4. Describe the role of nationalism in the creation of Germany, both before and after 1871. Include a summary of liberal and conservative nationalism in your answer.…
In the 1800’s Germany was divided into a three thousand kingdoms and city states. These kingdoms all had different culture, religions, and traditions. As well as an attitude that they were the best, the effect lead to the division of Germany as broken nation and Napoleon took advantage of that and attacked. This influenced Germany to reduce its self-down to 39 kingdoms and unite as Napoleon organized them and put his family at throne. In the 1860’s a leader known as Otto Van Bismarck took leadership of Germany with intentions of making it a nation to be recognized. With his time in power he was obviously a militaristic leader with intentions that a strong military leads to a strong nation. Bismarck who had a “blood and iron” policy showed his military ways. This meant iron as in weapons and blood as in killing that as long as the job gets done you just need these two components. This seemed to be effective policy, because Bismarck initiated three wars and defeated and lead the way with this policy, and even the Austro-Prussia war only lasting seven weeks until Germany defeated Austria. As well defeating Denmark in 1866 and France in the France-Prussia war. Bismarck policies and way of leading with an iron fist was best for Germany as they became a strong nation and a force to be reckoned with.…
In August of 1914, the German Reichstag made two major decisions. First, it began mobilization for World War I. Also it declared (Burgfrieden, or “civil peace” in which all previous issues and parties would be st aside for the duration of the war. As the years progressed, the peoples opinions changed in regards to this policy. In 1914, at the announcement, there was awe and happiness. By the middle of the war, in the years 1915 and 1916, people began to ignore the policy, as they were tired of the war. By 1918, opinion was divided, mostly between supporters and dissenters of the war. These views show how the progress of World War I affected the German population.…
Numerous factors have lead to the progressive creation of a unified Germany by 1871; such factors are fundamentally related to economic, political or military origins. To accurately understand the reasoning behind the unification, one must look at the history preceding it – The after-effects of the dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire; The significance of the French revolutions and Napoleonic Wars on Germanic national identity; the degradation of Austria’s national power; the introduction of the Zollverein in 1834 and the Prussian economic superiority that followed in addition to the industrialisation of the German states all contribute towards economic and political factors relating to the formation of a unified Germany under Prussia’s direction. Military factors contributing towards the unification of Germany include the defeat and exile of Napoleon Bonaparte; Otto Von Bismarck’s foreign policy based strongly around ‘realpolitik’; the significance of the ‘New Model Army’ on Prussia’s military prominence in addition to the conclusive Franco-Prussian war.…
The book “Imperial Germany 1871-1918” by Volker R. Berghahn has the under title Economy, Society, Culture and Politics and was first published in 1994 by Berghahn books. The used edition is the revised and expanded edition published in 2005 and summarizes the events in the ‘Kaiserreich’ (1871-1918). Furthermore, the book has 388 pages and is divided in five parts which are Economy, Society, Culture, the Realm of Politics, and World War I. Each part has numerous under parts giving the reader detailed information about each part. In addition, the author did tremendous research on the German Empire, founded by Otto von Bismarck in 1871 and lasting until the end of World War I, to clarify the broader outlines of the development between 1871 and 1918 and to explain why Germany went to war in 1914 and lost that conflict four years later.…
In the nineteenth century, Germany was struggling to unify after the failure of the Frankfort Assembly of 1848, which was meant to unify Germany. In 1862, William I, formerly known as Frederick William IV, was appointed king of the military state known as Prussia. As a result of disputes from the rising middle class, William I choose to hire Otto von Bismarck as chancellor in order to quiet the unrest. Otto von Bismarck was a realpolitik, someone whose decisions were based on practicality, not morals. The policies of Otto von Bismarck’s government represented the new kind of conservatism because they represented realpolitik through doing what’s best for the country by incorporating the growing idea of socialism into reforms, all while valuing…
Compare and contrast the foreign policy goals and achievements of Metternich (1815-1848) and Bismarck (1862-1890).…
The unification of both Germany and Italy brought great change in these countries. This process resulted in these countries to focus on for their independence, economic growth, and a strong nationalism. Also, there is another role of the unification and it is an occurrence of war, separation and controlling politics. War is a natural force which leads to unite some nations as wells as divide others. In the unification process, it is essential to have a confident and courageous leader. Bismarck was a leader in Germany while Cavour was a leader in Italy. Bismarck’s ideas were based on the pure survival. He insisted to work hard in a forceful way thought it might be brutal, to unify the Germany and therefore he was recognized as “Bloddy Iron”. The leadership of Italy was primarily based on the political issues.…
Otto Van Bismarck began his reign when he was appointed as the prime minister of Prussia in 1862 by King William I. At this point in time, Prussia was in a mediocre state of power, considerably inferior in comparison to its other surrounding nations. As Bismarck steps into his role as ruler, he had distinctive and clear goals for the rise of power of Prussia over the unification of Germany. His reign consisted of strategies that were effective in the manipulation of domestic and international politics and political parties (Merriman 663). Most significantly, his ability to satisfy both parties of nationalism and liberalism become a key factor in his successful ruling. Specifically, the unexpected victory of the Austro-Prussian war landed Bismarck…
Analyze the military, political, and social factors that account for the rise of Prussia between 1640 and 1786.…
Under the leadership of Bismarck, Germany experienced a time of great division between classes and some financial crashes, such as “the Gründerzeit burst in 1873, when a collapse of confidence brought an inevitable economic crash” (Fulbrook 131) from 1871 to 1890. In a time when the greater population was beginning to play a greater role in politics, Bismarck’s authoritarian style brought about a great deal of political and social tension because refused to consider any opposing viewpoints. When Otto von Bismarck was removed from power and imminent chancellorship in 1890, Emperor William II took power and implemented a far more…
Otto von Bismarck’s government in Germany represented a new kind of conservatism in the nineteenth-century Europe that was willing to change traditional conservative beliefs to better lead modern society. Bismarck was a realpolitik, which means he chose political alliances that would boost Prussia and Germany significantly, rather than morally preferable ones. Bismarck was able to successfully unify and govern the German Empire because he believed in the application of modern-day tactics and the idea that in order to grow an empire, you must be willing to put its’ needs first. In 1869, Bismarck showcased this belief when he issued a legislation that granted “all restrictions on citizenship of civil rights based on differences in religious confession…
Compare and contrast the foreign policy goals and achievements of Metternich (1815-1848) and Bismarck (1862-1890)…
Bismarck was an astute and revered leader in the European community. His departure signaled a change in Germany’s foreign policy. Germany’s pursuit for its own security became the reason for its insecurity. Germany became the strongest military power in continental Europe and caused Great Britain, France and Russia to align against it. Ironically, for the greater part of Imperial Germany’s history, Russia was considered the main threat to peace in Europe. Russia always wanted more land and craved for territorial expansion.…
After 1890, Germany was more aggressive. Germany wanted to build up its influence in every part of the world. German foreign policy in these years was best expressed by the term 'Weltpolitik' (World Politics). Because German ambitions were extended to many parts of the globe, Germany came into serious conflicts with all other major powers of Europe (except Austria-Hungary) from 1890 to 1914. Bismarck used wars to cause national unity within Germany but these nationalistic feelings soon disappeared once the country was actually unified. There were several different types of people located in Germany, all of them containing different views on the how the Empire should be ruled. Bismarck was a part of the Junkers or upper class, who supported militarism, and didn't like universal suffrage because it was a threat on their way of life. On the other hand, Southern German states embraced a liberal constitution, and a movement towards democracy grew in this region. Politics were not the only difference; religion broke down nationalism as well. Catholics who lived in the Empire…