minds projecting that they are moving around in the matrix. In fact their bodies are locked in vats and hooked up to machines that draw the energy out of the humans to feed the robots who now control the world. It is a classic Cartesian concept that makes us think and wonder if we are actually alive or if we are locked in vats and being controlled by soupier beings.
Descartes makes us wonder if our world is real and his theory has changes how people perceive their sense of being and put it into a constant state of question and disbelief. While we are stuck wondering and doubting we in fact exist. This theory of doubt has changed the way we think and has forever changed the face of philosophy.
Works Cited
Cunning, David. “Descartes on the Dubitability of the Existence of Self“. Philosophy and
Phenomenological Research 74.1 (2007): 111-131. Web. 13 Apr. 2013.
Rosenstand, Nina. The Human Condition. New York:McGraw, 2002. Print.
Essay 2
Tyler Timmer
Philosophy 107
16 April 2013
Option 3:
Descartes method of doubt
Cited: Cunning, David. “Descartes on the Dubitability of the Existence of Self“. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74.1 (2007): 111-131. Web. 13 Apr. 2013. Rosenstand, Nina. The Human Condition. New York:McGraw, 2002. Print. Essay 2 Tyler Timmer Philosophy 107 16 April 2013 Option 3: Descartes method of doubt
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
This surprise is first revealed after three paragraphs of Descartes debating the truth of his own existence between the conscious awake times and the unconscious dream times and the relationship to things in nature. According to Descartes (1636), “In thinking it is necessary to exist” and “that all things which we very clearly and distinctly conceive are true.” It is at that point that his focus turns to describing the proof of existence of God as the creator of all imperfect things.…
- 289 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Descartes's believed he could doubt everything that could be doubted, and the remainder was be the…
- 1747 Words
- 3 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Several incomplete statements are listed below. Correctly complete each statement by choosing the appropriate anatomical term from the key. Record the key letters and/or terms on the correspondingly numbered blanks below:…
- 302 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Descartes’ arguments for his methods of doubt were things may not be as they seem based on the perception of our senses may be skewed, our dreams may lead us to believe that what we dreamed might be real and that what we know as God may be false or that God may be a demon instead.…
- 601 Words
- 3 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The essence of the main argument in the fourth Meditation of Descartes is to establish that there is a difference between God: his creator and himself, and how this difference does not taint the infinite abilities of God. Descartes commences his argument by first establishing his idea of being a thinking being. In his previous book, The Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy he sates,…
- 739 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Descartes sets out on a mission to guarantee that every one of his beliefs is certain without any doubt. He considers that he should free himself of all false learning keeping in mind the end goal is to acquire any genuine information. Descartes chooses to question all that he has learned from truth in the past. He will depend on his thinking capacity to reconstruct his own particular knowledge, starting with a foundation of things which he is most sure about. Descartes declines to acknowledge anything that has any hint of doubt. His purpose behind doing such is because he genuinely trusts this is the best way to find the practical presence of something that cannot be questioned. Descartes uses a strategy in his endeavor to obtain information.…
- 650 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Descartes begins his argument about the soul by comparing the human body to machines and animals. Here he says that machines and animals both have something in common, as animals and humans have something also in common. Animals and humans on the one hand have what he terms the animal spirits' which control bodily organs, movements and involuntary actions. While animals and machines share that they may appear to be thinking but do not actually think. He writes that "if any such machines had the organs and outward shape of a monkey we should have no means of knowing that they did not possess entirely the same nature as animals." 1. (1)…
- 1200 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The fact that Descartes is even considering the mere question of his own existence just proves that he indeed exists and that is certain. Further, he argues that we are essentially thinking things (res cogitans) that can know our minds clearly and distinctly. Descartes pitches a tent for himself firmly in the rationalist camp, as opposed to the empiricist camp. He constantly emphasizes that the clear and distinct perceptions of the intellect are the only sure means of securing knowledge, and ultimately concludes that the senses are not designed to give us knowledge at all, but are rather meant to help us move through the world in a very practical…
- 894 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Descartes and Locke both agreed that there were things in life that exist that we can be certain of. For Descartes, human experiences did not provide sufficient proof of existence. He indicated that through his Dream Conjecture and his Evil-Demon Theory (Paquette 205). Descartes stated that we cannot be certain if reality is a dream or not, thus questioning our existence (Paquette 205). In his Evil-Demon Theory, Descartes claimed that for all he knew, an evil demon could be putting thoughts into his head, making him think that reality was true when it was in fact false (Paquette 205). Ultimately, all this thinking resulted in Descartes coming to the conclusion that the one thing we could be sure of existing is the mind (Newman 2010). This can be seen through his most famous quote, “I think therefore I am (Kaplan 2008).” Descartes claimed that since he was able to doubt and think using his mind, his mind must exist (Paquette 205).…
- 1175 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Descartes believes the mind is not dividable. He believes that the mind has no mass. I would have to agree the mind does not have any mass and is just housed in our body. It does the thinking for our body and is still somewhat of a mystery. The mind which I believe to be our soul uses the body as a home. As a young child I’m taught that the soul lives on even when my body is no more. I believe the mind is a gift from God and controls the body for as long as my mind continues to…
- 1053 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
"Give a detailed account of Descartes ' systematic doubt or methodical doubt in Meditation 1, making it certain that you distinguish between real doubts and so called hypothetical/metaphysical doubts. Then, explain in detail, exactly how Descartes dispels each and every one of these doubts during the course of the subsequent Meditations beginning with the cogito. Do you think that Descartes has been completely successful? Explain."The main goal of Descartes in Meditations on First Philosophy was to find truth behind all of his beliefs in order to build a solid foundation of certainty, and to focus his beliefs strictly on his idea of certainty; essentially to question knowledge. Descartes beliefs are mainly based on the theory that, if someone thinks that they really know something, they must be correct. Descartes meditations bring…
- 3392 Words
- 14 Pages
Better Essays -
East of Eden is a classic tale that incorporates many themes and motifs within the storyline. Throughout the film, Steinbeck makes numerous references about good versus evil. The characters Cal and Aaron Trask are based upon the biblical characters Cain and Abel. Aaron represents everything good while everyone considers Cal “bad.” The film starts off with Cal finding out a deep family secret. Adam Trask is a farmer, the war draft board chairman as well as Cal and Aaron’s father. In the story, he obviously favors Aaron more than Cal. He seems to have full confidence that Aaron will succeed in his life. However, when it comes to Cal he isn’t really sure who he is. The story takes a dramatic twist and Cal shows that even the “baddest” have some good in them.…
- 561 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
René Descartes realized that many of the things that he have accepted as the truth was false opinions, and consequentially the principles that were built upon them. He wanted to start anew by try to find out “the truth”, and then build upon that, because the foundation of science requires absolute certainty. In his attempt to find “the truth,” he started to criticize all of the things he had formally believed: applying the method of doubts, and then remove from the foundation what he found to be doubtable or deducible. He did this as he believed as his doubt increase, certainty decrease and vice versa. By the end of Meditation I, he was in a state called “Abyss,” where he was skeptical of all things and decided that the empirical world was presented to him by an evil demon He then reasoned that for him to be deceived by the demon, he must exist as something, a mind or a thinking thing…
- 1243 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The aim of Descartes’ first meditation is to first rid the mind of opinion and to only believe what is true. The second goal of his is to begin to put sciences on a firm foundation. He plans on achieving these goals by using a methodological doubt process in which he will see if he can discover a basis or corrosive agent that can bring all his beliefs into doubt. He believes that once a belief can be doubted, all…
- 1821 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
This is the first thing that Descartes knows to be true. He says, “What about thinking? Here I make my discovery: thought exists; it alone cannot be separated from me. I am; I exist- this is certain” (Descartes, 19). He goes on to say that his senses are deceptive and whatever he may understand from his senses may be false, therefore he cannot rely on them.…
- 1772 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays