Preview

Huxley vs. Orwell

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
951 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Huxley vs. Orwell
Sylvia McCleary
10/29/2014
English Comp 121
Compare and Contrast Essay
Final Draft

Aldous Huxley’s Book vs. George Orwell’s Book:
Infinite Distraction or Government Oppression?
By: Sylvia McCleary

Imagine a world where people are developed in factories, or a world where people just disappear for breaking the “mold”. This compare and contrast essay on Aldous Huxley and George Orwell’s philosophies and prose. Both authors created fictional worlds;
Orwell’s focuses on government oppression, and Huxley’s focuses on controlling people by flooding society with pleasurable things. Both authors describe a society that is futuristic, however, they both have descriptions that mirror our world today.
Huxley created a world where people were trained to love certain things. Huxley feared that there would be no reason to ban a book because there would be no one interested in reading books. In the book
Brave New World, people weren’t raised by their parents, in fact they didn’t even have parents. Babies were made in a factory where they would take one egg and split it however many times they wanted to. They could make up to ninety­one identical twins from just one egg. The story started out with a group of students receiving a tour of the London Hatchery and Conditioning Centre from a man literally named The Director. “The Director started by explaining the process by which the humans were grown inside bottles and then conditioned (brainwashed)” to believe certain
“morals”(Shmoop).

Sylvia McCleary
10/29/2014
English Comp 121
Compare and Contrast Essay
Final Draft

In short, what Huxley feared that the future of our government and that the government would give us so information that we would become passive and egotistical.
He feared that the truth would be “drowned in a sea of irrelevance”(ZeroHedge). Huxley also was concerned that “we would become a trivial culture preoccupied with some equivalent of the feelies, the orgy porgy and the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    B. Why does groups of 2,3,4,5 or 6 results in 1 left over egg, but groups of 7 has an equal amount of eggs with none left over. What # of eggs has equal groups of 2,3,4,5, or 6 with one left over and 7 goes into the number evenly.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    heredity lab worksheet

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4. Fill in the genotype of the offspring in each box by combining the genotype of sperm in its row with the genotype of the egg in its column. (Multiply the fraction of sperm of each type in the row headers by the fraction of eggs of each type in the column headers.)…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A major theme for both of Orwell’s works is the idea that people, ignorantly, don’t care about what they say or think, and then because they don’t have minds of their own they are easier to manipulate. In his Politics and the English Language, Orwell says how people don’t think about what they are writing and how they have no control over their own mind as ready-made phrases fill their paper and their mind. Then in 1984, Orwell takes this idea a step further showing how easy a civilization of thoughtless ignorance can become one of mindless devotion towards the government. In the book the characters lose their sense family ties, lose sense of time, they lose emotions, they lose their individuality, they lose their ability to remember the past,…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many reasons why people decide to challenge, censor, and even ban a book. Some may include the following: sexually explicit, racism, unsuited to any age group, violence/ profanity, religious reasons, political reasons, etc. One example of a banned work is novel by David Henry Lawrence: Lady Chatterley’s Lover. This book was written in 1928, just before he died. This book was banned was not allowed in legal circulation in Britain until 1960, 30 years after Lawrence's death. The book was branded as pornographic. Early on, it talks about two young girls giving themselves to men, outside of love and outside of wedlock. During that period, this was very objectionable to society in general. It was a sin to talk about, and it was an even more risky subject to write about. The idea…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beatty explains that the reason why books are banned is to keep everyone happy. Books grew to be considered bad because of “technology, mass exploitation, and minority pressure.” People were too impatient to read, no one wanted to be offended by anything or offend anyone else, and the thought and knowledge brought on by books made people different, and no one wanted to think they weren’t intelligent The world began to move quicker. People were impatient, and didn’t want to “waste” time reading; they preferred to have “the gag, the snap ending.” As people began to move quicker, they had less time to think deeply. People began to be more lazy, and didn’t want any more knowledge than they thought they needed. The population of the world grew,…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Upon reading this book I was unable to understand why it was banned. I realized then that this book is no longer banned for that reason. Today’s society does not view the…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    kak lang

    • 2371 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In the following passage, the contemporary social critic Neil Postman contrasts George Orwell’s vision of the future, as expressed in the novel 1984 (written in 1948), with that of Aldous Huxley in the novel Brave New World (1936). Read the passage considering whether Postman’s assertion of Huxley’s vision is more relevant today than is Orwell’s. Then, using your own critical understanding of contemporary society as evidence, write a carefully argued essay that agrees or disagrees with Postman’s assertion.…

    • 2371 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the book as a previously stated a reason for this book being banned is smoking and according to this article. In plymouth NHS plymouth 40% of the school aged children admitted to smoking. So if it is such a big thing in people life then why rip it from people in a book? It's Stupidity that people want to take things from people then turn around and let them do it.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In both Brave New World and Anthem the underlying themes are very similar. The government controls every aspect of people’s lives, everyone is supposed to be perfectly happy with what role they are given, and the main character do not fit into what the government was deemed normal. While both books have these very similar traits, there are many differences as well; the way the government controls the people, as well as the form of government, the way people of both societies treat each other, and the situation in which the main characters are placed.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the book the government decided to give into the idea of burning books because some people were offended. Once books were burned a new generation occured that…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Censorship in Judy Blume

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Books were being censored during the times of ancient Greece and Rome. The books weren’t just unavailable to the public; they were burned. Most people think that burning books is an over rated action, that just banning them is enough. Those people are wrong. Religious rights groups have had, and still do, well publicize bonfires where they burn books, magazines and CDs (Stephy, M.J. Censorship in Modern Times).Censoring books gives parents a sense of closure, knowing that their kids aren’t reading certain books (Judy Blume on the Web). Parents believe that “if their children don’t read about it, their children won’t know about it. And if they don’t know about it, it won’t happen” (Judy Blume on the Web). In the Constitution, the First Amendment states “congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.” These rights may give authors the right to write and publish whatever they like, but it also gives readers the right to voice their feelings toward the book, whether they are negative or…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    If we allow for books to be banned, it would limit our ability to have imagination and have an open…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Corrupt Utopian Societies

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cited: Huxley, Aldous, and Aldous Huxley. Brave New World: And, Brave New World Revisited. New York: HarperCollins, 2004. Print.…

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aldous Huxley

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages

    production of humans is immoral. Humans have the right to have children, or not have…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Books shouldnt be banned

    • 940 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The First Amendment of the Constitution guarantees our right to free speech, which includes the right to read and write books that might be considered by some to be too violent, hateful, or offensive. Some people feel that schools, libraries, and governments should be the judge of what books are good. Others believe that kids or their parents should have the freedom to decide for themselves, and shouldn't have others' viewpoints imposed on them." How is an author supposed to do right to free speech if the people in charge can pick and choose what books they want kids to read? Banning books would take away from their right to free speech. The author's that is. They wrote the book expecting anybody to be able to read it. By banning a book you are taking away from what the first amendment was supposed to do. If a person wants to read the thoughts and mind of an author, they should have the right to, regardless if it's bad or not. I believe it's what best for them; we can't tell a child what is best for them if we haven't met them. Because this freedom is one of our rights as Americans, people feel that any form of censorship is wrong. Most people believe that people should be free to read whatever they choose. According to Carol Brey-Casiano, "Not every book is right for every person, but providing a wide range of reading choices is important for learning, and imagination. The abilities to read, speak,…

    • 940 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays